The Anthropic Cosmological Principle in a Quranic and Scientific Perspective

By V.A. Mohamad Ashrof, New Age Islam 11 June 2025 In the latter half of the 20th century, cosmology, the study of the universe's origin and evolution, stumbled upon a profound and unsettling mystery. As physicists refined their measurements of the fundamental forces and constants that govern the cosmos, a remarkable pattern emerged: the universe appears to be exquisitely "fine-tuned" for the existence of life. Had any of a number of physical parameters been infinitesimally different, the universe would have been a sterile, unobservable void of gas and radiation. This observation gave rise to a controversial and deeply philosophical concept known as the Anthropic Cosmological Principle (ACP), which posits, in its simplest form, that the universe's properties are as they are because we, as conscious observers, are here to measure them. This principle sits at the tense intersection of physics, philosophy, and theology. For some scientists, it is a mere tautology, a selection effect with little explanatory power. For others, it points toward speculative theories like the multiverse. Yet, for the a priori theist, the fine-tuning of the cosmos is seen as powerful evidence of deliberate design and purpose. This paper will explore the Anthropic Cosmological Principle by first outlining its scientific basis in the phenomenon of cosmic fine-tuning and the various interpretations it has spawned. It will then analyse the principle through the lens of the Quran, arguing that while the Quran is not a book of science, its core theological concepts—such as purposeful creation (Haqq), divine measure (Qadar and Mizan), the universe as a collection of signs (Ayat), and its subservience to humanity (Taskhir)—provide a profound and coherent metaphysical framework that resonates deeply with the implications of an anthropically-friendly cosmos. The Enigma of a Hospitable Universe The dialogue between the scientific enigma and the Quranic worldview reveals not a conflict, but a complementary relationship where scientific discovery can illuminate theological precepts, and theological precepts can provide a meaningful context for scientific wonder. The precision of the cosmos, quantified by science, becomes a profound meditation point when viewed through the Quranic lens, transforming from a mere cosmic coincidence into a sign of meticulous determination. The Quran states, "He to whom belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth... and has created each thing and determined it with [precise] determination" (25:2). This paper will delve into the depths of that determination, exploring how the language of physics and the language of revelation, though distinct, can converge upon a single, awe-inspiring truth: the precision of our existence is no accident. We will synthesize the arguments from physics, cosmology, and Quranic theology to develop a comprehensive understanding of humanity’s place in a universe that appears, against all odds, to have been prepared for it. Fine-Tuning and its Anthropic Interpretations The foundation of the Anthropic Principle is not philosophical speculation but an array of startling empirical facts about the physical architecture of our universe. The term "fine-tuning" refers to the observation that the fundamental constants of nature and the initial conditions of the universe are restricted to an astonishingly narrow range of values to permit the emergence of complex structures like galaxies, stars, planets, and ultimately, carbon-based life. This precision is not a minor curiosity; it is a central feature of modern cosmology that demands an explanation. Dozens of such "cosmic coincidences" have been documented by physicists and cosmologists. These are not isolated instances but form a web of interdependent conditions, each critical for a life-bearing universe. A few key examples illustrate the precariousness of our existence and the staggering degree of precision involved. The Strong Nuclear Force: This force, one of the four fundamental forces of nature, is responsible for binding protons and neutrons together within an atomic nucleus. Its strength is a dimensionless constant, typically expressed relative to the strength of electromagnetism. If the strong force were weaker by just a few percent, a crucial isotope of hydrogen known as deuterium (composed of one proton and one neutron) would not be stable. Deuterium is a necessary stepping stone in the nuclear fusion processes that power stars. Without it, stars could not "ignite" in the way they do, and the universe would consist of little more than hydrogen. Conversely, if the strong force were slightly stronger, protons would fuse together so readily that nearly all the hydrogen in the early universe would have been converted into helium during the Big Bang. This would leave no hydrogen to form water (H₂O), a crucial solvent for life, and no long-lived, stable stars like our sun, which burn hydrogen for billions of years, providing the stable energy source needed for complex life to evolve (Davies, p. 99-101). The existence of both hydrogen and the heavier elements of the periodic table hinges on the exquisite balance of this force. Carbon Resonance (The Hoyle State): Carbon is the backbone of all known life, capable of forming the long, complex molecular chains that are the basis of biology. However, its creation in the cosmos is a highly delicate affair. Carbon-12 is forged inside aging stars through the "triple-alpha process," where three helium nuclei (alpha particles) fuse. The probability of three particles colliding simultaneously is exceedingly low. For this process to produce carbon in the observed abundance, physicist Sir Fred Hoyle predicted in the 1950s that the carbon-12 nucleus must possess a specific, finely-tuned excited energy level, or "resonance," at approximately 7.65 MeV. This resonance acts as a crucial stepping stone, momentarily holding two helium nuclei together long enough for a third to join them. Hoyle urged experimental physicists at Caltech to search for this energy level, which they subsequently discovered, confirming his prediction. If this resonance level were even slightly different—by as little as 4%—the rate of carbon production would be so low as to make life impossible. Furthermore, there is another finely-tuned resonance in oxygen that prevents all the newly-formed carbon from immediately fusing into oxygen, ensuring that a sufficient amount of life-essential carbon remains (Barrow and Tipler, p. 252-254). This double fine-tuning is one of the most celebrated and compelling examples of anthropic precision. The Cosmological Constant (Dark Energy): The cosmological constant, often denoted by the Greek Letter Lambda (Λ), represents the energy density of empty space and is responsible for the observed accelerating expansion of the universe. According to quantum field theory, this value should be enormous, arising from the seething energy of virtual particles in the vacuum. However, observations of distant supernovae reveal that its actual value is incredibly small, about 120 orders of a magnitude (a 1 followed by 120 zeros) smaller than the theoretically predicted value. This is widely considered the "worst theoretical prediction in the history of physics." This discrepancy is a profound mystery, but the anthropic significance of its small value is clear. If the cosmological constant were significantly larger and positive, its repulsive force would have overwhelmed gravity from the beginning, causing the universe to expand so rapidly that matter could never have coalesced to form galaxies, stars, or planets. If it were large and negative, the universe would have re-collapsed into a "Big Crunch" long before life had a chance to evolve (Rees, p. 99-117). Physicist Steven Weinberg calculated that life as we know it constrains the cosmological constant to an extremely narrow window around its observed value, making its tiny magnitude a prerequisite for our existence. The Ratio of Electromagnetic Force to Gravity: Gravity is immensely weaker than electromagnetism, by a factor of approximately 10³⁶. This vast difference is essential for the structure of the cosmos. If gravity were substantially stronger (for instance, "only" 10³⁰ times weaker than electromagnetism), stars would be much smaller and would burn through their nuclear fuel in a few million years, far too short a time for the billions of years required for complex life to evolve on orbiting planets. The intense gravitational pressure would also make it difficult for large, complex organisms to exist. Conversely, if gravity were even weaker relative to electromagnetism, it would have been insufficient to overcome the thermodynamic pressures of the early universe, and matter might not have clumped together to form stars and galaxies in the first place (Davies, p. 138-139; Carr and Rees, p. 26). The Universe's Initial Entropy and Density: According to Roger Penrose, the initial state of the Big Bang had to be one of extraordinarily low entropy (a high degree of order) for the Second Law of Thermodynamics to operate and produce the structured universe we see today. He calculated that the odds of our universe's low-entropy initial condition arising by chance are stupendously small, on the order of one part in 10 to the power of 10¹²³. Penrose famously stated that to write this number out as 1 followed by zeros, "you would not have enough room to write it if you wrote a 0 on every single proton and every single neutron in the entire universe" (Penrose, p. 738). Furthermore, the overall density of the universe at its inception was fine-tuned to a remarkable degree. If the density were slightly higher, the universe would have collapsed back on itself. If it were slightly lower, it would have expanded too quickly for galaxies to form. This "flatness problem" indicates that the initial density was remarkably close to the "critical density" needed for a long-lived, structured universe (Guth, p. 234). These examples, among many others, paint a picture of a universe balanced on a knife's edge. The probability of such a life-permitting set of constants arising by sheer chance is, by most calculations, infinitesimally small. This is the "fine-tuning problem" that the Anthropic Principle attempts to address. Formulations of the Anthropic Principle The term "Anthropic Principle" was coined by physicist Brandon Carter in 1973 as a way to formalize the discussion around these observations. He proposed two main versions, which were later expanded upon and popularized by John Barrow and Frank J. Tipler. The Weak Anthropic Principle (WAP): This version is the less controversial and more widely accepted formulation. It states that "the observed values of all physical and cosmological quantities are not equally probable but they take on values restricted by the requirement that there exist sites where carbon-based life can evolve and by the requirement that the Universe be old enough for it to have already done so" (Barrow and Tipler, p. 16). The WAP is essentially a selection effect, or an observer bias. We should not be surprised to find ourselves in a universe that can support us, just as a fish should not be surprised to find itself in water. It explains why we do not observe a life-prohibiting universe. However, it does not explain why a life-permitting universe exists at all. It is scientifically conservative but offers little in terms of ultimate explanation for the underlying fine-tuning. The Strong Anthropic Principle (SAP): This is a far more controversial and powerful claim. One of its influential formulations is that "the Universe must have those properties which allow life to develop within it at some stage in its history" (Barrow and Tipler, p. 21). The SAP makes a much stronger assertion, implying that the emergence of observers is not a mere accident but is somehow mandated or written into the laws of nature themselves. This teleological flavor—the suggestion of purpose or a final cause—makes many physicists uncomfortable as it ventures beyond the traditional boundaries of empirical science and into the realm of metaphysics. It suggests that the universe is not just accidentally hospitable, but necessarily so. The Scientific Responses and Explanations The fine-tuning problem is too significant for science to ignore. In response, the scientific community has largely gravitated toward two potentials, non-theistic explanations that attempt to account for this precision without invoking design. The Multiverse Hypothesis: The most popular naturalistic explanation for fine-tuning is the multiverse. This hypothesis posits the existence of a vast, perhaps infinite, ensemble of universes, often conceived as "bubble universes" within a larger "meta-verse." Each of these universes has its own randomly assigned set of physical laws and fundamental constants. In this grand cosmic lottery, it is inevitable that a tiny fraction of these universes would, by pure chance, possess the right combination of properties for life to emerge. The Weak Anthropic Principle then acts as the selection filter: we naturally find ourselves in one of the rare, life-permitting universes because we could not exist to ask the question anywhere else (Susskind, p. 167). While elegant in its ability to explain fine-tuning through probability, the multiverse hypothesis suffers from a major scientific drawback: it is, by its very nature, speculative and currently untestable and unfalsifiable. We have no way of observing these other universes. For this reason, many critics argue that the multiverse is more a metaphysical proposition than a scientific theory (Hawking, p. 121). A Deeper, Unknown Law (Necessity): A second possibility is that a future, more complete "Theory of Everything" will demonstrate that the values of the fundamental constants are not arbitrary at all. This hypothetical theory might show that these values are uniquely determined by a deeper physical principle or a mathematical consistency, meaning the universe simply could not have been any other way. In this view, the universe is not "tuned" by chance or design; its properties are a matter of necessity. This is a hope for future physics, but as of now, no such theory exists. In fact, leading candidates like M-theory (a form of string theory) seem to point in the opposite direction, suggesting a vast "landscape" of 10⁵⁰⁰ or more possible universes with different properties, lending support to the multiverse idea rather than uniqueness (Greene, p. 256). Thus, modern science is left with a profound choice: to accept fine-tuning as a brute, unexplained fact; to embrace a tautology (WAP); to speculate about an unobservable meta-reality (the multiverse); to hope for a future theory of necessity; or to confront the uncomfortable, teleological implications of the SAP, which brings scientific discourse to the very edge of theology. It is into this explanatory vacuum that theological perspectives offer a different kind of answer, one rooted not in probability or unknown laws, but in purpose and will. The Quranic Perspective: A Universe of Purpose, Measure, and Signs The Quran is not a scientific textbook. To search its pages for predictions of physical constants or detailed descriptions of quantum mechanics is to fundamentally misunderstand its purpose, which is to provide spiritual and moral guidance for humanity. However, the Quran presents a comprehensive cosmology—a description of the nature and purpose of the universe—that provides a remarkably resonant framework for interpreting the scientific discoveries of fine-tuning. This framework is not based on empirical measurement but on revealed truths about the nature of God and His creation. It is built on several interconnected principles that directly address the questions of order, precision, and purpose raised by the Anthropic Principle. The most fundamental Quranic assertion about the cosmos is that its creation was a deliberate, purposeful, and meaningful act. The universe was not created as "play" or "in jest" (la'iban), a concept that stands in stark contrast to an accidental or random cosmic origin. This theme is a powerful and recurring refrain throughout the Quran. It declares, "We did not create the heavens and the earth and what is between them in play" (21:16), a statement echoed in 44:38-39: "And We did not create the heavens and the earth and what is between them for amusement. We did not create them except in truth, but most of them do not know." The Quran further challenges the assumption of a purposeless existence in 38:27: "And We did not create the heaven and the earth and that between them aimlessly. That is the assumption of those who disbelieve." Instead of randomness or play, the Quran asserts that creation is infused with Haqq. This rich Arabic term is difficult to translate with a single English word; it encompasses the meanings of truth, reality, justice, right, and purpose. The Quran states, "And it is God who has created the heavens and the earth in truth (bil-Haqq) and for a specified term..." (45:22). This concept of a purposeful creation, saturated with truth and meaning, aligns directly with the teleological undertones of the Strong Anthropic Principle. While the SAP suggests the universe must have properties conducive to life, the Quranic narrative provides the underlying "why": the universe was deliberately made so by a purposive, wise Creator. The very human-centric nature of the ACP finds a clear theological parallel in the Quranic assertion that this purposeful creation is ultimately meant to be recognized and appreciated by humanity, as captured in the prayer of those who reflect: "Our Lord, You did not create this in vain; exalted are You..." (3:191). Perhaps the most direct conceptual parallel to scientific fine-tuning is the Quranic emphasis on divine measure, balance, and proportion. The Quran frequently uses the word Qadar, which denotes a pre-determined, precise measure, decree, or determination. The verse "Indeed, all things We created with a due measure (bi-qadarin)" (54:49) encapsulates the idea that nothing in creation is arbitrary, haphazard, or chaotic. This is reinforced in 25:2, which describes God as He who "has created each thing and determined it with [precise] determination (Fa-Qaddarahu Taqdira)." Every aspect of the cosmos, from the orbits of celestial bodies to the properties of matter, is precisely determined and governed by this divine measure. The Quran describes celestial movements as following a precise calculation (Bi-Husban), as in 55:5: "The sun and the moon [move] by precise calculation." This concept is further elaborated through the principle of Mizan (balance). The Quran declares in a powerful sequence of verses, "And the heaven He raised and imposed the balance (al-Mizan). That you not transgress within the balance. And establish weight in justice and do not make deficient the balance" (55:7-9). Here, the Mizan is not merely a physical scale but a universal principle of equilibrium, harmony, and justice that governs the entire cosmos. It is both a physical reality embedded in creation and a moral imperative for humanity. The scientific discovery of the exquisitely balanced physical constants—where the slightest transgression would annihilate the potential for life—can be seen as a profound scientific affirmation of this cosmic Mizan. The fine-tuning of the strong force, the cosmological constant, the mass of elementary particles, and the properties of water are all modern, empirical expressions of this ancient theological concept of a universe created in perfect, life-permitting measure. The Quranic response to observing the intricate order of the natural world is not merely analytical but contemplative. The universe itself is described as a "book" filled with Ayat—a word that holds the dual meaning of "verses" of the revealed scripture and "signs" in the natural world. These signs are not cryptic messages but clear pointers intended to guide thoughtful individuals toward an awareness of the Creator's power, wisdom, and mercy. The Quran is replete with invitations to observe and reflect on these signs. A comprehensive example is given in 2:164: "Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the alternation of the night and the day, and the [sailing of] ships through the sea with that which benefits humanity, and what Allah has sent down from the heavens of rain... and [in] the alteration of winds and clouds subjected between the heaven and the earth—are signs for a people who use reason." From this perspective, the scientific discovery of cosmic fine-tuning is the uncovering of one of the most profound, subtle, and intellectually compelling ayat in the cosmos. It is a sign hidden not in the visible grandeur of a mountain or a star, but within the very mathematical fabric of reality, accessible only through the tools of modern physics. This resonates with the Quranic promise, "We will show them Our signs in the horizons and within themselves until it becomes clear to them that it is the truth" (41:53). The "signs in the horizons" (al-Afaq) can be interpreted as the grand cosmological discoveries about the universe's origin and structure, while the "signs within themselves" (fi Anfusihim) can refer to the biological and chemical prerequisites for life. The fine-tuning argument powerfully connects the two: the conditions of the distant horizons (the universe's initial state and fundamental laws) are shown to be directly and precisely linked to the possibility of existence "within ourselves" (our carbon-based, water-dependent biology). The very act of scientific inquiry, from this viewpoint, becomes a form of Tafakkur (reflection), an engagement with the signs of God. The Quranic narrative provides a clear and robust theological grounding for the "anthropic" part of the principle—the specific focus on the conditions required for human life. The Quran repeatedly uses the concept of Taskhir, which means that God has made the phenomena of the universe subservient, or serviceable, to humanity. This is not a license for arrogant exploitation but a description of a prepared, regulated, and hospitable environment. The Quran states, "And He has subjected to you whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth—all from Him. Indeed, in that are signs for a people who give thought" (45:13). This theme is echoed in 14:32-33, where the sun, the moon, the ships on the sea, the day, and the night are all described as being made to serve humanity's needs. The Earth itself is described as a prepared dwelling: "[He] who made for you the earth a bed and the heaven a ceiling..." (2:22). The universe, in this view, was intentionally designed to be a suitable home for conscious, moral beings. The fact that the laws of physics are "just right" for us is, in the Quranic worldview, not a lucky accident of a cosmic lottery, but a deliberate act of divine providence and mercy (Rahmah). The Anthropic Principle, from this vantage point, becomes a scientific echo of the theological doctrine of Taskhir. But to what end was this precisely-calibrated stage set? The Quran provides a clear, multi-faceted answer to the purpose of human existence within this fine-tuned cosmos. Worship and Recognition (`Ibadah): The ultimate purpose is explicitly stated in 51:56: "And I did not create the jinn and mankind except to worship Me." This worship is not a ritualistic act for God's benefit, as He is self-sufficient, but a state of being—of recognition, gratitude, and submission to the reality of the Creator—that benefits and elevates the human being. The fine-tuned universe serves as the primary evidence that calls for this recognition. Moral Test (Ibtila'): This life is an arena for a moral and spiritual test. "He who created death and life to test you [as to] which of you is best in deed" (67:2). The gift of a hospitable universe is coupled with the gift of free will, which is the mechanism of this test. Humans are given the freedom to obey or disobey, to be grateful or ungrateful, to act with justice or with corruption. The Quran affirms this freedom in 18:29: "And say, 'The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills—let him believe; and whoever wills—let him disbelieve.'" Without free will, the concepts of moral accountability, justice, and the Day of Judgment (99:7-8) would be meaningless. Stewardship (Khilafah): Humanity has been entrusted with the role of Khalifa (steward, vicegerent) on Earth (2:30). This role involves the responsibility to act as moral agents, to maintain the Mizan (balance) established by God, and to care for the creation that has been made subservient to them. This elevates the human role from a mere observer (as in the WAP) to an active, responsible participant in the cosmic drama. The relationship between the divine decree (Qadar) that governs the fine-tuned universe and human free will is a nuanced "matter between two matters." God, in His infinite knowledge and power, establishes the physical laws and parameters of the cosmos—the stage and its rules. Within this divinely-measured framework, humans are granted genuine agency and are accountable for their choices (41:46). The fine-tuned universe does not imply a deterministic fate for human action; rather, it provides the stable and predictable environment necessary for meaningful choice and consequence. Synthesis and Dialogue: Bridging Two Modes of Inquiry In bringing the scientific and Quranic perspectives into dialogue, it is crucial to avoid the fallacy of "scientific concordism"—the simplistic and often forced attempt to read modern scientific facts directly into the verses of ancient scripture. The Quran is not a science textbook, and science is not a tool for scriptural exegesis. They operate in different epistemological domains and answer different kinds of questions. Science employs the empirical method to ask "how" questions about the material world: How did the universe begin? How do physical forces interact? The Quran, as a work of revelation, addresses "why" questions about ultimate meaning, purpose, and morality: Why does the universe exist? Why are we here? What is our purpose? However, these two domains are not hermetically sealed off from one another; they can be profoundly complementary. The fine-tuning argument is a perfect case in point. From a Scientific "How" to a Theological "Why": Science uncovers the "how" of fine-tuning: the precise values of the constants and the delicate balance they maintain for life to exist. This very discovery, however, forces a "why" question that science alone struggles to answer. Why are the constants what they are? The multiverse hypothesis is an attempt to answer this "why" while remaining within a naturalistic framework, but it does so by positing an unobservable, untestable reality, making it a metaphysical claim. The Quranic worldview, on the other hand, offers a direct metaphysical answer: the universe is finely tuned because it was created bil-Haqq (with purpose) by an intelligent, wilful Creator. The scientific data does not prove this answer, but it creates an intellectual space where such an answer becomes highly plausible and coherent. The Explanatory Power of a Theistic Framework: The Quranic framework offers a more comprehensive explanatory scope than its naturalistic rivals. The multiverse, for example, may explain the fine-tuning for life, but it does not explain why there should be a universe-generating mechanism at all, nor why the resulting universes should be governed by elegant, intelligible mathematical laws. Theism, in contrast, posits a mind of infinite intelligence as the ground of all being. From this premise, one would expect a universe characterized by order, mathematical beauty, intelligibility, and purpose. The fine-tuning for life is not an isolated anomaly to be explained away but is part of a larger, coherent picture of a deliberately crafted cosmos. The ACP as a Modern Ayah: The fine-tuning argument can be seen as a powerful sign (ayah) for the modern, scientifically-literate mind. In an age that often demands empirical evidence, the mathematical precision of the cosmos speaks a language of logic and data that points toward the very concepts the Quran has articulated for centuries. It is an intellectual bridge that can lead from an appreciation of the physical world to a contemplation of its ultimate origin. The Quranic call to reflect (Tafakkur) on the signs of creation (3:190-191) finds a potent new subject in the constants of physics. The Anthropic Principle, which appears as a strange and uncomfortable puzzle from a purely materialistic perspective, finds a natural and coherent home within the Islamic theological tradition. Fine-Tuning as a Bridge Between Science and Faith The Anthropic Cosmological Principle emerged from the heart of modern physics as a response to the staggering unlikelihood of our own existence. The intricate fine-tuning of the cosmos, from the strength of the nuclear force to the infinitesimal value of the cosmological constant, presents a profound challenge to a purely accidental view of the universe. It has forced science to confront questions that blur the line between physics and metaphysics, prompting explanations that range from the scientifically conservative Weak Anthropic Principle to the speculative multiverse and the teleologically-charged Strong Anthropic Principle. When viewed from a Quranic perspective, this scientific enigma transforms into a theological affirmation. The Quran’s depiction of a universe created with purpose (Haqq), governed by a perfect balance and measure (Mizan and Qadar), filled with signs (Ayat) for those who reflect, and prepared as a serviceable home for humanity (Taskhir) provides a robust and coherent metaphysical framework for understanding a life-permitting cosmos. The scientific data on fine-tuning does not "prove" the Quran in a mathematical sense, but it aligns so perfectly with its core cosmological and theological concepts that it can serve to deepen faith and inspire a profound sense of awe. The dialogue between the Anthropic Principle and the Quranic worldview demonstrates that science and faith need not be adversarial. Instead, scientific discovery can be a vehicle for spiritual reflection, unveiling the intricate artistry of a cosmos that, according to both modern physics and ancient scripture, appears to be profoundly and purposefully measured for our existence. The precision that allows for human life is not a mere footnote in the cosmic story but is perhaps its central theme. It invites a response of humility, gratitude, and contemplation, echoing the prayer of those who understand the signs: "Our Lord, You did not create this in vain; exalted are You! Then protect us from the punishment of the Fire" (3:191). The fine-tuning of the universe is a testament to its precision, and for the believer, that precision is the unmistakable signature of the Creator. Bibliography Barrow, John D., and Frank J. Tipler. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford; Oxford University Press, 1986. Carr, B. J., and M. J. Rees. "The anthropic principle and the structure of the physical world." Nature, vol. 278, 12 Apr. 1979, pp. 605-12. Davies, Paul. The Accidental Universe. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1982. Greene, Brian. The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory. New York; W. W. Norton & Company, 1999. Guth, Alan. The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins. Reading, MA; Addison-Wesley, 1997. Hawking, Stephen, and Leonard Mlodinow. The Grand Design. New York; Bantam Books, 2010. Penrose, Roger. The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford; Oxford University Press, 1989. Rees, Martin. Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe. New York; Basic Books, 1999. Susskind, Leonard. The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design. New York; Little, Brown and Company, 2005. ------ V.A. Mohamad Ashrof is an independent Indian scholar specializing in Islamic humanism. With a deep commitment to advancing Quranic hermeneutics that prioritize human well-being, peace, and progress, his work aims to foster a just society, encourage critical thinking, and promote inclusive discourse and peaceful coexistence. He is dedicated to creating pathways for meaningful social change and intellectual growth through his scholarship. URL: https://www.newageislam.com/islam-science/anthropic-cosmological-quranic-scientific-perspective/d/135835 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism