Tuesday, January 20, 2015

‘Unwed Bride’ Roams Cairo in Her White Dress





Samah Hamdi's viral video project aims to dump social taboos about unmarried women in the country. The sign reads: "Would you like anything else?!" (Courtesy: Hamdi/Facebook)


‘Unwed Bride’ Roams Cairo in Her White Dress
Saudis Alarmed Over Number of Unmarried Women
Lebanon Religious Laws Violate Women’s Rights
The Female Pioneers behind the Golden Age of Egyptian Cinema
Muslim Women Org. Condemns Islamophobic Attacks in Europe
Isis: Jihadi Janes in Syria Incite UK Muslim Women to Violence Says ICSR Study
Haia Objects to Children’s Dance
Saudi Implores Authorities Not To Deport Expat Wife
Woman Admits To Taking Part in Dh2.8m Heist
Compiled by New Age Islam News Bureau
------

‘Unwed Bride’ Roams Cairo in Her White Dress
19 January 2015
An unwed woman is roaming the streets of Cairo in a wedding dress to dump social taboos about unmarried women in the country.
In a viral, award-winning video, Samah Hamdi, 27, is seen riding the subway, walking about, and eating at a restaurant – all while donning her bridal attire.
According to Egyptian news site Ahram Online, an unmarried Hamdi was “tired of being put in a pigeonhole by her family.” She was reportedly inspired by family squabbles over the fact that she is "late" for marriage.
"I just want to appear in the way my family and mother, a microcosm of society, have always pushed to see me in," Hamdi, an interior designer who is pursuing a Master's degree in performance arts, was quoted as saying by the site.
"No matter how accomplished you are, that won't count if you aren't married or haven't undertaken the mission you were purportedly created for: getting married and establishing a family," Hamdi added.
The five-minute video art project produced 56 photographs of Hamdi going about her usual daily routine in the dress. It was shot over the course of almost a year. “The project only came to light when it was shown in the Cairo Opera House's 25th Salon of Young Artists in November 2014. There was a screening of the video, with the photos displayed on an adjoining wall coupled with twin-texts representing Hamdi's replies to the negative conventional image of unmarried women. The project won the Ahmed Basiouny prize for video installation,” Ahram Online reported.
According to official figures in 2011, almost nine million Egyptians reach 33 without tying the knot, nearly half of them women.
"[Society] believes that any other women's plans or aspirations should serve that end: you become a doctor or pursue Master's so you can land on a doctor or a better prospective groom; you dress this way so you appeal to and attract men, etc."
But Hamdi still faces conflicting ideas within her own family about the project.
“Hamdi's mother … thinks her daughter, whom she views as a ‘spinster,’ played in the stunt a role she has ‘failed to accomplish in real life’ — getting married,” Ahram Online reported. — Al Arabiya News
http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentid=20150119230952
------------

Saudis Alarmed Over Number Of Unmarried Women
January 19, 2015
Manama: Saudis have called for radical solutions to help address the growing phenomenon of unmarried women in the country.
The latest alarm was sounded this week by Mohammad Al Abdul Qadir, the head of Wiam Family Care Society, who said that around 1.5 million Saudi women above 30 were not married.
The figure represents 33.4 per cent of the number of women in the kingdom, he said, local daily Makkah reported.
“We need to work on a new vision for Saudi families for the next ten years,” he said. “We need solutions that are based on the consolidation of the values of family solidarity and cohesion in order to confront several phenomena, particularly spinsterhood,” he said.
AdTech Ad
Some Saudi female activists said that the figure of unmarried women in the kingdom was around two million.
“This is a huge and scary figure that indicates an ominous social catastrophe could happen if no radical solutions are found for this phenomenon,” the activists said.
However, several Saudi women have refused to categorise spinsterhood as a dangerous phenomenon, explaining that many women preferred to remain unmarried by choice.
“There are those who have refused to get married for one reason or the other and there are those who have opted to succeed in their lives over getting into marriage,” they said.
According to the daily, many of the men who did not get married said that they did not have a steady source of income to allow them to start a family.
Social experts said the issue and causes of spinsterhood differed from one country to the other.
“In Saudi Arabia, the main problem is that some families ask for high dowries,” they said. “There is also the problem of the onerous costs of the marriage ceremonies. Such problems often push young men to seek to take foreign wives,” they said.
Even though Saudi and other Gulf men overwhelmingly prefer to marry their countrywomen, thousands of them take foreign wives.
The inability to pay large sums of money for dowry, exorbitant marriage ceremonies and high living costs have often been cited as the major reasons for Gulf men to marry non-Gulf women.
The phenomenon has pushed the Gulf countries to look for ways to address it.
One option was to encourage the concept of mass marriages in a bid to help needy grooms and brides with the high costs of ceremonies.
In 2010, Kuwait set up a committee to limit marriages between Kuwaiti men and foreign women.
In 2007, a Bahraini lawmaker caused a storm by urging his male peers to take four wives, three Bahraini women and one foreigner, in order to help address the issue of the high number of spinsters in the country.
Jasem Al Saidi, an independent who served in the lower house from 2002 until 2014, said that Bahraini men should not hesitate to wed more than one wife for the sake of the nation.
“We do not want to have spinsters in the country and we do not want a rise in the divorce rate, either,” he said. “Taking more than one wife is the solution, and I advise that the members of the Council of Representatives should set the example.”
His suggestion was promptly turned down by the other MPs.
http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/saudi-arabia/saudis-alarmed-over-number-of-unmarried-women-1.1443366
------------

Lebanon Religious Laws Violate Women’s Rights
January 19, 2015
Beirut: Lebanese laws and courts governing marriage and child custody “discriminate against women” from all religious groups, often trapping them in abusive unions, a Human Rights Watch report published Monday said.
The small Arab country has a fragile mosaic of Christian and Muslim communities of multiple denominations whose right to oversee their own religious courts is enshrined in the constitution.
“Lebanon has 15 separate personal status laws for its recognised religions but no civil code covering issues such as divorce, property rights or care of children,” the New York-based group said.
“These laws are administered by autonomous religious courts with little or no government oversight, and often issue rulings that violate women’s human rights.”
AdTech Ad
The 114-page report, titled “Unequal and Unprotected: Women’s Rights Under Lebanon’s Religious Personal Status Laws,” interviews women from across Lebanon’s sectarian spectrum and analyses hundreds of legal judgements.
It says Sunni and Shiite women have limited access to divorce, while “men... have a unilateral, unlimited right to pronounce a divorce, with or without cause”.
Neither Christian men nor women are allowed to divorce, but “there are instances that allow men more grounds” for divorce or annulment.
Druze women also have limited access to divorce, “while Druze men can obtain a divorce, with or without cause”, said the report.
All Lebanese women suffer from a lack of protection from domestic violence, as well as financial vulnerability if they do divorce an abusive husband, the group said.
In 2014, Lebanon’s parliament passed a landmark law on domestic violence.
While it marked a significant step forward for women, it defined domestic violence “narrowly, thus failing to provide adequate protection”, said HRW.
In the event of conflict between the new domestic violence law and pre-existing personal status laws, the latter take precedence, the report added.
And women who decide to divorce still face serious financial consequences, as “Lebanese law does not recognise the legal concept of marital property”.
After a marriage ends, “property reverts to the spouse in whose name it is registered (typically the husband), regardless of who has made contributions to it”.
The issue of child custody is just as problematic, according to the report, violating the standards set by the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
“Human Rights Watch interviewed women who stayed in abusive marriages, gave up their monetary rights, and did not remarry to maintain primary care of their children in cases where judges did not consider the best interests of the child,” the report said.
One Christian woman, Mireille, was quoted by HRW as saying: “I forced myself to bear beyond what a human being can take, all the injustices and violence. My daughters, who are my soul and my life, were the main reason... I couldn’t even bear the idea of losing them.”
The watchdog called for fundamental changes to ensure equal rights for all Lebanese, regardless of gender or religion.
http://gulfnews.com/news/region/lebanon/lebanon-religious-laws-violate-women-s-rights-1.1443413
------------

The Female Pioneers behind the Golden Age of Egyptian Cinema
Jan. 19, 2015
Faten Hamama, the greatest of Egypt’s film actresses, died at the age of 83 last Saturday. Hamama, who was known as “the Lady of the Arabic Screen,” acted in about 100 films from the 1940s until 2000.
She was born in 1931, in the village of Sanblawin, and began acting in films in the Egyptian realist genre during the 1950s – the golden age of Egyptian cinema.
In these films, Hamama played women fighting for their place in Egypt’s patriarchal society – sometimes as a young woman from a rural community who flouts convention and leaves; sometimes as an urban woman who fights against the laws that discriminated against women.
Hamama appears in 18 of the 150 films chosen as classics of Egyptian cinema by the Cairo International Festival in the late 1990s, including “Struggle in the Valley,” where she met her second husband, the actor Omar Sharif.
Hamama was awarded many international prizes for her roles, including an honorary doctorate from the American University in Cairo. About a year ago, when Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah al-Sissi was addressing various artists and noticed Hamama in the audience, he stopped his speech, stepped from the stage and went to welcome her, as a sign of respect for her unique status as the first lady of Egyptian cinema.
Positions of power
Hamama’s passing provides an opportunity to become acquainted with the women pioneers of Egyptian cinema who preceded her – women who were active during the first half of the 20th century and held positions of power in Egypt’s film industry.
Although women in high-level positions have become something of a rarity in Egypt’s film industry in recent decades, it was not always so. Beginning in the 1920s, women were the ones who held powerful positions in Egyptian cinema – not only as actresses, but also as producers, directors, editors, soundtrack composers and distributors. And, for a brief time, they were even stronger than men within the industry.
There were six particularly prominent female pioneers: Aziza Amir (1901-1952); Assia Dagher (1908-1986); Behidja Hafez (1908-1983); Fatma Rouchdi (1908-1996); Amina Mohamed (1908-1985); and Mary Queeny (1916–2003).
Each came from a different economic and geographic background. Some were Christian, others Muslim. But they all had one thing in common: There was no man in their lives – neither father, brother nor husband – who could impose restrictions on them, keep them from working, or steal the money they earned.
In addition, a significant element that helped their professional success was that most of them were born and grew up during a time that was a turning point in the lives of women in the world in general, and also in Egypt: World War I, when the men in many countries were drafted to fight, and women went out to work.
The idea of women’s liberation had reached Egypt even before then, during the second half of the 19th century, with the influence of European culture and, even more, of the British occupation of Egypt in 1882.
Egyptian travellers who visited Europe called in their letters for the emancipation of Egyptian women, and the national struggle that peaked with the 1919 uprising led to the rapid freeing of women from the shackles of tradition and their going out to demonstrations alongside men.
A feminist movement was active in Egypt during the 1920s.
Women such as Huda Sha’arawi – the leader of the movement to free women from the obligation to wear the veil – and the Palestinian poet May Ziade, who lived in Cairo, worked hard for women’s liberation and advancement in society.
Jewish actresses paved the way
With perfect timing, the Egyptian film industry began to thrive and became one of the areas of employment where women could integrate. But it was not easy. Since theatre professions were off-limits to Muslim women, young men played women’s roles in early Egyptian theater. Later, thanks to the Jewish journalist and playwright Yaqub Sanu (also known as James Sanua) – the founder of Egyptian theatre – Christian and Jewish women who spoke Arabic began appearing on the stage. Jewish actresses paved the way for Muslim women, who began to appear on the stage around the time of World War I. But they were mostly actresses, not directors or producers.
What sets these six women apart from other actresses of the time is that they did not remain actresses.
They took professional risks and embarked on financial adventures that they often had a hard time maintaining, but they stayed on their independent path.
Some of them continued to be active during the 1950s and ’60s, but their power lessened as the years went by, and most of them died penniless.
Also, although women producers and directors existed in Egypt later on – such as Magda (born, 1931), the producer and actress (her birth name was Affaf Kamel Elsabahy), or the feminist director Inas El-Degheidy (born 1953) – they were subjected to limitations as time went on and Egypt’s film industry became more and more controlled by men.
Fading glory
There are various reasons why this happened. Unfortunately, the national independence that is often won at the end of a struggle contains men’s independence on the one hand and the restriction of women by patriarchal tradition on the other.
It is possible that the fading glory of Egyptian cinema – which dipped in the late 1960s and dived to its lowest point in the 1980s and ’90s – brought with it a reduction in the status of the women who worked in the industry.
It is also likely that the return to religion and tradition kept women from continuing to work in the cinema over the years.
Either way, it is obvious that women no longer occupy the honored place that they held in the first half of the 20th century.
The issue of women’s underrepresentation in Egypt’s film industry is one of the major issues that Egyptian director Marianne Khoury dealt with in her acclaimed documentaries “Women Who Loved Cinema” (2002, 2003).
Each of the young women interviewed recounts the difficulties she encountered in the field, and her fear of working with a production company that might dismiss her or expropriate her work.
But much has happened in Egypt since the film reached the big screen.
The founding, in 2005, of the Rotana Cinema satellite channel – the first open channel to broadcast Arab films – heralded the entry of a great deal of capital into the local film industry, which led to the renewed blossoming of the industry and an increase in the number of films produced per year.
Also, Egypt embarked on a new national struggle, which, while not calling for liberation from colonialism, definitely sought to free the country from the yoke of the previous regime, from tyranny and the ongoing exploitation of most of the population.
The Rotana Cinema channel marked its 10th anniversary on New Year’s Eve with a day of special broadcasts, which included interviews that Hala Sarhan conducted with Egypt’s best actors and actresses, past and present.
Among those interviewed was actress Ilham Chahine, who began acting in Egyptian films in the 1980s and quickly became a star. Chahine, a successful film producer, now symbolizes an important trend in the industry.
“I want to restore Egyptian cinema to what it used to be: the lighthouse of Egyptian culture,” she said in the interview.
The existence of other women producers in the industry, such as actress Mona Zaki and Sarhan herself, could be good news for Egyptian cinema, and perhaps for Egypt as a whole.
http://www.haaretz.com/life/movies-television/1.637775
------------

Muslim Women Org. Condemns Islamophobic Attacks in Europe
18/01/2015
(MENAFN - Kuwait News Agency (KUNA)) The European Forum of Muslim Women has condemned the rise in Islamophobic attacks and abuse in Europe following the tragic event in Paris last week.
Mosques and veiled women were violently targeted, said the Brussels-based Forum in a press release. "In this hate-fighting climate, we must adopt a responsible attitude refusing the stigmatisation of any community. Together, we must stand united against terrorism. This is because terrorism strikes indiscriminately without distinguishing between ethnicity, gender or religion," it noted.
The Forum also strongly condemned the shooting at the headquarters of the Charlie Hebdo newspaper in Paris and called on French and European citizens to unite against violence and stand together for peace. The European Forum of Muslim Women was formed in 2006 to work within the EU to support the involvement of the Muslim woman in the society as a citizen and to defend her interests in Europe.
http://www.menafn.com/1094078305/Muslim-women-org-condemns-Islamophobic-attacks-in-Europe?src=RSS
------------

Isis: Jihadi Janes in Syria Incite UK Muslim Women to Violence Says ICSR Study
Mark Piggott By Mark Piggott
January 18, 2015
The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (ICSR) at King's College, London has monitored social media communications by some of the 50 or so British women who have gone to Syria to join Isis – many of them marrying jihadists.
It had been thought that these so-called "Jihadi Janes" played a passive role, cooking and cleaning for their men and bearing their children. However it now appears they are playing an active role both in repressing women in Syria and inciting female fanatics in the UK to commit atrocities.
Some of those now in Syria have praised the Charlie Hebdo killers and encouraged the killing of Westerners, including beheadings.
"British women tend to incite [attacks]," ICSR research fellow Melanie Smith told The Observer. "They say to people that can't move to the Islamic State: 'Why not carry out something at home?' That's a common message: if you can't leave your family behind or afford to move to Syria then carry out something."
Smith administers the first database of British female jihadists overseas, and warns that women who return from the Middle East may pose a threat to the UK.
"I don't think anyone talks about women returning as a risk," said Smith. "While they might not have the same military training, you can see women online being frustrated about the fact they can't fight and they suggest to each other that they could do something else. Women historically have been used in suicide bombings and singular operations."
British women who have gone to Syria include Chorlton twins Salma and Zahra Halane, 16, who have married Isis fighters, and Glasgow public schoolgirl Aqsa Mahmood, 20, who leads the al-Khanssaa brigade which runs brothels of sex-slaves, many believed to be from the Yazidi tribe.
Last year Mahmood tweeted: "Follow the examples of your brothers from Woolwich, Texas and Boston. If you cannot make it to the battlefield, then bring the battlefield to yourself."
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/isis-jihadi-janes-syria-incite-uk-muslim-women-violence-says-icsr-study-1483971
------------

Haia Objects to Children’s Dance
19 January 2015
The Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, or Haia, in the Qasim region has taken exception to a video clip circulating on social networking sites featuring 8-year-old girls dancing during the ongoing Buraidah Spring Festival in Qasim.
The Haia threatened to punish those responsible for the dance video, despite the fact that members of the Haia committee were present when the dance item was included in the festival, and did not object.
Abdullah Mansour, spokesman for the Haia, denounced the video and said in a press statement that those responsible for organizing the event will be held accountable.
Mansour said that the executive director of the festival affirmed to Haia members that this mistake will not be repeated and that the responsible persons will be punished.
Although the video seemed acceptable and innocent at first, later several social networking sites featured the clip and were met with widespread criticism. Some Twitter users expressed their indignation over the clip and described the little girls as "naked women."
Conservatives exchanged angry words on Twitter with those who supported the dance. The supporters said the video is far from being immoral and showed children dancing.
Many commercial centres in Buraidah and Unaiza witness from time to time such festivals and activities where little girls present songs and poems, including the latest held last weekend, but such events in the past never aroused such media clamour.
http://www.arabnews.com/saudi-arabia/news/691711
------------

Saudi implores authorities not to deport expat wife
18 January 2015
MAKKAH — A Saudi citizen has called on the authorities to issue a residency permit for his pregnant Indonesian wife instead of deporting her, Al-Madinah newspaper reported.
Amro Muhammad Kurdi, 26, married the Indonesian woman, who did not have a residency permit, eight years ago. The couple had a daughter and is expecting their second child as she is seven months pregnant.
“I’m extremely worried about the future of my little daughter and future baby. I know I made a mistake when I married her without obtaining proper approval from the authorities. But my hard financial situation made me do it,” Kurdi said.
Kurdi is unemployed and lives with his wife in a small two-room house, the rent of which is paid by a philanthropist in Makkah. He said high dowries and his poor financial situation made it difficult for him to get married to a Saudi woman.
So, when he started searching for an expatriate to marry, he was told about an orphaned Indonesian woman who was living with a Saudi family. The woman had never seen her homeland and was born and raised in the Kingdom. The couple got married shortly afterwards.
“I’ve tried so many times to apply for a residency permit for my wife but all my attempts were unsuccessful. I spent so much time running back and forth between government agencies trying to issue her the permit,” he said.
He approached the Makkah Police and explained his situation to them and how he wanted to get a residency permit for his wife. But officers told him that his wife was violating residency regulations and would be deported.
He has urged the concerned authorities to help him regularize the status of his wife so the couple can raise their children together.
Lawyer Abdulkarim Al-Qadi said the Interior Ministry is the only authority that can solve the case. He recommended that Kurdi approach the National Society for Human Rights and explain his situation.
http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentid=20150118230825
-------

Woman Admits To Taking Part In Dh2.8m Heist
January 19, 2015
Dubai: Two men have been accused of beating up a company owner in public and stealing Dh2.8 million that he was carrying in a laptop bag.
The Russian duo, 43-year-old M.M. and 35-year-old A.S., were said to have shadowed the Chinese man after he withdrew money from an exchange house and then a bank in Naif before they mugged him in September.
Prosecutors accused the two Russians, who remain at large, of beating the company owner, T.B., in the street and stealing his cash.
A 39-year-old Tajik woman, Z.A., was accused of aiding and abetting the fugitives.
AdTech Ad
M.M. and A.S. did not show up before the Dubai Court of First Instance where they are being tried in absentia.
Meanwhile, Z.A., who is in custody, pleaded guilty and confessed before presiding judge Ezzat Abdul Lat that she kept part of the money.
“I took part of the money from them, but later I gave it to the police. Two weeks prior to the heist, I accompanied the duo to the man’s place… then they mugged him,” she said in courtroom three on Monday.
T.B. testified to prosecutors that he withdrew Dh2 million from the exchange house and Dh800,000 from the bank before he was mugged.
“I own a company that trades in clothes and shoes. I left my home around 2pm and withdrew the cash and put it in the laptop bag. I was walking in front of a hotel while heading back home. Two men [the runaway suspects] took me by surprise and attacked me. They beat me and kicked me… then they snatched the bag and ran away. I did not realise that they had been tailing me since I left my place. They beat me really hard and caused me several bruises that prevented me from chasing them,” the Chinese claimed to prosecutors.
A police lieutenant testified to prosecutors that the Russian duo was caught on surveillance cameras mugging the company owner.
“Primary interrogations also revealed the involvement of Z.A. and a fourth suspect [who used to drive the Chinese man to the bank] in the heist. In October, Z.A. and the fourth man were detained at Al Buraimi checkpoint trying to leave the country. The Tajik and the fourth suspect were not seen on surveillance cameras… however witnesses alleged that they were seated in a car waiting for the duo while they mugged T.B. Police recovered around Dh2 million in Z.A.’s flat in Al Buraimi. The fourth suspect was said to have rented the flat. During questioning, Z.A. admitted that she informed the runaway suspects that the Chinese man was a company owner and constantly received money transfers from abroad. That was when they decided to rob him. Meanwhile, the fourth suspect claimed that he was not aware of the heist,” claimed the lieutenant.
Records said Z.A. had been sentenced to three years in jail followed by deportation for her involvement in a similar case in which she was accused of aiding and abetting in a Dh2 million heist.
The Tajik was said to have participated in the Dh2.8 million heist while she was on bail in the case of Dh2 million heist.
A ruling will be heard on February 26.
http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/uae/courts/woman-admits-to-taking-part-in-dh2-8m-heist-1.1443437
--------

Wahhabi, Ahl-e-Hadeesi Televangelist Zakir Naik Faces Mainstream Muslim Ire at Delhi's India Islamic Centre







By New Age Islam Special Correspondent
18 Jan 2015
A large number of Muslims outside the premises of Delhi's India Islamic Cultural Centre strongly protested against Dr Zakir Naik address at the venue today. They said Dr. Naik has not only offended the sentiments of both Shia and Sunni Muslim sects, but also tried to sabotage the values of national integration, religious harmony, communal affinity and respect for all faiths. Therefore, they said, they did not want Dr. Naik to deliver his lecture at the Centre, which is supposed to promote communal harmony and social amity amongst the peoples of India. IICC is meant to depict the true face of Islam, which is tolerant, liberal, progressive, rational and forward-looking, as claimed by the patrons of IICC themselves.
Radical Islamist preacher and president of the Islamic Research Foundation, Dr Zakir Naik, is a controversial figure. Based in India and a frequent state guest of Saudi Arabia, he has been opposed by many Muslims except those belonging to the Wahhabi-Salafi-Ahle Hadisi alliance. Initially, he was praised by most of the Muslim community when he began his career as televangelist speaking about Islam as a religion of peace and finding similarities in different religions. But he has now earned notoriety for having made incendiary and objectionable utterances on controversial theological issues in Islam as well as other religions. Since then, majority of classical Islamic scholars and erudite Muftis (theologians) and eminent ulema have urged Muslims to shun his speeches and prevent his arrival in their localities. As a result, he was barred, in previous years, from addressing meetings and public gatherings in Allahabad, Kanpur and Lucknow at the urging of local influential ulema as well as the Uttar Pradesh government.
But New Delhi, which is a hub of Dr. Naik’s huge fan club and Ahl-e-Hadeesi followers proved to be a safe haven for him in the last weekend. It was indeed a unique occasion, as the organizing committee of IICC claimed in their advertisements about Zakir Naik’s lecture on social networking sites. They helped him organize his lecture on “Qur’an and Modern Science” on January 17 in the auditorium of IICC.
It was not the first time IICC invited Dr. Naik. He has also been honored by Riyadh Chapter of India Islamic Cultural Centre (IICC) as a guest speaker addressing a group of expatriates during an Iftar Party in the month of Ramadan. The convener of IICC Overseas Chapter Murshid Kamal welcomed Dr. Zakir Naik and presented to him a set of books Idrak-e-Zawal-e-Ummat by a modern salafist author Rashid Shaz. He also conveyed IICC President Sirajuddin Qureshi's good wishes to Dr. Naik on his behalf and invited him to visit India Islamic Cultural Centre in New Delhi.
Apropos the aforementioned invitation offered to him in July 2013 in Riyadh, Dr. Naik arrived in Delhi and addressed the jam-packed auditorium of IICC, New Delhi. 
In his address, Dr. Naik primarily advised the attendees to read Quran with its meaning in the languages whatever are best known and understood to them. After a brief talk on the topic given to him, The Qur’an and Science”, he insisted that he has neither offended the sentiments of any Muslim sect nor uttered a blasphemous word against any doctrine or belief of Islam.
The president of IICC and entrepreneur, Mr. Sirajuddin Quraishi, in his presidential remarks, praised Dr. Naik and his works as an Islamic preacher and evangelist. The IICC’s vice chairman Safdar Husain Khan and Secretary and Supreme Court Advocate Mr. Wasi Ahmad Nomani also spoke in this event, indicating the IICC’s purpose of spreading message of Islam and contribution to the society by promoting mutual understanding and other services to the society.
 Challenging the IICC’s tall claims of serving the nation and holding aloft the cause of communal harmony, Muslims protesting against Dr. Naik outside IICC demanded an explanation from the IICC organizing committee to explain the intent behind the invitation to Dr. Naik, who according to them is a divisive figure. The protestors came from different and divergent Muslim groups and organizations. Even many members of the IICC themselves were among the angry protestors. Noted social activist and IICC member Mr. Anjum Zaidi, who was one of the organizers of the protest said, "The Government of India did not give land for the centre to give a platform to such hate mongers”.
Regrettably, Mr. Zahir Zaidi, who is also an active member of the IICC screening committee, was denied entry, mistreated and even manhandled by the supporters of Zakir Naik when he tried to enter the auditorium. According to the report published in Urdu daily Sahafat, although Mr. Zaidi told the violent mob of Naik’s fans that he was a prominent member of the IICC and a part of the committee who approves of the events in its auditorium, he was not only abused and manhandled but also threatened to be beaten up badly. Those threatening Mr. Zaidi were loudly clamming to be strong supporters of Zakir Naik and hence they forced Mr. Zaidi and all others protesters to keep away from the auditorium. Expressing his remorse over the mistreatment meted out to him by the supporters of Zakir Naik, Syed Zaheer Zaidi told the media that “Dr. Naik, who indoctrinates the Indian youths into fanaticism, was welcomed to the IICC despite our categorical opposition expressed to Sirajuddin Quraishi, the President of IICC. However, he said: “this violence and hooliganism cannot be tolerated by us at any cost”.      
A surging crowd of the protestors were merging ahead under the banners of numerous Sunni-Sufi organisations, most notably the All India Ulema Mashaikh Board and Sada-e-Sufiya-e-Hind (Voice of Indian Mystics). Along with the adherents of Sufism, followers of Shia Muslims were also in this massive protest against the radical Salafi-Wahhabi preacher’s extreme views.
These Sunni and Shia organisations jointly protested under the umbrella of Sada-e-Sufia-e-Hind (Sufi Voice Of India). Distressed and angered, their volunteers and many common Muslims outside IICC were shouting against Zakir Naik, the IICC President Sirajuddin Qureshi and Vice President Safdar Khan.
President of Sada-e-Sufia-e-Hind, Syed Babar Ashraf stated: “that Zakir Naik hurt the religious sentiments of all Muslim sects along with other faiths is not unknown to Indian people.
SUVOI President further said that “Zakir Naik is on record about Osama Bin Laden, whom he refuses to acknowledge as a terrorist. Naik believes that it is wrong to accuse bin Laden of terrorism based on the news reports of BBC.” “Dr. Naik can be seen on YouTube justifying suicide attacks” said Syed Babar Ashraf.
Complaints are also reported to have been filed against Dr. Naik and the IICC organizers of his event in the Tughlak Road police station. In his complaint, Syed Babar briefed that several police complaints and FIRs have been filed against Zakir Naik for making derogatory comments about different faiths causing communal disharmony and hurting religious sentiments. “The Bombay High Court has asked Zakir Naik to appear before the Vengurla police in Sindhudurg district and get his statement recorded in connection with a case registered there for allegedly hurting religious sentiments”, he said.
In one of his lectures when Naik was asked whether Osama Bin Laden was doing Jihad, he replied: “If he (OBL) is terrorizing the biggest terrorist (America) then, I endorse him.” Indeed, it’s a matter of great regret that a person who was responsible for the murder of thousands of people including Muslims was lionized by Dr. Naik.
SUVOI President exposed that Zakir Naik’s Peace TV is one of the illegally broadcasted foreign channels in India. He added saying: “Answering an unstarred question (No. 1819 on 4/12/2102) in the Lok Sabha, Minister of State in the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting stated that “The content of this channel (Peace TV) is not conducive to the security environment in the country and poses a potential security hazard”.
It is also noteworthy that Zakir Naik’s Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) was extensively featured on the website of Jamaat-ud-Dawa, the parent religious and political organisation of the notorious Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), an outfit declared terrorist under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.
For Muslims the most controversial of Dr Naik’s statements, however, came relating to Yazid, the quintessential villain in Muslim history, who was responsible for the killing of the revered grandson of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and son of Hazrat Imam Ali (r.a), Hazrat Imam Husain (r.a) in the battle of Karbala in 680 AD. In a grand public conference in December 2007 in Mumbai, Dr. Naik used the words of high reverence “Radiallah Tala Anho” (May Allah be pleased with him) referring to Yazid, which outraged the audience. This expression went completely against the belief of Sufi-Sunni Muslims and Shia Muslims alike. Also, it was a cognizable offence under 295 (A), 296 and 298 of Indian Penal Code for hurting religious sentiments of Sufi-Sunni and Shia Muslims of India.
Talking to New Age Islam, some of the protestors including madrasa students, university graduates, Sufi shrine patrons and mainstream Muslims said they got alarmed learning that Dr. Zakir Naik, propagandist of the exclusivist and exclusionary Wahhabi ideology had been invited by India Islamic Cultural Centre (IICC) to address a religious gathering. They held that Dr. Naik’s address to the Muslims of Delhi should be a matter of great worry for anybody who has even a superficial understanding of the Wahhabi ideology and activities of his ahl-e-Hadeesi organisation. “That Zakir Naik is a strident exponent of the radical Wahhabi ideology is common knowledge. Therefore, his arrival and address in Delhi will further exacerbate the delicate social situation in the capital. This is precisely why several state governments and other some foreign countries have disallowed his entry. Obliviously, they are afraid of promotion of communal feelings posing threat to India's multiculturalism”, they said.


Thy Freedom Is Divine, My Freedom Is Vice!




By M. Burhanuddin Qasmi for New Age Islam
19 January, 2014
Freedom of speech or freedom of expression is the phrase popular in the Western part of our planet in the recent weeks. People are dancing, singing and crying; on streets, market places and at newsrooms, for a single thing – they call freedom of speech. They say it is their ‘democratic value’, some even claim it is their ‘lifeline’. It is good for all and it is absolute, they say.
On the contrary, there are some others who are dying because of the same phrase. We see wars, bloodsheds, burnings, lootings and all that is classified as crime or uncivilized linked with this very phrase freedom of speech. If it is good for all then how can it cause violence and disorder among us? Or is it essentially an evil that some sick people are dragging us to hell? What exactly this freedom of speech is!
Ironically some in the East too started suffering from a kind of untreatable intellectual disorder. They say freedom of speech is absolute. You can speak anything against anybody at anytime, anywhere and in anyway; wow - can you?
Does it mean one can abuse others, can insult, can lie, be it an individual, a society or an entity; be it a government, a god-man or God- and what not, one is ‘absolutely’ free to speak! Does it mean one can propagate against his own country, his faith and even disrespect his parents who have nourished him with care and abuse his Lord who has created him from a drop of water! May be yes for some because their freedom of speech is ‘absolute’ – means unlimited, unchecked, thus, ‘divine’, isn’t it?
Our freedom of speech is restricted and all we can speak or do is within certain limits. We are just humans, not God who can do anything and everything nor animals which do not enjoy the faculty of wisdom. We do not find either, a place to do and say anything or everything being ‘absolutely free’ other than in a jungle.
What we understand from freedom of speech is a political right to communicate one's opinions and ideas using one's physical means to anyone who is willing to receive them. Every government in the world restricts freedom of speech to a certain degree.
Common limitations on speech relate to libel, slander, obscenity, pornography, sedition, hate speech, incitement, abuse, fighting words, classified information, copyright violation, trade secrets, non-disclosure agreements, and right to privacy, right to be forgotten, public security, public order, and public nuisance and so on.
The term "offense principle" was specially added to expand the range of free speech limitations to prohibit forms of expression where they are considered offensive to society, special interest groups or individuals. For example, freedom of speech is limited in many jurisdictions to widely differing degrees by religious legal systems, religious offense or incitement to ethnic or racial hatred laws.
However, freedom itself is not absolute anywhere, let alone freedom of speech, not even in the USA where laws against anti-Semitism are enforced. Not in France where a Burqa-clad Muslim woman is considered to be a ‘real’ threat to its ‘secular democratic’ pyramid. It is not in Switzerland either where an RCC structure – a minaret of a Masjid is considered to be cruise-missile against its ‘democratic values’. And more so it is not in the ‘symbol of freedom of speech’ (sick) Charlie Hebdo magazine too which fired its own cartoonist- Sine in 2009 just because he had mocked former President Sarkozy’s son converting to Judaism for money through his caricature.
We also know that the right to freedom of expression is recognized as a human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and recognized in international human rights law under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 19 of the ICCPR states, "Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference" and "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression...”
Article 19 goes on to say that the exercise of these rights carries "special duties and responsibilities" and may "therefore be subject to certain restrictions" when necessary "for respect of the rights or reputation of others" or "for the protection of national security or of public order, or of public health or morals".
This is our freedom of speech and is not absolute. It carries certain responsibilities and is not evil or vice. We are not, and we don’t want to support Charlie Hebdo to incite 1.7 billion Muslims and insult Prophet Muhammad (saws).
M. Burhanuddin Qasmi is Editor of Eastern Crescent and Director of Markazul Ma’arif Education and Research Centre, Mumbai.

Violence and Intolerance Over Ideological Disagreements are Nothing Short of Barbarism علمی اور فکری اختلافات پر تشدد حیوانیت کے سوا کچھ نہیں




ایازا میر
14 جنوری، 2015
آپ تحریر کردہ لفظ سے اختلاف کا حق رکھتے ہیں،ا سکرین پر دکھائے جانے والے مناظر کے بارے میں آپ کی ایک رائے ہوسکتی ہے، بنائے گئے کارٹونوں پر آپ مسکرا کر آگے بڑھ سکتے ہیں یا چراغ پاہوسکتے ہیں، تاہم ان کے جواب میں آپ کا رد ِعمل کیا ہونا چاہئے؟ تحریر کا جواب آپ تحریر سے دے سکتے ہیں جبکہ کارٹون کا جواب یہ ہوسکتا ہے کہ یا تو آپ اسے نظر انداز کردیں یا اس پر تنقیدکرتے ہوئے اپنے غصے کا اظہار کریں اور آگے بڑھ جائیں۔
لیکن ہمیں اپنے عقیدے کی کون سی چیز مجبور کرتی ہے کہ جو کچھ ہمیں ناپسندہو یا جس پر ہمیں اشتعال آجائے، اس پر ہم تشدد اور مرنے مارنے پر اتر آئیں؟ہاں، اگر ظلم و جبر ہو تو اس کے مقابلے پر زبان کھولنا، بلکہ گولی تک چلاناایک قابل ِ قدر جذبہ قرار دیا جاسکتا ہے، لیکن علمی اور فکری اختلاف پر تشدد کرنا جہالت اور حیوانیت کے سوا اور کچھ نہیں۔ دنیا بھر کے کتب خانے ایسے مواد سے بھرے ہوئے ہیں جو ہمیں پسند نہیں۔ دانتے اور گبن کی تصنیفات میں ایسے پیراگراف موجود ہیں جوکسی عام مولوی کوغصے پاگل کردیں ، لیکن کیا ہم منگول اور تاتاری لشکر ہیں جولائبریریوں کو نذر ِ آتش کرکے دریائوں کو کتابوں کی راکھ سے بھر دیں؟ہم کتنے ’’بغداد ‘‘جلا سکتے ہیں اور کتنے ’’دریائے فرات‘‘ راکھ اور خون سے بھر سکتے ہیں؟ میں نے سلمان رشدی کی کتاب ’’شیطانی آیات‘‘ پڑھنے کی کوشش کی لیکن طبیعت پر انتہائی ناگوار بوجھل پن کا احساس ہوا۔ اور پھر اسے پڑھنا کسی کی مجبوری بھی نہیں۔ کیلی فورنیا کے کسی پاگل کی بنائی ہوئی گھٹیا درجے کی فلم دیکھنے کے لئے کس کے پا س وقت ہے؟تاہم اس کی وجہ سے دنیائے اسلام میں ایک ہنگامہ بپا ہوگیا حالانکہ زیادہ تر افراد نے اسے دیکھا تک نہیں تھا۔ اگر اس پر کوئی رد ِعمل نہ ہوتا توایسی فلم کادنیا کو علم تک نہیں ہونا تھا۔تاہم اس کی وجہ سے پاکستان میں یوٹیوب بند کردی گئی اور کسی حکومت کو اسے کھولنے کی ہمت نہیں ہوئی۔ اب یہی حکومت، جو ملائوں کے ڈر سے یوٹیوب بھی کھول سکتی، نے انتہا پسندوں کے خلاف جنگ لڑنی ہے۔ پاکستانی دانش میں ایسے شگوفوں کی بھی کمی نہیںکہ سینڈی نامی جس طوفان نے نیویارک کے ساحلی علاقوں میں تباہی مچائی، اس کی وجہ توہین آمیز فلم تھی۔ کسی نے نہ سوچا کہ وہ گستاخانہ فلم کیلی فورنیا میںبنی جو کہ مغربی ساحل پر ہے جبکہ طوفان امریکہ کے دوسری طرف آیا۔ سینڈی کا اُس فلم سے تعلق جوڑنے والے کیا یہ کہنے کی کوشش کررہے تھے کہ آسمانی طاقتیں جغرافیے کا زیادہ علم نہیں رکھتیں؟
مغرب میں آزادی ِ اظہار کے بارے میں بہت کچھ کہا جاسکتا ہے۔تاہم جب اسرائیل کے بارے میں لب کشائی کی جاتی ہے تو اس آزادی کی حدود حیرت انگیز حد تک سمٹ جاتی ہیں۔اگر امریکی مین اسٹریم میڈیا سے تعلق رکھنے والا کوئی رپورٹر مغربی کنارے پر اسرائیلی کی طرف سے روا رکھے جانے والے مظالم پر قلم اٹھائے تو اُسے اپنی ملازمت بچانا مشکل ہوجاتا ہے۔ کیاکوئی امریکی رکن ِ کانگریس یا سینیٹر برملا ، کھلے لفظوں میں، اسرائیل کے مظالم کے بارے میں بات کرسکتا ہے؟اس پر یہ بات پوچھی جاسکتی ہے کہ کیا آزادی ِ اظہار کا تعلق صرف ایسے مواد کی اشاعت سے ہی ہے جو اس کرہ ِ ارض کے کروڑوں انسانوں کی دل آزاری کرنے کا موجب ہو؟ تاہم اصل سوال اپنی جگہ پر موجود ہے کہ اب کوئی مواد ہمیں ناپسندہے یا اُس کی وجہ سے ہمارے جذبات مجروح ہوتے ہیں تو اس پر ہمارا ردِعمل کیا ہونا چاہئے؟کیا اس کو جواز بنا کر قتل وغارت کی جاسکتی ہے؟مغرب میں بہت سے معاملات پر دہرے روئیے پائے جاتے ہیں۔ امریکہ اور برطانیہ نے دروغ گوئی سے کام لیتے ہوئے عراق پر حملہ کیا۔ ان کے مکر و فریب کی داستان بہت طویل ہے لیکن اسلام، یا کوئی اور مذہب صرف کسی مواد کی اشاعت ،چاہے وہ کتناہی اشتعال انگیز کیوں نہ ہو، کی وجہ سے صحافیوں اور بے گناہ شہریوں کو ہلاک کرنے کی اجازت کس طرح دے سکتا ہے؟ہم اس روئیے کو کیا نام دیں؟ فسطائیت کی یہ نئی شکل عقیدے کی غلط تشریح کا شاخسانہ ہے۔ عیسائیت، یا اس کی بگڑی ہوئی شکل یا نتیجہ Inquisition تھیں جب ہزاروں افراد کو چڑیل قرار دے کر موت کے گھاٹ اتارا گیا۔امریکہ میں اس کی شکل میکارتھی ازم(McCarthyism)کی صورت دیکھنے میں آئی ۔ امریکی جمہوریت نے میکارتھی ازم کو بھی برداشت کیا اور سیاہ فام شہریوں کو کچلنے والی تحریک Ku Klux Klan کو بھی۔آج کی کہانی مختلف ہے کیونکہ مذہب (اسلام) کو بنیاد بنا کر تشدد کا جواز پیدا کیا جارہا ہے....شہریوں کو بم دھماکوں میں ہلاک کرنا، قیدیوں کے گلے کاٹنا، صحافیوں کو ہلاک کرنا اوراسکول کے بچوں کو فائرنگ کر کے قتل کرنا۔
اگرچہ اچھا مسلمان ہونے کا دعویٰ نہیں لیکن یہ دیکھ کر سخت صدمہ پہنچتا ہے کہ ا سکول کے بچوں اور ان کے اساتذہ پر گولیاں برساتے ہوئے قاتل ’’اﷲ اکبر‘‘ کے نعرے بلند کررہے ہوں۔ اسی طرح یہ بات بھی میرے انتہائی تکلیف دہ ہے کہ پیرس میں شارلی ہیبڈو کے دفاتر پر حملہ کرنے والے مسلح قاتل بھی نعرہ ٔ تکبیر بلند کررہے ہوں۔ میں یہ بات قبول کرنے کے لئے تیار نہیں کہ ایسی قتل وغارت گری کاخدا سے کوئی تعلق نکلتا ہے، لیکن گلے کاٹنا، عبادت گاہوں، جیسا کہ مساجد، چرچوں اور مزارات پر حملے کرنا، اہل ِ تشیع کو چن چن کر ہلاک کرنا اور تعلیم حاصل کرنے والے بچوں کوخون میں نہلا دینااسلام کے نام پر ہی کیا جارہا ہے۔ کیا یہ اسلام ہے؟ اور پھر ہمارے ہاں ایسے لوگوں کی بھی کمی نہیں جو طالبان کے لئے دل میں نرم گوشہ رکھتے ہیں، اس لئے وہ ان روح فرسا واقعات کی کھل کر مذمت بھی نہیں کرتے… یا پھر ہو سکتا ہے کہ وہ طالبان سے خوفزدہ ہوں اور ابھی اپنی گردن نہیں کٹوانا چاہتے ہوں۔
یہاں کچھ نہ کچھ بنیادی غلطی موجود ہے۔ رائف بداوی(Raif Badawi)، جو کہ بلاگ لکھنے والے ایک عرب ملک کےشہری ہیں ، کو اس ملک کے ایک مسلک رکھنے والے علما پر تنقید کرنے کی پاداش میں دس سال قید اور ایک ہزار کوڑوں کی سزاسنائی گئی ہے۔ جمعے کی نماز کے بعد اُسے پچاس کوڑوں کی پہلی ’’قسط‘‘ دی گئی.....اُسے اگلے بیس ہفتوں تک ہر جمعہ پچاس کوڑے مارے جائیں گے۔ سلیوٹ ہے مسٹر رائف کو کیونکہ اُنھوںنے اپنی آنکھیں بند رکھیں اور کوڑے لگنے کے دوران اُن کے منہ سے ایک آہ تک نہ نکلی۔کیا اس جرم پر اُسے ملنی والی سزا اسلام کی توہین نہیں؟ تھائی لینڈ میں بادشاہ کی توہین کرنے کے خلاف سخت قوانین ہیں۔ کیا اسلام تھائی لینڈ کے بادشاہ جیسا ہے کہ اس کی اتنی آسانی سے توہین ہوجاتی ہے؟ہمارے اپنے ہاں رائج توہین کے قوانین کا جائزہ لیں۔ بطور ایک پاکستانی میرا سر شرم سے جھک جاتا ہے جب میں ایک غریب عیسائی عورت ، آسیہ بی بی ، کے بارے میں سوچتا ہوں کہ وہ ایک مقدس کتاب کا ایک لفظ بھی نہیں پڑھ سکتی لیکن اُسے توہین کے الزام میں سزائے موت سنائی گئی ہے۔ یہ ظاہر کرکے کہ یہ اس آفاقی مذہب کی عظمت کو ایک غریب اور لاچار عور ت سے خطرہ ہے، ہم اسلام کی کوئی خدمت نہیں کررہے ہیں۔
ہم نے دیکھا ہے کہ انقلاب ،چاہے وہ انقلاب ِروس ہو، یاچین ، کیوبا اور ویت نام کے انقلاب ہوں، ان کی رہنمائی ذہین افراد نے کی۔ اگر اُن کے ایک ہاتھ میں بندوق تھی تو دوسرے میں کتاب ۔ وہ بہت عظیم جدوجہد کی داستانیں تھیں اور اُن میں بہت خونریزی بھی ہوئی اور انسانی المیے نے بھی جنم لیا، تاہم کیا کبھی سنا کہ کسی نے قیدیوں کے گلے کاٹے ، بچوں کو ہدف بنا کر قتل کیا یا عبادت گاہوں کو بموں سے اُڑایا ؟کیا ویت نامی باشندوں نے امریکہ کے ہاتھ تکلیف نہیں اٹھائی؟لیکن کیا اُنھوں نے سیاگون اور جنوبی ویت نام کے شہروں میں شہریوں کو قتل کیا؟امریکیوں نے بھی درندگی کی انتہا کردی.... نیپام بم اور کیمیائی ہتھیار بھی استعمال کیے، کارپٹ بمباری کی ، لیکن کیا کسی نے بچوں کو ہدف بنا کر گولیاں ماریں یا ذبح کیا؟اس کے علاوہ ہمیں یہ بات فراموش نہیں کرنی چاہئے کہ وہ جدوجہد کسی الہامی عقیدے کو جواز بنا کرنہیں بلکہ اپنے وطن کو آزاد کرنے کے لئے تھی اور اُن کو کسی آسمانی نجات کی تلاش نہیں تھی بلکہ وطن کی آزادی ہی سب سے بڑا انعام تھا۔ تاہم دنیائے اسلام میں سراٹھانے والے مذہبی شدت پسند گروہ انقلابی نہیں بلکہ اُنھوں نے عقید ے کی غلط تشریح سے سر کاٹنے کا جواز اخذ کیا ہوا ہے۔ وہ ذہنی طور پر معاشرے کے پست ترین افراد ہیں اوروہ طاقت کے بے رحم استعمال سے معاشروں پر اپنی سوچ مسلط کرنا چاہتے ہیں۔
اب ہمارے پاس متبادل کیا ہے؟ رجعت پسندی سے جنم لینے والی مذہبی انتہا پسندی اور اسلامی دہشت گردی کے مقابلے میں ہم کیا کرسکتے ہیں؟دنیا ئے اسلام میں زیادہ تر غیر جمہوری حکومتیں اپنی آمریت اور جابرانہ سوچ مسلط کیے ہوئے ہیں۔ نام اسلام کا لیتے ہیں لیکن ناچتے مغربی دھنوں پر ہیں!اگر آپ داعش کی بات نہ مانیں تو سرقلم اور اگر کسی مسلک پر تنقید کریں تو ایک ہزار کوڑے۔ ستم یہ ہے کہ ہماری آزادی انہی دو آپشنز کے گرد گھومتی ہے۔ سوال پیدا ہوتا ہے کہ اسلام کی حقیقت سمجھنے والا دانائے راز کہاں سے آئے گا؟یاپھر سرود ِ رفتہ کا وقت جاچکا ہے اور اب کہیں سے بھی باد ِ نسیم نہیں آئے گی اور ہم اپنی تاریخ کے آپ ہی قیدی بن کر ذبح ہونے یا کوڑے کھانے کا انتظار کریں گے؟
14 جنوری، 2015  بشکریہ : روز نامہ جنگ، کراچی
URL:

Why Muslims Hate Zakir Naik so Much? आखिर मुसलमान जाकिर नाइक से इतनी नफरत क्यों करते हैं?




अगनी वीर
जाकिर भाई एम बी बी एस जो डॉ जाकिर नाइक के नाम से भी जाने जाते हैं, आज की तारीख में सबसे ज्यादा लानत पाने वाले शख्स हैं. यह लानत उन पर कोई और मजहब के लोग नहीं लेकिन खुद उनके मजहब इस्लाम के मानने वाले ही भेजते हैं. दुनिया के नामी और हिन्दुस्तान, पाकिस्तान में सबसे बड़े तालीमी इदारे (शैक्षिक संस्थान) दारुल उलूम देवबंद ने कुछ अरसा पहले जाकिर भाई के खिलाफ फतवा लगाया है. इसमें कोई शक नहीं कि जाकिर भाई पिछले कुछ साल में मजहबी बाजार में सबसे ज्यादा कीमत पाने वालों में से एक हैं. वे खुद को इस्लाम का खिदमतगार (सेवक) बताते हैं और दावा करते हैं कि वे नए लोगों तक इस्लाम को पहुंचाते हैं. खुद को अल्लाह और मुहम्मद का अदना खिदमतगार कहते हैं. खुद को इस्लाम और दीगर मजाहिब (दूसरे धर्मों) का आलिम (विद्वान) भी कहते हैं! पर फिर भी उन पर सबसे ज्यादा लानत भेजने वाले और नफरत करने वाले मुसलमान ही हैं. इस लेख में हम उन वजूहात (कारणों) की तहकीक करेंगे कि जिससे जाकिर भाई मुसलमान भाइयों की नजरों में पहले शख्स हैं जो जहन्नम में भेजे जायेंगे! अधिक जानने के लिए गूगल पर “we hate zakir naik” डालें और देखें.
यहाँ हमारे पढने वालों के लिए इस्लाम का थोड़ा राफ्ता (परिचय) कराना जरूरी है. अधिकतर लोग यह समझते हैं कि इस्लाम वह मजहब है जो कि मुहम्मद (सल्लo) ने फैलाया और जो कुरान में लिखा है. कुरान कहती है कि जो आदमी मुहम्मद (सल्लo) के कहे पर ईमान लाएगा वह जन्नत में जाएगा जहां उसे बहुत सी जवान लड़कियां (जिनके हुस्न और बदन की खूबियाँ हदीसों और दूसरी इस्लाम की पाक किताबों में मिलती हैं, मसलन उनका जिस्म शीशे की तरह आरपार दिखाई देने वाला, आँखें मोटी, छाती…. वगैरह वगैरह), बहुत से मोतियों के मानिंद लड़के जो जन्नत में शराब के प्याले लिए अपने मालिक की शान में सदा फिरते रहेंगे, शराब के दरया और पंछियों का गोश्त और भी बहुत कुछ. कुरान पर अमल करने की बात वैसे तो देखने में सीधी लगती है पर यह इतनी सीधी है नहीं. ऐसा इसलिए कि केवल यह कह देने से कि कुरान पर अमल करो, काम नहीं चलता. हर आलिम अपने तरीके से कुरान के मतलब निकालता है और यही वजह है कि कुरान एक मानने पर भी मुसलमानों में आज बहत्तर (७२) से भी ज्यादे फिरके (वर्ग) हैं. हरेक फिरका खुद को असली इस्लाम और दूसरों को दोजखी (नरकगामी) करार देता है. पैगम्बर मुहम्मद (सल्लo) की कुछ हदीस हैं जो अबू दाउद और तिरमिधि में मिलती हैं जो इस तरह है-
अबू दाउद, किताब 40, हदीस 4579: नबी ने फरमाया कि यहूदी इकहत्तर या बहत्तर (७१ या ७२) फिरकों में बंट गए. ईसाई भी बहत्तर फिरकों में बंटे. मेरी उम्मत तिहत्तर (७३) फिरकों में बंटेगी. “
तिहत्तर फिरकों में से केवल एक फिरका ही सच्चा है जो जन्नत में जाएगा, बाकी सब जहन्नम की आग में जलाए जायेंगे.” [तिरमिधि और अबू दाऊद]
तो मसला अब यह है कि मुहम्मद (सल्लo) की बात झूठी नहीं हो सकती और इसलिए इस्लाम में मौजूद आज तिहत्तर फिरकों में से बहत्तर तो काफिरों के साथ ही दोजख की आग में जलेंगे. तो यही वजह है कि इस्लाम के फिरके सुन्नी, शिया, वहाबी, सूफी, कादियानी और इसी तरह न जाने कितने ही फिरके अपने को सच्चा और बाकी ७२ को झूठा साबित करने मिल लगे रहते हैं. हालांकि कुछ फिरके काफिरों पर भी गम खाने वाले हैं और उन्हें भी जन्नत नसीब होने की ख्वाहिश करते हैं लेकिन ये बहुत थोड़े हैं. अधिकतर तो वे ही हैं जो काफिरों को अल्लाह और रसूल का दुश्मन समझ कर उन पर लानत भेजते हैं. वे केवल ऐसा कहते नहीं, लेकिन बमबारी करके जताते भी हैं. काफिर को तो छोड़ें, आज मुस्लिम दुनिया में अधिकतर जगहों पर जबरदस्त फिरकापरस्ती (सम्प्रदायवाद) है जैसे कि पाकिस्तान में आये दिन कभी कादियानियों की मस्जिद उड़ा दी जाती है तो कभी शिया नमाजियों को सरे आम भून दिया जाता है.
पर देखिये! फिरकों में बंटी और लगातार बंटती जा रही मुस्लिम उम्मत के इस हाल पर भी जाकिर भाई इस्लाम को “सबसे तेज फैलता हुआ मजहब” (fastest growing religion) करार देते हैं! वैसे उन्होंने आजतक यह नहीं बताया कि वह सच्चा फिरका कौन सा है जिसकी तरफ मुहम्मद (सल्लo) का इशारा था. खैर, इस्लाम में फिरकापरस्ती हमारे इस लेख का मौजू (विषय) नहीं. इस्लाम के ७३ फिरकों में सबसे इन्तेहापसंद (अतिवादी) और दहशतगर्द (आतंकवादी) फिरका वहाबी है.यह फिरका अपने वजूद में आने से (अट्ठारहवीं सदी) लेकर आज तक बड़े बड़े दहशतगर्दों जैसे ओसामा बिन लादेन, अल कायदा को पैदा करने के लिए जाना जाता है. इस्लाम के असली मायने “शांति=अमन” का अगर किसी फिरके ने सबसे ज्यादा मजाक बनाया है तो यह वहाबी ही है. जाकिर भाई का ताल्लुक इस फिरके से ही बताया जाता है. लेकिन यहीं पर बस नहीं है! जाकिर भाई वहाबी रिवायतों में कभी कभी ऐसे फिरकों की रिवायतों के तड़के भी लगा दिया करते हैं कि हांडी लजीज होने के बजाये कड़वी हो जाती है! अपनी इस नयी हांडी का नाम वे इस्लाम रखते हैं लेकिन असल में उनके इस खेल ने इस्लाम की धज्जियां उड़ा के रख दी हैं. और इस वजह से अब इस्लाम के सब बड़े बड़े फिरके उन पर फतवे दे चुके हैं. दारुल उलूम देवबंद, शिया, कादियानी सब के सब कह चुके हैं कि जाकिर नाइक को इस्लाम का दावा करने का हक़ ही नहीं है. यह सब कैसे हुआ, एक एक करके देखते हैं कि कैसे जाकिर भाई ने बड़ी चालाकी से अपने नाम के लिए इस्लाम का मजाक उड़ाया यहाँ तक कि पैगम्बर मुहम्मद (सल्लo) की सारी दुनिया में हंसी उडवाई.
Source: http://agniveer.com/hate-zakir-hi/

Sunday, November 9, 2014


Radical Islamism and Jihad 
Sultan Shahin, Editor, New Age Islam
Facing massive appeal of Radical Islam, Moderate Muslims must refute Jihadist theology of violence with a coherent narrative of Islamic moderation, says Sultan Shahin at UNHRC in Geneva
Sultan Shahin, Editor, New Age Islam
We, the silent majority of moderate Muslims are disoriented. Can those Muslims who cherish democracy, peace, and pluralism still have a say in world affairs? Only a tiny fraction of one and a half billion Muslims see in the Quran and Hadees a permission to kill innocents from other sects and communities. But Islam or Islamism is being equated with terrorism because the vast majority of Muslims are still passive and silent.
Thirteen years after 9/11, the Islamist terrorist threat has become more diverse, more complex, and more dangerous. It seems that while the world has focused on fighting the terrorists militarily, it has not faced the challenge of the ideological narrative that Jihadism offers. It is this Islamist extremist narrative that has gained momentum now, animating not only groups like al-Qaeda, Taliban, Boko Haram, al Nusra, ISIS, etc but also independent actors who may prove even more dangerous. ...
What are we, the Muslim moderates, doing wrong? Why are our youth joining the radicals?
What has happened is that Jihadists have worked out a radical narrative of Islam, a complete theology of violence, xenophobia, hate and Islam-supremacism based on common Muslim beliefs which they are using to brainwash Muslim youth, while we moderates have no coherent narrative or theology of peace, pluralism, co-existence and gender justice to counter that.
So what is the way forward? In my view, this situation calls for a clear refutation of the Jihadist ideology and working out a coherent narrative and a consistent theology of Islamic moderation, peace and gender justice. If not now, when?.....