Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Can A Muslim Ever Be Anti-Semitic?


By Rashid Samnakay, New Age Islam
28 January 2017
Around the Mediterranean coast almost all countries and those of the Middle East are supposed to be Semitic people speaking Arabic and other Semitic languages, such as Hebrew language that the Jews consider as their religious and national language, and therefore they all are counted as Semitic people.
For the Muslim nation as a whole, which considers Saudi Arabia, the cradle of Islam and the birth place of Messenger Muhammad, a samite, cannot by any stretch of imagination be branded as anti-Semitic. That would be thoroughly blasphemous. Therefore to say that Muslims, as followers of the faith Islam are anti-Semitic is compounding the felony since they, just as the Jews claim to be of the “nation of Ibrahim” because they follow the faith established by Aba Abraham, long before Moses and Muhammad were born.
Today anti-Semitism is exclusively taken as “hating the Jews”. In Europe, both the West and the East, which is not Semitic, hatred of Jews and persecution is well-documented history and well established practice of anti-Semitism there; culminating in the holocaust of six million Jews. The word holocaust is therefore exclusively applied today to the elimination policy of Jews in Germany, a European country and not a North African, Middle Eastern country, or Palestine. The later, country which gave the Jews sanctuary since Moses time!
Let us commemorate today, along with the Jews, the victims of that dreadful event called the holocaust, perpetrated in Europe!
The Christian Church in general and Catholic Church in particular have been scathing of Jews on religious ground and critical of its Zionist manifestation, till very recently. It was in our lifetime that Pope John Paul II who should be thanked for reversing the well-established Jew-hating culture of Europe.
There were very many people on both sides of the argument-fence, supporting or condemning the Jews/Zionists. But their actions, since the formation of the State of Israel are a bone of contention. There are even famous people who deny the holocaust, unbelievable as it may seem!
Such condemnation has in some quarters taken the form of hatred of Jews and can be considered as anti-Semitic but to generalise any legitimate criticism of Israel, its creators, its supporters as anti-Semitisms, is brattish, a sign of immaturity and a complex of insecurity on the part of Jews.
Zionism is considered by many as apartheid of the old South African kind practiced under the banner of Christianity, racism and colonialism of the worst kind and compared to conquistadors of South America. Expulsion of Palestinians and violence against them has become the hallmark of Zionist Israel. Not surprisingly the Reformed Jews were against the “return” to Palestine on religious pretext.
The Palestinians people as major stake holders were not even consulted and were not included in the negotiation process to grant their land to the Jews. Goodly sounding promises by the powers to be were made and humanitarian pledges given in political statement which were clearly not meant to be honoured and were not ever honoured.
Israel, the Jewish/Zionist State’s insecurity stems from its callous, unthankful and immoral actions of biting the hands that had nourished them with mana from heaven from the time of Moses who sought refuge with his few followers in Palestine, to escape from the brutalities of Pharaoh.
Thus Palestinian nation comprises of many different people including Jews; and Moses followers who settled there later.  Palestine was never a Tera nullius as Zionist would have us believe. So it has never been an exclusive Jewish land to claim as its own. They were settled there under some given conditions – a “covenant” with God which they had broken number of times, hence lost the land as many times.
Recently, after the WWII, in sympathy for the Jews for having suffered persecution at their hands the Europeans felt pangs of conscience and supported the idea of giving the Jews land of their own. Perhaps also expecting as a by-product a solution in it to solve the problems they were causing in their countries. To that effect large piece of land was “offered to them in Uganda or Argentina” as if it was Tera nullius, said historian Professor Ali Mazrui of East Africa; which offer the Jews rejected. They wanted the holy land promised by God in spite of the fact God had bestowed it upon them number of times before and finally withdrew His favour on account of them having broken the “covenant” as many times. God is merciful but He too has His limit for He has to be fair and just!
The persecution of Palestinians by the Israelis is therefore all the more strange. Having been driven from one country to another over centuries, of all the people they should be more understanding of what it means to drive people from their home and hearth. Then also they are the people of the Book and no Book advocates such acts in its true essence. Thankfulness is a virtue. The insecurity of the Zionists is therefore resultant self- generated.
The Palestinians, particularly the land holders and feudal lords are also to be blamed. They sold their lands to the Zionists at asking prices and are enjoying themselves in foreign lands. Now the landless Palestinians are suffering the consequences of the greed, corruption and treachery of the elite. In addition to that the Palestinians are divided amongst themselves and divided people can never succeed to achieve a common goal.
There are other people and foreign nations too involved in maintaining the status quo for their vested interest. It seems that is the politics of the powers on earth.
Criticism of Zionist Israel is valid on many fronts, but to say that this criticism is anti-Semitism on the part of Muslims; as was the case with Catholic Church till recently, is naïve. Particularly in the context of Muslims in general, for they consider the Jews as their brethren in Faith. But the Israelis have adopted the stance that any criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic and immediately draw out that card, or hoist the holocaust flag!
The holocaust did occur; whether six million or six matters not. One does not have to wait for the Jews to displace and kill six million Palestinians for the world to accept it as holocaust. Even one such life taken is genocide of a nation and that is the justification for criticism, irrespective of who perpetrates the crime; Muslims, Semites and non-Semites. Man’s inhumanity to man recognises no boundaries and has not stopped from time immemorial!
Palestine could be and should be the multi-faith Capital State of the so called people of the Book, brethren in faith. If only Moses or Muhammad would reappear to sort this out it would be better for humanity as a whole. But alas neither of them is expected to do so and it is too late and beyond the ken of the likes of Aba Abraham!
The solution must lie in the sincerity of good intentions of those who masquerade as policeman and peace-keepers in the world, to really want to bring Peace on earth. On the contrary they have very obvious agendas of keeping the pot boiling so as never to let the WAR industry go bankrupt. It is bad economics as it causes huge unemployment at home!
While that policy is being implemented, it is self-evident truth that the Palestinians are being slowly but surely annihilated. The recent UN resolution against Israel is evidence of that. The US very kindly did not cast its veto to block it, but as a cowardly gesture abstained from voting for the resolution supported by rest of the world! How strange it is that when others say similar things, it is fair criticism but when a Muslim points it out, it is anti-Semitism and then inevitably other skeletons fall out of the closet.
----
A regular contributor to New Age Islam, Rashid Samnakay is a (Retd.) Engineer
- See more at: http://newageislam.com/islamic-ideology/rashid-samnakay,-new-age-islam/can-a-muslim-ever-be-anti-semitic?/d/109879#sthash.I19lV1yv.dpuf

Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh to Be Relocated to Remote Island



By Maher Sattar
January 31, 2017
Bangladesh’s government is moving forward with a plan to relocate Rohingya refugees staying in camps near the country’s largest tourist resort towns to a remote island that is underwater for much of the year.
A cabinet order on Thursday directed officials to have the refugees transferred to Thengar Char, an island in the Bay of Bengal that is lashed by high tides year round and submerged during the monsoon season. The suggestion that they be moved to the largely uninhabitable marshland several hours by boat from the mainland drew criticism from around the world.
The relocation plan was last proposed in 2015, but the government quietly suspended it after criticism from international aid groups and rights activists. Its reinstatement follows the arrival of about 65,000 Rohingya from Myanmar in October and November, after a crackdown by Myanmar’s army and attacks on security forces by Islamic insurgents.
The United Nations has called the Rohingya; a Muslim ethnic group denied citizenship in Myanmar, the world’s most persecuted minority. John McKissick, head of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in the Bangladeshi city of Cox’s Bazar, near the Burmese border, said in November that Myanmar’s government was trying to achieve an “ultimate goal of ethnic cleansing of the Muslim minority.”
Since 1992, about 32,000 registered Rohingya have been living in two United Nations camps near Cox’s Bazar, but estimates of unregistered refugees range from 200,000 to 500,000. Many of them live in two sprawling makeshift shelters close to the official camps, while others are scattered across southeast Bangladesh.
Talk of forced relocation worries refugees who have lived in the Cox’s Bazar area for more than two decades.
“We have been here for a long time,” one of them, Shafiul Mostafa, said in a telephone interview on Tuesday from one of the camps. “We have gotten to know our neighbours, and we can speak the local dialect, which is similar to our language. If we are taken to a new place, it will be very difficult for us. We won’t be able to communicate with anyone.”
The United Nations refugee agency, which runs the camps, criticized the relocation proposal in 2015, calling it “complex and controversial” and saying that departures would have to take place with the migrants’ consent.
Now, the return of the plan has taken aid groups by surprise.
“U.N.H.C.R. is concerned about this news and seeking details from the authorities,” Shinji Kubo, a representative of the United Nations refugee agency in Bangladesh, said by email. “Any move must be carried out through a consultative and voluntary process, and the feasibility of the proposed site must be assessed.”
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International say a recent crackdown in Myanmar indiscriminately targeted the Rohingya, citing satellite imagery showing 1,500 Rohingya homes burned down and widespread reports of mass killings and rapes.
The cabinet in Bangladesh has directed officials to take steps to stop further “illegal entry of Myanmar nationals” and to prevent existing refugees from “mixing in with local populations.” It also ordered officials to keep all illegal immigrants from Myanmar in designated areas, and to arrest them or push them back into those areas if they tried to leave.
The order, which was posted on the cabinet’s website, said the arrival of Rohingya in recent months had raised tensions, created “physical risks” for local people, and caused social and economic problems in Cox’s Bazar.
Critics of the relocation say the order has more to do with a desire to develop Cox’s Bazar, home to what the government promotes as the longest beach in the world, into a booming tourism destination to rival others in Asia.
“Right now, people here are only building hotels and guesthouses,” said Hayat Khan, an executive at the Ocean Paradise Hotel in Cox’s Bazar.
“You go to the beach for half an hour, and then there’s nothing more to do. You need cable cars, and theme parks like the Window of the World in Shenzhen,” he added, referring to a city in southern China. “For that, you will need a lot of investment, and a lot of land.”
Rohingya refugees and their leaders say that they were not consulted about the plan.
“If the government wants something, we will have to obey them,” said Mr. Mostafa, the refugee. “At the end of the day, what we want or don’t want is not going to matter to anyone.”
Source: nytimes.com/2017/01/31/world/asia/rohingya-refugees-bangladesh.html?emc=edit_tnt_20170131&nlid=71783194&tntemail0=y&_r=0
- See more at: http://newageislam.com/islam-and-politics/maher-sattar/rohingya-refugees-in-bangladesh-to-be-relocated-to-remote-island/d/109907#sthash.GopjMFqT.dpuf

Diplomats Decry Muslim Ban


New York Times Editorial
January 30, 2017
More than 100 State Department employees have indicated they will sign a memorandum in coming days registering their opposition to President Trump’s travel ban through the department’s “dissent cable” system, an official mechanism created to voice dissent to policies.
A draft of the memo, written by a midlevel officer in the State Department’s consular bureau, predicted that the ban on citizens of seven nations, and the indefinite suspension of the resettlement of Syrian refugees, would be “counterproductive” to its stated goal of enhancing national security.
“This ban stands in opposition to the core American and constitutional values that we, as federal employees, took an oath to uphold,” the memo said, warning that the ban has the potential to increase anti-American sentiment among Muslims worldwide. The acting attorney general, Sally Yates, an Obama administration holdover, backed that view in a letter Monday to Justice Department lawyers, instructing them not to defend the order in court. Hours later, Mr. Trump fired Ms. Yates.
“We have a special obligation,” the draft memo said, “to maintain an immigration system that is as free as possible from discrimination, that does not have implied or actual religious tests, and that views individuals as individuals, not as part of stereotyped groups.”
The memo warned that the ban would also alienate key allies in the Middle East, which could result in the United States losing access to “the intelligence and resources need[ed] to fight the root causes of terror abroad, before an attack occurs within our borders.” The writer noted that there were alternative ways to make traveller screening more comprehensive by strengthening existing protocols and information-sharing systems.
The administration would be reckless to dismiss this warning from public servants who have spent their careers safeguarding American interests abroad. Their concerns are shared by lawmakers from both parties, several European leaders and top United Nations officials.
In just a few days, the misguided order has disrupted the lives of hundreds of refugees, scholars and professionals, while providing jihadist groups with a propaganda bonanza. The members of the administration who set this initiative in motion may have thought it would make the country safer. By now, it has to have become apparent even to them that it is having the opposite effect.
Source: nytimes.com/2017/01/30/opinion/diplomats-decry-muslim-ban.html?emc=eta1&_r=0
----
President Bannon?
January 30, 2017
Plenty of presidents have had prominent political advisers, and some of those advisers have been suspected of quietly setting policy behind the scenes (recall Karl Rove or, if your memory stretches back far enough, Dick Morris). But we’ve never witnessed a political aide move as brazenly to consolidate power as Stephen Bannon — nor have we seen one do quite so much damage so quickly to his putative boss’s popular standing or pretences of competence.
Mr. Bannon supercharged Breitbart News as a platform for inciting the alt-right, did the same with the Trump campaign and is now repeating the act with the Trump White House itself. That was perhaps to be expected, though the speed with which President Trump has moved to alienate Mexicans (by declaring they would pay for a border wall), Jews (by disregarding their unique experience of the Holocaust) and Muslims (the ban) has been impressive. Mr. Trump never showed much inclination to reach beyond the minority base of voters that delivered his Electoral College victory, and Mr. Bannon, whose fingerprints were on each of those initiatives, is helping make sure he doesn’t.
But a new executive order, politicizing the process for national security decisions, suggests Mr. Bannon is positioning himself not merely as a Svengali but as the de facto president.
In that new order, issued on Saturday, Mr. Trump took the unprecedented step of naming Mr. Bannon to the National Security Council, along with the secretaries of state and defense and certain other top officials. President George W. Bush’s last chief of staff, Joshua Bolten, was so concerned about separating politics from national security that he barred Mr. Rove, Mr. Bush’s political adviser, from N.S.C. meetings. To the annoyance of experienced foreign policy aides, David Axelrod, President Barack Obama’s political adviser, sat in on some N.S.C. meetings, but he was not a permanent member of the council.
More telling still, Mr. Trump appointed Mr. Bannon to the N.S.C. “principals’ committee,” which includes most of those same top officials and meets far more frequently. At the same time, President Trump downgraded two senior national security officials — the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a role now held by Gen. Joseph Dunford Jr., and the director of national intelligence, the job that Dan Coats, a former member of the Senate Intelligence Committee and former ambassador to Germany, has been nominated to fill.
All this may seem like boring bureaucratic chart-making, but who sits at the National Security Council table when the administration debates issues of war and peace can make a real difference in decisions. In giving Mr. Bannon an official role in national security policy making, Mr. Trump has not simply broken with tradition but has embraced the risk of politicizing national security, or giving the impression of doing so.
Mr. Trump’s order says that the chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the director of national intelligence will attend the principals’ committee meetings only “where issues pertaining to their responsibilities and expertise are to be discussed.” Could there be any national security discussions when input from the intelligence agencies and the military will not be required? People in those jobs are often the ones to tell presidents hard truths, even when they are unwelcome.
As his first week in office amply demonstrated, Mr. Trump has no grounding in national security decision making, no sophistication in governance and little apparent grasp of what it takes to lead a great diverse nation. He needs to hear from experienced officials, like General Dunford. But Mr. Bannon has positioned himself, along with Mr. Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, as the president’s most trusted aide, shutting out other voices that might offer alternative views. He is now reportedly eclipsing the national security adviser, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.
While Mr. Trump long ago embraced Mr. Bannon’s politics, he would be wise to reconsider allowing him to run his White House, particularly after the fiasco over the weekend of the risible Muslim ban. Mr. Bannon helped push that order through without consulting Mr. Trump’s own experts at the Department of Homeland Security or even seeking deliberation by the N.S.C. itself. The administration’s subsequent modifications, the courtroom reversals and the international furor have made the president look not bold and decisive but simply incompetent.
As a candidate, Mr. Trump was immensely gratified by the applause at his rallies for Mr. Bannon’s jingoism. Yet now casually weaponized in executive orders, those same ideas are alienating American allies and damaging the presidency.
Presidents are entitled to pick their advisers. But Mr. Trump’s first spasms of policy making have supplied ample evidence that he needs advisers who can think strategically and weigh second- and third-order consequences beyond the immediate domestic political effects. Imagine tomorrow if Mr. Trump is faced with a crisis involving China in the South China Sea or Russia in Ukraine. Will he look to his chief political provocateur, Mr. Bannon, with his penchant for blowing things up, or will he turn at last for counsel to the few more thoughtful experienced hands in his administration, like Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and General Dunford?
Source: nytimes.com/2017/01/30/opinion/president-bannon.html?emc=eta1
- See more at: http://newageislam.com/islam-and-the-west/new-york-times-editorial/diplomats-decry-muslim-ban/d/109908#sthash.iLobcb13.dpuf

To Defeat ISIS, Arm the Syrian Kurds



By Antony J. Blinken
January 31, 2017
When President Trump presides over his first meeting of the National Security Council, possibly this week, he is likely to confront a decision whose urgency is matched only by its complexity: whether to arm Syrian Kurdish fighters poised to liberate the Islamic State’s Syrian stronghold in Raqqa.
Taking back Raqqa, along with Mosul in Iraq — where Iraqi forces backed by the United States-led coalition have freed about half of the city — will effectively eliminate the Islamic State’s self-declared caliphate. The consequences for the Islamic State will be devastating. It will no longer control significant territory within which to train and harbour foreign fighters or exploit resources. It will lose the foundation of its most compelling narrative: the construction of an actual state.
As the noose around the Islamic State tightens, it has tried to adapt by plotting, inspiring or taking responsibility for indiscriminate attacks around the world: a nightclub in Orlando, Fla., a promenade in Nice, France, a cafe in Dhaka, Bangladesh, a square in Istanbul. Recruits are being told to stay home and attack there. Foreign fighters are being pushed out of Iraq and Syria, back to where they came from. The Islamic State directs its external operations from Raqqa. Hence, the urgency of Raqqa’s liberation.
The only fighters capable of seizing Raqqa belong to our most effective partner on the ground — the Syrian Democratic Forces, a mixture of Arabs and Kurds dominated by the People’s Protection Units, a Kurdish militia. The S.D.F. can succeed only if it is armed to overcome the Islamic State’s ferocious urban resistance of snipers, suicide bombers and improvised explosive devices.
In the last days of the Obama administration, the Pentagon said it would immediately seek permission from President Trump to do just that. It rightly wants to take advantage of the S.D.F.’s momentum in isolating Raqqa.
It is also determined to get the several hundred Special Operations forces President Barack Obama ordered into Syria the most effective partners possible.
So what’s the rub? Turkey — a NATO ally and key player in Syria — passionately opposes any American support to the Syrian Kurds, especially the protection units. It is angered by the militia’s links to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, known as the P.K.K., a terrorist group that has plagued Turkey for decades.
The end of a cease-fire between the Turkish government and the P.K.K. has produced repeated attacks by the Kurdish group and a scorched-earth campaign by the government. Ankara argues that any aid the United States gives the People’s Protection Units militia will end up in the hands of the P.K.K. and be used to murder Turkish civilians.
As deputy secretary of state, I spent hours with my Turkish counterparts trying to find a modus Vivendi for continuing American support to the Syrian Democratic Forces. At every juncture — from the liberation of Manbij in north-eastern Syria to the isolation of Raqqa — they protested angrily and threatened repercussions, including denying the international coalition access to Incirlik air base and slowing counterterrorism cooperation. Anti-American rhetoric surged in the Turkish media. Each time, it took President Obama’s direct engagement with Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to smooth the way just enough to keep going.
If President Trump approves the Pentagon’s recommendation to arm the S.D.F., it will fall to him to keep Mr. Erdogan onboard — a first, highly charged test of his diplomatic skills. There is an art to this deal.
First, Mr. Trump should make clear that he has no more urgent priority than defeating the Islamic State — and that Raqqa cannot wait. Pushing the pause button in the illusory search for an alternative liberation force more amenable to Turkey would delay any move on Raqqa for months.
Second, any support we provide the Syrian Democratic Forces should be mission-specific — just enough to do the job in Raqqa, not enough to risk spill over to the P.K.K. United States Special Operations forces will have to ensure the S.D.F. is using resources only for its intended purpose.
We should insist that it commit to not use any weapons against Turkey, to cede liberated Raqqa to local forces, to respect Syria’s territorial integrity and to dissociate itself from the P.K.K.
Third, keeping the S.D.F. focused on Raqqa keeps it away from the Turkish-Syrian border — and any effort by Syrian Kurds to join the area they control in a contiguous Kurdish region or state. Turkish troops entered Syria to prevent the emergence of such a state. President Trump should clearly reiterate our own opposition to such a development.
Fourth, Turkey wants to take back the Islamic State-controlled town of Al Bab before the Syrian Kurds do. President Trump should back strong American air support for the Turkish operation there and reiterate our determination to help Turkey consolidate a broader buffer zone in northern Syria.
Fifth, Mr. Trump should double down on support for Turkey’s fight against the P.K.K., including helping find the group’s leadership holed up in Iraq’s Qandil Mountains.
Finally, the president must rethink last week’s executive order on immigration. At the very moment the Islamic State is on its heels, the order risks becoming a recruitment bonanza for jihadists while shutting America’s doors to the very people taking the fight to the Islamic State on the ground.
-----
Antony J. Blinken, a former deputy secretary of state in the Obama administration, is a contributing opinion writer.
Source: nytimes.com/2017/01/31/opinion/to-defeat-isis-arm-the-syrian-kurds.html?_r=0
- See more at: http://newageislam.com/islam-and-the-west/antony-j-blinken/to-defeat-isis,-arm-the-syrian-kurds/d/109909#sthash.KNo8q200.dpuf

Islam amid France’s Elections



By Nahla Chahal
31 January 2017
It is believed one of the reasons Allan Juppé was unable to win the nomination of France’s political right in the upcoming May election, was his yielding position on the issue of Islam in France, or at least that’s what his competitors tried to convey to the public. Issues that range from the Hijab to the Niqab, from food at school cafeterias to building mosques always ended with open discussions about homeland terrorism, broadcasted by the entire world.
At the time, critics named Alan ‘Ali’. Indeed, in French, the two names are very similar at least vocally; posters of Allan or Ali Juppé filled the streets. Manuel Valls, the former prime minister and a Socialist Party nominee hopeful for the presidential elections restored this fission in an effort to hurt his rival Benoit Hamon. The latter was chosen, by a landslide, by the Socialists for the Elysee fight, causing a surprise that reminded some of the victory of Francois Fillon in winning the nomination of the political right.
The Internal division on the issue of Islam, remains less severe in right-wing circles, with some very religious, while others are deeply conservative and close to the church. But there is a broader spectrum of views within the Socialist Party, which claims to have a bigger task, defending modernity and secularity as French attributes and while protecting a progressive “Republic”.
Benoit Hamon’s name was also changed by critics who gave it a Muslim leaning; his opponents renamed him Bilel. Although it doesn’t completely sound the same, it is the end game that matters. During the second round in the epic debate against Valls - where only one candidate could come out victorious - Hamon responded saying he thought the name Bilel was beautiful.
‘A Leftist Islamist’
As a matter of fact, a minister of the current government who chose to remain anonymous leaked to the newspaper Liberation that Hamon “is the candidate of the Muslim Brotherhood”, while Malek Boutih (a deputy and leader of the Socialist Party of Algerian and Muslim origin, who was commissioned to be the chairman of an Organization against racism) publically called him “a leftist Islamist”.
Hamon responded quietly that as a deputy for the region of Yvelines, known to have a strong Muslim population, with a city that is described as dangerous, where the children of Immigrants who have become French, rag (including the star Jamel Debbouze and a number of other successful figures) asserted that these titles do not worry him.
He disclosed that he was not ashamed to receive veiled mothers of pupils who had come to protest the decision of the Government of Valls, which had banned them from accompanying their children on school trips. Nor, he said, was he ashamed that his spokesman was a member of the “rally against Islamophobia in France”. Benoit Hamon dismantled all the scandals around him, which his rivals, especially those closes to the circle of the former prime minister, try to exploit and highlight.
During a television debate Manuel Valls attacked Benoit Hamon’s “lenient” and “ambiguous” stance toward radical Islam. Hamon responded by stressing his views of co-existing and rebuffing the general political notion on the issue, saying he defended secularism but also the right of individuals to freely express their beliefs.
He aptly explained the “Laicite” law that “solely permits believers and nonbelievers to be the way they want and ensure the neutrality of the public force and the state”. Hamon’s views totally contradict that of his competitor who urges for a strict interpretation of “Laicite” and calling in his campaign to link the law with the constitution, in a gambit move for its amendment.
Laicite Law
Valls believes the 1950 law which palpably defines “Laicite” – the French concept of secularism - and its scope. He openly avowed adopting the views of the French philosopher Elizabeth Badinter and the writer Caroline Frouster, who spearhead an anti-Islam campaign under the slogan of fighting terrorism, extremism and religious ideology and the emancipation of women, implying that Muslims are incapable of integration with the French values. On the other hand, they have been accused by Hamon “they foresee the good Muslim as the Muslim who is not Muslim”.
He suggested creating an investigative discrimination body, similar to the fraud committee, to probe discrimination in government institutes and enforcing penalties. Valls’ stance, which involves going beyond the “laicite” to enact a law prohibit women covering (wearing Hijabs) in universities, acknowledging at the same legal hindrance to executing his vision, he quipped saying “we will find a way to overcome obstacles. Previously the former French Minister defended a ban on Burkinis in more than dozen coastal towns.
During the heated debate, Hamon, unlike his opponent, opted for a fluid approach, he accused Valls of breaching laws to fulfil his personal beliefs. He reminded him of the reply of 30 University Deans in response to his plan to ban Hijab in university “Hijab is never a concern and causes no disruption to public order”.
Since the tenure of Sarkozy, Islam, as other grave crisis, has been the main focus of political debates in France. It has become the “scapegoat” of all the Socialists problems to duck from internal crisis promoted their debates, concepts, and principles establishing the supremacy of the fascist-right represented by the National Front and its candidate, Marine Le Pen who lead the French presidential race in the first round of voting.
-----
Nahla Chahal is a writer, journalist, researcher and activist. She is a columnist at London-based Al Hayat newspaper and is president of the Arab Women Researchers Association.
Source: english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2017/01/31/Islam-amid-France-s-elections.html
- See more at: http://newageislam.com/islam-and-the-west/nahla-chahal/islam-amid-france%E2%80%99s-elections/d/109910#sthash.g42Sfadf.dpuf

The Forgotten Stories of Muslims Who Saved Jewish People during the Holocaust


By Melissa Chan
Jan 27, 2017









(Top row, left to right) Behic Erkin, King Zog I of Albania, Noor Inayat Khan; (Bottom row, left to right) Mohamed Helmy, Rifat Abdyl Hoxha, Ahmed Pasha Bey  I Am Your Protector
----
Even in the darkest times, there are heroes—though sometimes they may be the people we least expect.
That’s the message a global non-profit group hopes to spread Friday on Holocaust Remembrance Day, when it displays a small exhibit in a New York synagogue highlighting the little-known stories of Muslims who risked their lives to rescue Jewish people from persecution during World War II. Though the two religious groups are often presented in opposition, this exhibit is a reminder that they have also shared an important history of cooperation and mutual assistance.
The tales include those of Khaled Abdul Wahab, who sheltered about two dozen Jews in Tunisia, and Abdol Hossein Sardari, an Iranian diplomat who is credited with helping thousands of Jews escape Nazi soldiers by issuing them passports.
The group also recognizes the Pilkus, a Muslim family in Albania who harboured young Johanna Neumann and her mother in their home during the German occupation and convinced others that the two were family members visiting from Germany. “They put their lives on the line to save us," Neumann, now 86, told TIME on Friday. "If it had come out that we were Jews, the whole family would have been killed."
“What these people did, many European nations didn’t do," she added. "They all stuck together and were determined to save Jews."
The collection of 15 stories shows how people organically came to protect one another, even in extreme environments of war and conflict, organizers said. “Those stories are very powerful together because they show a different side to humanity. It shows that we can have hope even at a time like the Holocaust,” said Mehnaz Afridi, a Manhattan College professor who specializes in Islam and the Holocaust.
Though the narratives are being exhibited on a day observed by remembering the past, they are also vital to remember in today's world, "given the rise of hatred,” said Dani Laurence Andrea Varadi, co-director of I Am Your Protector, the organization behind the exhibit.
The New York City-based group encourages societies and people to stand up to injustices, and Varadi points as an example to the climate faced by many Muslims around the world and in the U.S. as an example of what can happen when a group of people are seen as a monolith rather than as individuals. Hate crimes against Muslims in the U.S. soared 67% in 2015 from 154 in 2014 to 257, the latest figures from the FBI show. During his campaign, President Donald Trump pledged to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the country. Just this week, Trump’s administration announced new immigration plans, and the White House is expected to order that the U.S. temporarily stop issuing visas to people from several majority-Muslim countries.
“It makes people think it’s legitimate to hate,” Varadi said. “It is natural and normal to be scared and to think that we have to resist or fight, but we can also have a mechanism where we can catch ourselves and say, ‘OK, there are some people who might be problematic, and we can look at them one on one.’”
She added that the historic tales of courage show the impact that can be made when people protect targets of hate in climates of rising fear, suspicion and hatred. Varadi hoped the stories inspire others to follow suit.
“We can speak up, stand up for the other when we witness something, raise our voices in a peaceful, nonviolent way,” she said. “Whenever people think, ‘There’s nothing I can do. I cannot make a difference,’ this is the most dangerous thing to think because it is not true.”
The exhibit debuted in the headquarters of United Nations in Geneva a few weeks ago. I Am Your Protector will revive the display for a one-day commemoration event Friday at New York City's Temple Emanu-El. However, organizers hope the stories have a lasting effect.“I think history shows that people stand up for each other—and those were the ones who created change. And if there’s enough people who do that, then the whole reality changes,” Varadi said. “When communities come together with that mindset, whether it’s small or big, it becomes a huge force that can basically change the course of history.”
Source: time.com/4651298/holocaust-memorial-day-muslims-jews/
- See more at: http://newageislam.com/islam-and-the-west/melissa-chan/the-forgotten-stories-of-muslims-who-saved-jewish-people-during-the-holocaust/d/109911#sthash.HxhLROsh.dpuf

Child, Bride, Mother: Nigeria



By Stephanie Sinclair
January 27, 2017
After conquering Bama, the second-largest town in Nigeria’s Borno state, a small group of fighters from the militant Islamist group Boko Haram forced their way into the thatched-roof home of Hawa’s family, demanding the 15-year-old girl as a bride.
“My parents refused to give me away in marriage,” Hawa told me in November. “So they killed them in front of me.”
They then turned to her grandfather. “What do you have to say?” the fighters asked. He reluctantly acquiesced, and they handed him a few thousand Nigerian naira as a bride price, roughly $10. The men carried Hawa away.
After invading Bama, the Boko Haram insurgents came to my house, one of them saw me and said, “I want to marry you.” I said I will not marry you. My parents will not give me to you. Then he said, “O.K. that is easy. Let me kill them, so that you will now be the one to decide.” We got married in the Sambisa forest. Three months later, he came to tell me that he wanted to go attack a community. My husband was killed in that attack. I was pregnant by that point.
Along with about 20 other girls, many of them friends and classmates, Hawa was taken to one of the militants’ camps deep within the 200-square-mile Sambisa Forest.
Since beginning its insurgency against the Nigerian government in 2009, Boko Haram has unleashed bombings, assassinations and abductions from its bases in the forest in an effort to topple the government and create an Islamic state.
Kidnappings like Hawa’s were not uncommon in northern Nigeria, yet it was only when the group abducted 276 schoolgirls from their dormitory in the town of Chibok in 2014 that the world took notice. With the mantra “Bring Back Our Girls,” the issue exploded on social media. But with little news from the remote region, the public’s interest waned.
Nearly three years later it’s now becoming apparent that the Chibok abductions were just one instance of a profoundly disturbing tactic: child marriage as a weapon of war.
The situation was unbearable. They killed people in our presence so we would be afraid. Unfortunately, we had to leave some of our friends behind. We’d hoped we would meet soldiers and hoped they would not shoot us when they saw us. We lost faith we would be rescued. We foraged for food for the seven days it took us to get to Maiduguri.
According to the International Crisis Group, the relative ease with which Boko Haram carried out the Chibok abductions emboldened the group. With increasing frequency, both Christian and, more recently, Muslim women and girls have been kidnapped, dismantling communities that oppose the group’s brutal tactics. To attract male recruits and motivate combatants, Boko Haram awards these “wives” to fighters. As these girls reach puberty, forced marriages often turn them into unwilling mothers; their children are destined to become the next generation of fighters, raised with their fathers’ twisted ideology.
This trade in child brides was common even before the conflict. According to Girls Not Brides, a global partnership of civil society organizations, across Nigeria 43 percent of girls is married before their 18th birthday. In northern Nigeria, the rate is as high as 76 percent. Girls are most commonly forced into marriage for economic reasons: one fewer mouth to feed for their birth families and sources of labour, sex and childbearing for the groom’s family. Now, with the region devastated by violence, desperate parents increasingly see early marriage as a way to protect their daughters as fighting closes schools, and families grow more impoverished.
I never considered him my husband. If I liked him, I wouldn’t have run away. I felt like a living ghost. I was not afraid to escape, being alive in that camp was already the worst thing that could happen to me.
DADA, 14
On a hot afternoon, in a cramped office in Maiduguri, the capital of Borno State, I discussed the status of the Chibok girls, many reportedly married off to fighters, with Engr Satomi Ahmad, the executive chairman of Borno’s State Emergency Management Agency.
“Being the chairman of this agency, the Chibok girls, for me, don’t even represent 0.1 percent, not even 0.1 percent, of the entire abduction of girls,” Mr. Ahmad said.
Reports provided to the Nigerian government estimate that up to 9,000 women and girls have been abducted since the start of Boko Haram’s insurgency. Mr. Ahmad believes that at least 13,000 more are unaccounted for, and likely even more from areas that are too dangerous to assess.
Last November I spoke with about 30 girls who had been abducted and forced to wed some of the world’s most violent men. They spoke of being caged for months, of friends set on fire, of being forced into marriage and sexually assaulted by men who “smelled of blood.”
My friend died while giving birth. When I saw her die, I decided to escape. When I got home, I discovered I was carrying a dead child. I would love to have been able to deliver and take care of the child.
BALKISU, 16
They abducted all of the girls in the village. They put us in a big house and we were married off after two weeks. After my first attempt was to run, they found me and threatened to kill my mother, who was hiding me. They contemplated killing me or beating me but finally decided on flogging me. I was pregnant at the time.
GOGOGI, 15
They described the risks they had taken to free themselves: racing through gun and mortar battles, sometimes pregnant or carrying a child, crossing rivers, walking for days without food or water, and the suspicion they were met with even after reaching safety.
Hawa didn’t know how long she’d spent in Boko Haram’s camp in the bush, though it was enough time to give birth to a baby boy, whom she named Mubarak. The child was nearly 6 months old when Hawa, now 17, escaped from her captors. But the journey home provided new tragedies: During the long walk to Maiduguri the baby died.
“I did not have enough milk to feed him,” she said.
Life outside of captivity has its own hardships for the girls called “Boko Haram wives,” with other Nigerians wary of their allegiances after so long in captivity.
The terrorists’ calculated use of children as suicide bombers — 75 percent of them girls — has added to the atmosphere of fear and distrust, with a devastating cascade of consequences for girls who do manage to escape.
I was abducted from my home in the evening. I was just hanging out in the neighbourhood when the insurgents came and forced me onto their bike. I’d been married just a week earlier. My baby was born in the bush. The insurgents nullified that marriage, and I was remarried to an insurgent. I returned to my husband when I escaped. He took me back.
AISHA A., 15
“Some pity us, others don’t want us near them,” Aisha I., 17, told me. After three and a half years in captivity, she arrived in Maiduguri homeless and three months pregnant.
Like the other former abductees I spoke with, Aisha and Hawa found themselves without education, money, family support or anyone to help them reintegrate peacefully and safely into society. In fact, I learned in interviewing representatives from multiple global aid organizations, few even knew the escaped girls were living in Maiduguri.
Why is no one trying to help Nigeria’s missing girls, either the ones held in the forest or those who have escaped? The effort and resources appear focused on the 276 Chibok girls. Boko Haram leaders claim the girls they’ve taken don’t want to come home. But government officials and escapees I spoke with say otherwise.
On my last morning in Maiduguri, I went to say goodbye to Aisha. Light streamed into the simple room in which she lived, and I watched as she made tea, organized her few belongings and nursed her son; each task a small step toward the life she hoped one day to rebuild.
“My dream for the future is for God to help me,” Aisha said. “And those who are still in the forest to escape.”
Source: nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/27/sunday-review/29Exposures-child-bride-interactive.html?ref=opinion
 - See more at: http://newageislam.com/islam,-women-and-feminism/stephanie-sinclair/child,-bride,-mother--nigeria/d/109912#sthash.INiOcohX.dpuf

Muslim Women in Austria Prohibited From Wearing Full-Face Veils




















The prohibition will apply to the Niqab and Burqa, the full-face or face-and-body coverings worn by some Muslim women AFP/ Getty Images
----
Independent Passports for Saudi Women Proposal Approved
Indonesian Women Seeking To Become IS Suicide Bombers: Study
Outrage at Confirmation of 5-Year Jail Sentence on Young London Mother in Iran
Iran: Marriage of girl children in south-eastern province
Indian Funded Girls to Join ISIS at Pakistan Man’s Behest: NIA
11 Books by Muslim Women That Show the Many Facets of Islam
How Muslim-American Women Are Fighting Back Against Trump's Immigration Ban
Compiled by New Age Islam News Bureau
-------

Muslim women in Austria prohibited from wearing full-face veils
Feb 1, 2017
Austria’s ruling centrist coalition has banned Muslim women from wearing full-face veils, such as burqas and niqabs, in public places like schools and courts.
On Tuesday, Austria became the latest European nation to take such measures and has announced that it is mulling the prohibition of headscarves for women working in public services.  
The measures are part of a reform package issued by the ruling Social Democratic party (SPÖ) and the center-right Austrian People’s party (ÖVP) aimed at preventing the collapse of their coalition which almost fell last week during crisis negotiations.
"We are committed to an open society, which also presupposes open communication. A full-face veil in public places stands in its way and will therefore be banned," said a statement released by the coalition.
A government spokesman noted that tourist destinations, such as ski resorts, and Vienna’s center are also included in the ban.    
Other new policies were also agreed upon such as the increasing of the country’s CCTV network and a mandatory “integration year” for refugees, during which they have to commit to learning German and work in charitable organizations.   
Similar restrictions have also been adopted in France and Belgium since 2011 while the Netherlands introduced a partial ban in 2015. Last year, Germany's Chancellor Merkel also called for banning the full-face veil.
Ibrahim Olgun, the director of Austria’s Islamic Faith Community, has slammed the ban, stressing that it would “pull the rug” from under attempts being made  to establish a good working relationship between the Austrian government and the country’s Muslim population.
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2017/02/01/508606/austria-burqa-niqab-ban
-------

Independent passports for Saudi women proposal approved
February 1, 2017
Manama: In what could lead to yet another breakthrough for Saudi women, the security committee of the Shura (Consultative) Council has approved a proposal to amend travel document rules and allow women to have their own passports.
The bill to amend three articles of the law was presented in May last year by five Shura members, Haya Al Muwaina, Lateefa Al Shaalan, Mohammad Al Khnaizi, Ata Al Sabti and Hamda Al Enezi.
The bill is yet to be debated and voted on by the council.
If the amendments are approved. Saudi women will be allowed to have their own passports without the need for the consent of their custodian, usually the husband, father or brother.
A father would register only his sons and daughters who are younger than 18 on his own passport, thus obliging women over 18 to apply for their own passports.
Husbands will no longer be able to register their wives on their own passports, making it mandatory for married women to have independent passports.
The amendments aim to consolidate the sense of citizenship among Saudi women by stressing there are no discriminations between men and women in their rights, the Shura members behind the proposal said, Saudi daily Okaz reported on Wednesday.
The changes would put an end to the exploitation of travel documents by the custodians of women, they added.
The proposal to consolidate the rights of Saudi women is the second to be endorsed by the security committee of the advisory council in one week.
On Sunday, the committee supported a bill to grant Saudi citizenship to children born to Saudi mothers and foreign fathers.
The bill was submitted to the Council last year and the security committee took it up in October for further studies.
The proposal calls for using a point system to grant the citizenship to those with Saudi mothers and non-Saudi fathers.
No date has been yet set for the debate at the Shura Council on the two bills, but Al Sabti, the head of the security committee, said they should be taken up within months.
The two bills, if approved by the Shura Council members, promise to make 2017 a momentous year for Saudi women.
The Shura Council is made up of 150 members, including 30 women. Most of the female members have doctorate degrees and held academic and research positions in universities. They also include the first Saudi woman diplomat, doctors and columnists.
http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/saudi-arabia/independent-passports-for-saudi-women-proposal-approved-1.1971394
-------

Indonesian women seeking to become IS suicide bombers: study
February 1, 2017
Indonesian women are taking on a more active role in violent extremism, with some seeking to become Islamic State (IS) group suicide bombers, a leading security think tank has warned.
The growing problem was highlighted after the arrest in December of two women with links to IS allegedly planning suicide attacks in the world’s most populous Muslim-majority country, according to a report from the Jakarta-based Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (IPAC).
Many from Indonesia — which has long struggled with Islamic militancy — have flocked to join IS in the Middle East, while radicals in the country have pledged allegiance to the group and attacks and plots have been linked to the militants.
But the increasing eagerness of Indonesian women to get involved in radicalism themselves, rather than merely support their extremist husbands, poses new risks, said the report from IPAC, which is headed by veteran Indonesian security analyst Sidney Jones. “Indonesian women in extremist organisations are now catching up with the lethal practices of their sisters in other parts of the world,” according to the study.
Increasing female involvement is linked to the appeal of IS but also to the growing sophistication of social media, which allows more women to read the extremists’ propaganda and take part in radical chat forums, said the report, which was released late Tuesday.
The most high-profile cases were the arrest of two former domestic workers, Dian Yulia Novi and Ika Puspitasari, who had allegedly volunteered to become suicide bombers in Jakarta and Bali. Leading Indonesian IS radical Bahrun Naim, who has been accused of directing a series of mostly botched terror plots in his homeland from Syria, had given them instructions and financial support, the report said.
Authorities detained Novi and her husband the night before a planned attack on the presidential palace in Jakarta and later picked up Puspitasari, who was part of the same network and had been planning to carry out a bombing on the holiday island of Bali, the report said. Other women have been arrested for offences including setting up a pro-IS charity, helping to make a bomb, and being fighters with a militant group on Sulawesi island.
IPAC called for the Indonesian government to try to find out more about female radical networks, including interviewing the many women who have been deported from Turkey after allegedly trying to cross into Syria to join IS. “The need to know more about Indonesian extremist women suddenly has become urgent,” it said. Indonesia’s national counter-terror agency declined to comment.
http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2017/02/01/indonesian-women-seeking-to-become-is-suicide-bombers-study/
-------

Outrage at Confirmation of 5-Year Jail Sentence on Young London Mother in Iran
23 January 2017
Confirmation in Iran of the five-year jail sentence on the young London mother Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe has been condemned as ‘outrageous’ by Struan Stevenson, a lecturer on Middle East politics and former British member of European Parliament. Speaking in Scotland Mr Stevenson said: “Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe was arrested at Imam Khomeini in Tehran last April as she attempted to return to the UK following a holiday with her two-year-old daughter Gabriella. She is a 38-year-old charity worker, from Hampstead, northwest London, married to Richard Ratcliffe. She has dual British/Iranian nationality, but because Iran does not recognise dual nationalities, those detained cannot receive consular assistance.
“She was sentenced to five years imprisonment by Iran’s revolutionary court on ‘secret charges’, apparently relating to an alleged attempt by her to organise the ‘soft-overthrow’ of the Iranian regime, whatever that is supposed to mean. Reports from the regime’s media suggest that this sentence has now been finalised by the Tehran prosecutor Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi.”
Stevenson continued: “Nazanin’s toddler, Gabriella, remains in Iran with members of her family after authorities seized her passport. In a recent phone conversation, she told her husband that Revolutionary Guards officials said she must choose between having her daughter, Gabriella, stay with her in Tehran's Evin prison for up to three days a week, or sign a document saying she does not want the "right to be with her young daughter", basically relinquishing custody of her own daughter. She told her husband that both options were clearly unacceptable. According to Amnesty International UK, Evin prison authorities imposed this cruel choice in an attempt to counter negative publicity caused by the 37-year-old being separated from her toddler. Nazanin’s husband Richard has branded her sentence as “a punishment without a crime” and said she was struggling with being separated from her daughter and suffering hair and weight loss as a result of her ordeal.”
Struan Stevenson continued: “Serial abuse of human rights has become a daily fact of life in this medieval, theocratic regime, under the supposedly ‘moderate’ presidency of the smiling Hassan Rouhani. More than 70 people have been hanged so far this year, many of them in public; at least 2700 have been executed since he took office three years ago and yet the West continues to seek ways of securing commercial contracts with this evil and oppressive regime. The Justice Minister appointed by Rouhani is Mostafa Pour Mohammadi, a man who has publicly admitted and gloried in his key role in the murder of 30,000 political opponents, mostly from the People’s Mojahedin's of Iran (PMOI or MEK) opposition group in 1988. It is unacceptable that the UK can simply sit back and wring its hands in dismay at this treatment of a UK citizen and her child.
“There must be immediate and public condemnation of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s sentence and demands for her urgent release. She was originally sentenced the day after Britain restored our UK embassy and ambassador in Iran, supposedly because we wished to resume normal relations. This sickening verdict by the Iranian regime proves that there can never be a normal, civilized relationship and Britain should now threaten to sever diplomatic ties with the country unless Mrs Zaghari-Ratcliffe is released.”
Note: Struan Stevenson was a Member of the European Parliament representing Scotland (1999-2014). He was President of the Parliament’s Delegation for Relations with Iraq (2009- 2014) and Chair of Friends of a Free Iran Intergroup (Caucus) from 2004-2014. He is now President of the European Iraqi Freedom Association (EIFA).
http://www.ncr-iran.org/en/news/human-rights/22011-outrage-at-confirmation-of-5-year-jail-sentence-on-young-london-mother-in-iran
-------

Iran: Marriage of girl children in south-eastern province
28 January 2017      
Sistan-o Baluchistan, lying in south-eastern Iran along the border with Pakistan, is one of the main provinces where a lot of child marriages take place.
"Unfortunately, the largest number of marriages takes place in the southern part of Sistan-o Baluchistan… These marriages are mostly done with young girls rather than boys," explained Saeed Seyed-ol Hosseini, a deputy to the Medical Regime Organization.
He added, "Girls often are between 12 and 13 years old in these types of marriages. They are mostly wed to old men who have multiple spouses… The main reason for this type of marriages is poverty. Families receive houses, cars, and cash in return for their daughter's marriage."
Seyed-ol Hosseini reiterated, "These young girls unfortunately undergo depression and other internal problems until the end of their lives, because their husbands turn 70 or 80 when they are not even 20." (The state-run ILNA news agency – January 27, 2017)
http://women.ncr-iran.org/iran-women-news/3615-iran-marriage-of-girl-children-in-southeastern-province
-------

Indian Funded Girls to Join ISIS at Pakistan Man’s Behest: NIA
January 31, 2017
Three girls from the Philippines and Tunisia, who were alleged to be ISIS sympathisers, were given money by a Dubai-based Indian supporter of the terror outfit on the instructions of a Pakistani national, the NIA has said. The agency has claimed that Maharashtra resident Mohammed Farhan Shaikh, who was arrested in 2016 along with two others after being deported from the UAE for alleged ISIS links, had funded these girls, after money was given to him in Dubai by one Khalid, who is alleged to be from Pakistan.
NIA has alleged that Shaikh, who was in Dubai in 2015, had transferred 3894.24 United Arab Emirates Dirham (UAED) to a Tunisian girl, Sarra Ghribi, who wanted to join ISIS, in seven instalments through the global payment service, Western Union, between February 5, 2015 and April 24 that year. National Investigation Agency (NIA) has claimed before a court here that Shaikh had transferred 1257.63 UAED and 846.75 UAED to Jannah Qassim and Johaira L Macasimpang, residents of Philippines, on June 24, 2015.
In his disclosure statement recorded by NIA which has been annexed in the charge sheet, Shaikh has claimed that in January 2015, he got in touch with Ghribi through Facebook. She was a “supporter and sympathiser” of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). “She (Ghribi) was interested to join ISIS. She approached me and asked for money. Same thing I told to Khalid that there is a Tunisian girl who wants to go to Syria and she needs money. He told me to come to his showroom and over there, Khalid gave me 1300 Dirham and I paid that money to Sarra Ghribi.
“Later, Khalid gave me 5000 Dirham to give to Ghribi. On June 2, 2015, Khalid deposited 5000 Dirham in my bank account. I paid 5000 Dirham in total to Ghribi. I made all the money transaction through Western Union,” Shaikh has said.
http://indianexpress.com/article/india/indian-funded-girls-to-join-isis-at-pakistan-man-behest-nia-4501070/
-------

11 Books By Muslim Women That Show The Many Facets Of Islam
01-Feb-17
Let’s have some real talk for a second: the headlines are frightening right now. Between Donald Trump's temporary refugee ban, religious tests upon entering the United States, and a terrorist attack on a mosque in Quebec by a supporter of the current American president, things are dire (and there’s always the ominous promise of more to come). It can feel like there’s nothing to do but despair. But there’s one thing so many of us know: This isn’t what we stand for. This isn’t who we are. And this isn’t the legacy we will leave.
Quite simply, we refuse.
One of the most important things to remember in this difficult time is the importance of reading. Reading books about people who don’t look, think, or act like us broadens our horizons. It turns them from an “other,” condemned out of fear, to just another neighbor. We have a duty to stand with our Muslim neighbors, to resist any attempts to separate them from the rest of us. Like any other faith or culture, Islam isn’t a monolith; these books by Muslim women show the many different facets of Islam. For those of us who aren’t Muslim, it’s important to read and share these books.
This first novel in a lush mystery series features a Canadian governmental team — Esa Khattak and Rachel Getty — as they handle cases sensitive to minority communities. Khan has a Ph.D. in International Human Rights Law, and it shows with her deft maneuvering in this book, as the main characters confront a suspect with possible ties to the Srebrenica massacre, the genocide of over 8,000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys. The subject might be heavy, but the novel is gripping, and the third in the series is out this month.
https://www.bustle.com/p/11-books-by-muslim-women-that-show-the-many-facets-of-islam-34353
-------

How Muslim-American Women Are Fighting Back Against Trump's Immigration Ban
1/31/17
Women and girls stand to be particularly affected by President Donald Trump's executive order temporarily banning all refugees as well as all travelers from seven majority-Muslim countries, and indefinitely banning Syrian refugees. This shuts the door on female refugees from Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq and other countries where women's human rights are particularly vulnerable; the anti-Muslim nature of the ban also increases pressure on women wearing hijab in the U.S.
Syrian women face not only the physical insecurity of a deadly proxy war, but also the danger of ISIS and other religious extremist groups whose leaders seek to control women’s bodies and their movements. This new policy closes the door on those women seeking refuge. Even the Yazidis of Iraq, the Christian minority group that has suffered the loss of thousands of women and girls who have been captured by ISIS and held as sex slaves, have been “denied boarding on U.S.-bound flights despite visas,” reported NPR’s Jane Arraf on Twitter.
On Saturday and Sunday, thousands gathered at Dulles Airport in Virginia and in New York, Dallas, Chicago and elsewhere to protest the executive order. Meanwhile, Muslim-American women at Dulles—and their daughters—were at the forefront of a peaceful resistance movement.
“The executive order says that it doesn’t want to let in people who support honor killings, but then [Trump] won’t let in the women who are at risk of these honor killings,” said Mirriam Seddiq, an Afghan-American criminal defense lawyer who fielded questions from the press on behalf of the hundreds of lawyers assembled. Seddiq stood in front of dozens of advocates camped out on laptops, surrounded by pizza boxes and tangerines meant to last them through the night. Many of the lawyers held signs that said, “Know someone who has been detained? I can help.”
As a woman in hijab ushered her children through the narrow walkway at Dulles international arrivals, surrounded on both sides by hordes of Muslim-American families and lawyers, the crowd broke out singing, “This land is my land, this land is your land.” 
“What we’ve seen is that they are sending people to secondary detainment who are not just from the countries on the list, but from all Muslim countries and from Africa,” said Sara Dill, a 37 year-old Muslim-American from Chicago and a lawyer with the American Bar Association, her tired face lined by a tightly wrapped bright yellow headscarf. Dill said of the ban on Syrian refugees to the U.S.: “the women and children coming out of Syria… have a dictator committing war crimes, they are coming out of this trauma…They had all of this hope that they were finally going to have safety and freedom, and they are being sent back.”
"It's the same as always... they hide their bigotry and misogyny by saying it's only if they [Muslim women] aren't here yet,” said Seddiq, who recently started the American Muslim Women Political Action Committee and says it is more important than ever to have Muslim women in elected office. 
The Trump administration says that the executive order is not a ban on Muslims, but rather a measure to restore security to the U.S. In a statement on Sunday, President Trump said, “It’s working out very nicely and we’re going to have a very, very strict ban and we are going to have extreme vetting, which we should have had in this country for many years.” The executive order states that, “In order to protect Americans, the U.S. must ensure that those admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes towards it and its founding principles… those who engage in bigotry or hatred (including “honor” killings, other forms of violence against women, or the persecution of those who practice religions different from their own)…”
The number of refugees that the US accepts is already a tiny fraction of the global burden: The U.S. admitted just 12,587 Syrians in 2016, compared to the 3 million that Turkey is hosting. Those familiar with refugee vetting say that it is a lengthy and rigorous process, and no person accepted as a refugee in the U.S. has been implicated in a major terrorist attack since the Refugee Act of 1980 set up detailed procedures for acceptance.
Hanging over the rope-lines at Dulles, Cansu Colakoglu, a young Turkish woman and graduate of Harvard Law School, asked passengers and pilots which flights they came off and whether any people had been detained. “People with headscarves were pulled out after passing customs to have a second inspections,” she reported, pausing to high five with an Iranian-American woman walking out of customs. Muslim women who cover their hair are especially vulnerable to detainment, including those traveling with children. Virginia Congressman Don Beyer, an advocate for women’s issues in the House, arrived at Dulles on Sunday afternoon to advocate for detainees. “They aren’t talking,” he tweeted of Customs Border Control, while seeking the release of Sudanese green-card holder and Virginia resident Nahla Gadalla. After Beyer’s questioning, Gadalla was released, although Border Control did not allow lawyers access to Gadalla or other detainees, according to Representative Beyer’s office.
“Families are getting scared, headscarves are being pulled. The kids are scared,” said Zainub (who declined to give her last name), a U.S. citizen from Pakistan in a peacock-blue headscarf. A teacher at an Islamic preparatory school in Reston, Virginia, she decided to protest at the airport in solidarity. Her ten-year old daughter, who had never before attended a protest, started a call and response with a willing crowd, shouting, “Show me what democracy looks like; This is what democracy looks like!” while Zainub filmed proudly.
Another mother from the same school, Samira, said her ten-year old daughter recently chose to start wearing a headscarf, a decision laden with meaning since January 20. “They don’t understand why we wear it. They might think we are here to blow up the place,” Samira said ruefully.
http://europe.newsweek.com/donald-trump-muslim-women-immigration-airport-protests-550840?rm=eu
-------

- See more at: http://newageislam.com/islam,-women-and-feminism/new-age-islam-news-bureau/muslim-women-in-austria-prohibited-from-wearing-full-face-veils/d/109916#sthash.2mEfwWUB.dpuf