Monday, November 4, 2013



Patna Blasts: What was it - Response, Revenge Or.
http://newageislam.com.sultan09.arvixevps.com/picture_library/Aiman-Reyaz-New-New-Age-Isl.jpg


By Aiman Reyaz, New Age Islam, Patna

The recent serial bomb attacks in Patna highlight the ideology-driven actions that led to a first of its kind series of blasts in the capital of Bihar, Patna.

What led to these 12 men to plant bombs in the heart of the city to cause maximum damage. The main intention was to kill, especially women and children via stampede but fortunately these handful of radicalised Muslim terrorists were unable to connect the wires properly which did not lead to the result they desired. And the BJP officials, who had organised the occasion for a speech by Gujarat Chief Minister and BJP's prime ministerial hopeful, Mr.  Narendra Modi, thankfully, led the crowd to believe that it was the fire crackers that were creating so much noise and that people should maintain calm.

The Patna blasts, like many other blasts in recent times across the world have been done as a certain ideologically driven action that has “promised rewards”. These rewards are to be given, or so they have been trained to think like this, in the next life and these are: to be called a shaheed (martyr), and a martyr who dies for the sake of Islam will get 70 full-bosomed virgins, besides getting wine, milk, honey and whatever the hearts will desire.

Types and Hypes

There are two types of people who do these things: first are those who are totally committed into believing that their belief system alone is the Truth (mind you it should be ‘the Truth’ and not just ‘truth’). They will never indulge in introspection into what their beliefs are. Since childhood they have been told things like: ‘Islam is the best religion’, ‘Islam is the Truth and time will prove that’, ‘non-Muslims will go to hell’, ‘do dawah because it opens the keys of heaven’ etc.

These are the people like Osama Bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Ahmed Abdi Godane etc. A sub-category of Muslims under this is that of people like Dr Zakir Naik, Ahmed Deedat, Sheikh Muhammad Abdul Jabbar etc. They fall under this sub-category because although they do not endorse killings, yet their version of Islam is individualistic, divisive and to say the least, not at all inclusive.



No comments:

Post a Comment