Friday, December 11, 2015

Man Spits At American Muslim Women; Tells Her To Get Off Bus

Man Spits At American Muslim Women; Tells Her To Get Off Bus












Photo: Image Credit: Sharareh Delara Drury Facebook

After terror attacks, Muslim women say headscarves have made them targets for harassment
Muslim-American women seek change from within
3 Women of Muslim Backgrounds Receive US Human Rights Prize
Laws must enforced to end violence against women
California shooting: IS ignored Tashfeen's contact attempts, say US sources
Suicide attack by foreigner woman leaves 4 dead in Nangarhar
Saudi Council Recommends Allowing Women To Obtain Passports Without Male Guardians
16 Gulf women to climb region’s highest peak in Oman
Faith in their fight: Women campaign to scrap Haji Ali Dargah ban
Awareness seminar on women status
First Saudi vote campaign for women enters final day
Campaign ends for first Saudi vote with women participation
Muslim women launch developmental organization
Inside a container, visitors hear story of an abused woman
Bahrain puts spotlight on women's status
Compiled by New Age Islam News Bureau
URL:
---------

Man spits at American Muslim women; tells her to get off bus
11 December 2015
After US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump called for a ban on Muslims entering the United States in response to the shooting rampage by two Muslims in San Bernardino, California, there have been a growing number of hate crime and harassment cases reported against the Muslim community in the US.
The growing tension in the Muslim community was aggravated by the mass shootings by the couple who ISIS claim were followers of the Islamist militant group. While President Barack Obama called on Americans not to discriminate against Muslims, a young American woman, who is half Iranian took to Facebook to share and encounter that she and many others in the Muslim community experience in America.
Sharareh Delara Druryw, was born in Boston, Massachusetts and has lived in the US her whole life. On Facebook, she says her father was a 9/11 survivor and her "ancestor Hugh Drury who "helped contribute to the building blocks of what would become the United States of America" is buried in the "oldest graveyard in Boston".
Recently, while Druryw was on a Chicago bus on her way back from work, she writes "A man screamed at me. Called me a sand ni**er. Told me I was the problem. That I need to get the f*** out of his country."
"I may have been wearing my scarf higher on my head than usual because it was cold out. I may have somehow looked suspicious listening to Spotify. I am half Iranian, so maybe it was my skin or my eyes," she says. Adding that she tried to calmly tell him to back off while he kept screaming at her. "Then this man spits at me. A man in a suit and tie. Like anyone else I'd see. He spits at me and looks at me with these regular eyes now filled with anger and tells me to get the f*** off the bus, do what I'm told, because this isn't my country. This isn't my place."
Druryw said that people only decided to help her after she screamed back at him, which got the attention of the bus driver who eventually kicked the man off the bus. After the incident, she wondered, "How many others out there got screamed at and told today this isn't their country, that they're worthless somehow, that they don't matter. How many?"
Druryw goes on to say," My mother's family (Iranian) came here to seek incredible opportunities and they found them. They've become doctors and entrepreneurs and athletes and writers and singers." Druryw concludes she is American."I'm here and I belong. I won't get off the bus."
You can read Sharareh Delara Drury's entire post here:
Today. On a crowded bus. On Michigan Avenue. On my way home from a great job in a city in a diverse country that I was...
http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report-man-spits-at-american-muslim-women-tells-her-to-get-off-bus-2154424
---------

After terror attacks, Muslim women say headscarves have made them targets for harassment
Dec 11, 2015
When Leilah Abdennabi showed up for a lunch date at a popular Austin, Texas, cafe this week, she was surprised to find her friend crying.
Through tears, her friend Sirat Al-Nahi, 20, explained that while Abdennabi was parking, an elderly white man in the cafe began harassing her, suggesting Abdennabi didn't know how to drive and "should go back to Saudi Arabia."
In disbelief, Al-Nahi asked the man to repeat what he had said. He did, this time adding, "Do you have a gun? You should just shoot me."
The restaurant staff seated the man and his companion as Al-Nahi started crying.
Al-Nahi, a senior at the University of Texas at Austin and a devout Muslim who -- like her friend -- wears a headscarf, hadn't expected to be confronted at a locally-owned restaurant in Texas' decidedly liberal capital, an eatery that serves a dish called Nabil's Mid-East Feast.
Abdennabi, 24, asked to speak to the manager, who said there was nothing she could do. When Abdennabi approached the man and asked him to repeat what he had said, he told her to go away.
She surveyed the restaurant.
"No one was doing or saying anything. I was like, 'Just so you guys know, we were told some very racist things at this restaurant and no one did anything because who cares about us?' And someone shouted 'Nobody'," Abdennabi told the Los Angeles Times.
In the wake of the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, Muslim women wearing headscarves have become visible targets for harassment, often by men.
The Washington-based nonprofit Council on American–Islamic Relations has documented dozens of Islamophobic incidents nationwide since last month, including many against women wearing headscarves.
In Cincinnati, a driver tried to run down a young Muslim woman. In New York City, a customer called a female pharmacist wearing a headscarf a terrorist and told her to "get out of his country." In San Diego, a man shoved a pregnant Muslim mother's stroller into her belly and a San Diego State student reported a man tugged at her headscarf while yelling at her in a parking lot.
"It's not unexpected at all. In fact, it's what my research shows -- that Muslim women will be targeted because they are more easily identifiable; they can't pass as non-Muslim," said Sahar Aziz, an associate professor at Texas A&M School of Law.
Aziz researched similar harassment after the terrorist attack last January on the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris. She found harassment ranged from assaults to microagressions, such as passing comments and stares. Now, she said, "I suspect what happened in Austin is the tip of the iceberg."
She said it's like women in Muslim countries being harassed for not wearing headscarves: "It disempowers women from making choices about how they practice their faith."
In reaction, some Muslim women in the United States have stopped wearing headscarves to avoid being targeted. Aziz said immigrants may be most likely to abandon the headscarf while those like Abdennabi and Al-Nahi, born in the United States, have deeply-rooted confidence in their rights and won't sacrifice their faith.
"It really is an individual choice based on a person's upbringing and beliefs, particularly in the U.S.," said Aziz, 20, who is Egyptian American and has worn a headscarf for four years.
"Many of these women are putting the headscarf on as a feminist statement, desexualizing themselves. This needs to not just be a Muslim issue, but an American women's rights issue."
Abdennabi, a 24-year-old teacher's assistant, is Palestinian American and has worn a headscarf, or hijab, since she was 18. Though she has heard some women talk recently about taking off their headscarves, she said she won't give in.
"I don't think we should shrink ourselves or hide ourselves. ... Unlike when I was growing up, we have Facebook and Twitter and we can share our stories," she said.
She and Al-Nahi posted on Facebook about the incident at the cafe, drawing scores of supportive comments, including some non-Muslim men offering to escort her for her own safety. The women also received calls and a public apology posted online by Mason Ayer, the CEO of the restaurant, Kerbey Lane.
"There should be no place for racist, ignorant behavior in our society, and it's incredibly upsetting that an incident like this occurred at all," Ayer wrote. In retrospect, he said staff should have asked the "hateful guest" to leave.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-1210-muslim-women-headscarves-harassment-20151211-story.html
---------

Muslim-American women seek change from within
Dec. 10, 2015
Several weeks ago I had the privilege of meeting Nadiah Mohajir, a Muslim-American woman who spoke after a Chicago screening of "Radical Grace," a documentary about Catholic sisters working for justice.
For over five years, Nadiah has provided health education programming to over 2,000 Muslim women and girls in the Chicagoland area and cities across the country. She and her colleague, Ayesha Akhtar, co-founded Heart Women and Girls, a non-profit volunteer sexual advocacy organization for Muslim women. They did this after hearing heart-rending stories from Muslim women who had attended a health and wellness day they coordinated in 2009.
A principal from an Islamic school told of a fifth grader who missed three weeks of classes because she had started her period, didn't know what it was, and was too scared to ask anyone, including her mother. Another young woman struggled with denial before being able to name her uncle's unwanted intimate advances as sexual abuse. A newly married woman was experiencing sexual tension with her husband as they were unable to consummate their marriage.
These and similar stories led Nadiah and Ayesah to the conclusion that too many women in their communities "did not have a safe space to obtain health information in a way that was mindful of their religious or cultural upbringing and values." They developed culturally sensitive trainings, workshops, and downloadable toolkits to help Muslim women "negotiate their American identities, while still appreciating and honoring their values."
Nadiah's work has not always been welcomed by the Muslim community. Educating Muslim women about their bodies can make people uncomfortable, and she has found it difficult to get mosques to permit her programs. This was particularly true after she spoke to the media last February about a woman who was sexually abused by a formerly revered Chicago imam, Mohammed Abdullah Saleem.
I was struck that Nadiah's work within Islam resonates strongly with that of many Catholic women who have also chosen to stay within a patriarchal tradition and work for change. So I asked Nadiah for an interview and she graciously accepted.
Christine Schenk: You made a conscious decision to continue to practice Islam and to work for change from within. Why?
Nadiah Mohajir: I never left Islam because of my exposure in my early college years to the type of critical thinking ... and the rich history of diversity and unconditional love Islam has for all communities, not just for the typical 'mainstream' Muslim -- and so I knew that it wasn't the faith that was problematic, but rather the superficial understanding of Islam that some communities have. A scholar, Dr. Umar Faruq Abd-allah, was integral in helping me explore this and the need to contribute to an 'American Islam.' Here is a great paper ["Islam and the Cultural Imperative"] written by Dr. Umar that explores this further.
I grew up in a mosque community, and some of my dearest and closest childhood friends come from that community. However, as I grew to understand life and its complexities around me, I realized that the kinds of experiences, critical thinking, and diversity I want my kids to understand and appreciate were hard to find at the traditional suburban mosque or Sunday school.  ... so we essentially started our own 'alternative' Islamic studies program for the kids on Friday evenings.
What makes attending mosque difficult?
Many mosques, unfortunately, do not have a friendly demeanor toward women, and there is a lot of religious policing that goes on at mosques that I don't find productive. (For example: Your pants are too tight, your shirt isn't long enough, your hair is showing through your scarf, etc.).
How do you practice your faith without attending a mosque?
Going to a mosque regularly is not obligatory for women. In other words, leaving the mosque, or not being affiliated with one specific mosque, is not equivalent to leaving Islam. So while I never left Islam, I do not regularly attend a mosque.  Islam is a very private and personal religion in addition to one of congregation. Women can easily perform their five daily prayers and worship from home. I do attend the Eid prayers (our two holidays), but because I also live very close to a university, I generally attend the prayers on campus and not at a mosque.
You spoke about recent scholarship about early women leaders in Islam. Can you give some examples?
... [T]he examples that stick out for me: the Prophet's [Mohammed] wife Aisha, may God be pleased with her, trained many of the greatest imams in the next generation after his death. She narrated hundreds and hundreds of hadith (prophetic traditions and sayings of the Prophet) and even led and army and issued legal opinions.
[Mohammed's first wife] Khadijah ran a caravan business in Mecca. A wealthy and successful trader, she was also a twice-widowed single mother, 15 years Mohammed's senior, and his boss.
Seventh-century jurist and scholar Ummal-Darda taught jurisprudence in the mosques of Damascus and Jerusalem; her students were men, women and even the caliph.
Fatimah al-Fihri founded the first university in the world, in Fes, Morocco called the Qarawiyyin.
Fourteenth-century scholar Fatimah al-Bataihiyyah taught both men and women in the Prophet's mosque in Madina, and people would travel to learn from her.
Are there examples of present-day oppression of woman in Islam (wearing the burka, female education, etc.) attributed to the Quran/Mohammed that simply aren't true?
Wearing the burka or hijab (scarf) isn't inherently oppressive. In fact, many women find it a way to express their commitment to modesty and their faith. Many women find it very empowering and liberating. Others do it simply because God asked them to.
It's important to note that wearing the scarf is not a measure of how religious one is. Modesty encompasses much more than external dress: Muslims -- both men and women -- are called to be modest with respect to their behavior, language, possessions, even their thoughts. A great article on this is here ["Removing hijab, finding myself"].
Using force to implement hijab or burka is an example of how patriarchy, misogyny, politics have motivated those in leadership positions to move forward their own agendas. Although the women during the Prophet's time dressed modestly (some did wear the entire burka and face veil), they were also extremely empowered women. ...
Other examples of oppressing women:
Women are not allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia
The Taliban do not allow girls to go to school
Many girls are subjected to forced marriages or honor killings.
All of these situations are falsely attributed to Islam. [Neither the] Prophet nor the Quran endorsed any of them. Women and girls are granted much independence and rights in Islam, including a right to an education, and free will when it comes to marriage.
Can you talk about the positive understanding of God that Islam brings to our world?
The most emphasized attribute of God in Islam is that of mercy. We begin everything (whether it's our prayers, eating food, driving, taking an exam, etc.) with the following: 'In the name of God, the all merciful, the mercy-giving.' God has many attributes, but above all, he is merciful and his mercy is endless. This is an excellent article ["Mercy: The Stamp of Creation"] that explains this all beautifully. Specifically from the paper:
... In Islam, the All-Merciful (ar-Rahman) and the Mercy-Giving (ar-Rahim) may be said to be the greatest names of God after Allah. Of all his names, they are most descriptive of his relation to the world and emphasize his will in salvation history and throughout eternity to benefit creation and ultimately bring about the triumph of supreme good over evil.
This week Pope Francis launched a yearlong a Jubilee of Mercy.
I wonder if focusing on what Christianity has in common with Islam could help ease sectarian tensions that arise from extremist understandings of a God who seeks neither vengeance nor sacrifice, but rather mercy and justice.
God abhors violence – both the ostensibly "Christian" murders at Planned Parenthood and the ostensibly "Islamist" killings (including Muslims) in San Bernardino.
Women like Nadiah bring God's healing love to women and girls and also enhance the beautiful diversity of our country. Women like Nadiah are perhaps our best defense against jihadist extremism.
Together, we must work with the All-Merciful Allah to "bring about the triumph of supreme good over evil."
[A Sister of St. Joseph, Sr. Christine Schenk served urban families for 18 years as a nurse midwife before co-founding FutureChurch, where she served for 23 years. She holds master's degrees in nursing and theology.]
http://ncronline.org/blogs/simply-spirit/muslim-american-women-seek-change-within
---------

3 Women of Muslim Backgrounds Receive US Human Rights Prize
Alberto Pimienta
December 10, 2015
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Irshad Manji and Rebiya Kadeer came together Thursday from different corners of the world.
One of them survived childhood abuse, violence and a forced marriage in Somalia. Another receives frequent death threats and was the victim of an attack by Muslim extremists in Indonesia. And the other spent seven years in jail in China.
On a single stage Thursday in Washington, D.C., they looked at each other repeatedly without exchanging a single word. The shared looks were an implicit reaffirmation of what bound them together: the fight for human rights.
Thursday, on International Human Rights Day, the three women were awarded the Lantos Human Rights Prize.
The award is named after U.S. Congressman Tom Lantos, the only Holocaust survivor ever elected to Congress. Lantos was a fierce advocate for human rights, and his legacy can be felt in the halls of Capitol Hill where the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission routinely serves as a forum that defends human rights around the globe.
Since 2009, the Lantos Foundation has awarded the annual prize. In previous years, it has gone to the Dalai Lama and the Chinese human rights activist Chen Guangcheng, among others.
This year, for the first time, three women of Muslim backgrounds received the award.
From janitor to Parliament
Ayaan Hirsi Ali was born in Somalia in 1969. As a girl, she endured female genital mutilation. According to the World Health Organization, more than 125 million females — usually under the age of 15 — have been subjected to the process.
Later, Hirsi Ali was forced by her father to marry a distant cousin. That was when she decided to flee to The Netherlands.
There, she went from being a janitor and a translator to a member of the Dutch Parliament. For years, she has dedicated her life to fighting for women's rights. No religion or culture justifies abuses against women, she says.
"The fact that my religion, the religion I grew up in — I am not a Muslim anymore but the religion I grew up in — is used as a tool to kill people, to rape women, to spread anti-Semitism, to throw gay people from tall buildings, it's embarrassing, it's disgusting, and I feel responsible to come out and say something about it and do something about it in the most peaceful ways," Hirsi Ali said.
But those peaceful means can spark violence in others.
Filmmaker Theo Van Gogh worked with Hirsi Ali on Submission, a film about the oppression of Muslim women. In 2004, Van Gogh was stabbed to death in broad daylight in the streets of Amsterdam. The perpetrator, who had terrorist ties, left a note pinned on Van Gogh's chest.
It was a death threat against Hirsi Ali.
But death threats have not stopped her from fighting for the rights of women around the world.
Rejection follows her
Irshad Manji, 46, was born in Uganda and moved to Canada when she was four. There, she grew up in a violent household. By the time she was 14, she was expelled from Islamic school for asking too many questions.
o she started studying Islam on her own. It was then, she says, that she realized she could reconcile her faith with different freedoms and rights.
For years, she has been a leading voice in the reform of Islam.
Her work has not been well received in many parts of the world, and she receives so many death threats that the windows of her apartment are bulletproof. During public appearances, Muslim extremists have stormed in and demanded her execution.
Manji said that receiving the award is about more than just Islam. It is about all human beings.
"This award represents for me the rare quality that I believe every human being has the capacity to develop, but most of us don't give ourselves the permission to develop, and that is moral courage  —  which means doing the right thing in the face of your fears," Manji said.
Imprisoned for 6 years
Rebiya Kadeer is known as the "Mother of all Uighurs," an oppressed Muslim population in northwest China.
Kadeer, 69, came from poverty. She is now a millionaire entrepreneur. But, mostly, she is one of the faces of the Uighurs, a group that says it has been victimized by the Chinese government for decades.
Kadeer held various posts in Chinese political life before being arrested in 1999 for passing publications to her husband, who at the time was living in the United States and working for Radio Free Asia and Voice of America. She was accused of providing confidential materials to a person outside of the Chinese territory.
In 2005, she was released and moved to the United States. She still is a fierce critic of the authorities in Beijing and their treatment of Chinese Muslims.
"The Uighur issue is not a Uighur problem,” Kadeer said. “It is a Chinese government problem. A situation generated by systematic denial to Uighurs of fundamental human rights and freedoms.”
http://www.voanews.com/content/three-women-muslim-countries-us-human-right-award/3098387.html
---------

Laws must enforced to end violence against women
December 11, 2015
Though there are tough laws and policies to combat violence against women, the crimes can only be stopped if those are implemented, said Jatiya Sangsad Speaker Dr Shirin Sharmin Chaudhury yesterday at the closing ceremony of the 16-day campaign to end violence against women.
She added, "It is important to make women aware of the acts and policies so that they seek legal redress whenever they are subjected to violence."
Members of parliament, country representatives of organisations working for women empowerment, civil society members, and heads of missions pledged commitment to prevent violence against women.
The programme was organised by UN Women at the South Plaza of Jatiya Sangsad Bhaban.
Salma Ali, executive director of Bangladesh National Woman Lawyers Association, said, "We often see perpetrators of violence getting bail and living a free life while their victims live like fugitives."
Aasha Mehreen Amin, deputy editor, Editorial and Op-ed at The Daily Star, said, "We are determined to highlight more the role of women in development, and social and economic progress to emphasise the need to create a violence-free environment for women and girls."
Ayesha Khanam, president of Bangladesh Mahila Parishad, emphasised the importance of focusing on issues that lead to violence against women.
Christine Hunter, country representative of UN Women, said violence against women occurs across the world. No countries would be able to develop without ending such violence.
Fazle Rabbi Miah, deputy speaker of the parliament, and Robert Watkins, resident coordinator of United Nations, among others, spoke.    
This year UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's UNiTE to End Violence against Women campaign was styled "Orange the world", using the colour designated by the UNiTE campaign to symbolise a brighter future without violence. Orange events were planned in more than 70 countries around the world ahead of and throughout the 16 days.
http://www.thedailystar.net/city/law-enforcement-must-end-violence-against-women-185638
---------

California shooting: IS ignored Tashfeen's contact attempts, say US sources
Dec 11, 2015
WASHINGTON: The militant Islamic State (IS) group ignored contact attempts from Tashfeen Malik in the months before she and her husband killed 14 people at a California holiday party, probably because they feared getting caught in a United States (US) law enforcement sting, US government sources said on Thursday.
The number of organisations that Malik, 29, tried to contact and how she sought to reach them were unclear, but the groups almost certainly included Al Qaeda's Syria-based official affiliate Al-Nusra Front, the government sources said.
One source said investigators have little, if any, evidence that Malik or her husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, had any direct contact with IS, which has seized control of large swaths of Syria and Iraq and claimed responsibility for the Nov 13 Paris attacks that left 130 people dead.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey has said Malik and Farook declared around the time of their attack that they were acting on behalf of IS ─ which in turn has embraced the couple as among its followers. But US government sources have said there was no evidence that the IS even knew of the couple before the killings.
Militant groups sought out by Malik likely ignored her approaches because they have become extremely wary of responding to outsiders they do not know or who have not been introduced to them, sources said.
Disclosures of Malik's overtures to extremists abroad surfaced as the investigation of the Dec 2 shooting rampage in San Bernardino took a new turn with divers searching a small lake near the scene of the massacre.
On Thursday a team of divers from the FBI and San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department began searching the waters of Seccombe Lake Park, about 2-1/2 miles north of the Inland Regional Center, seeking additional clues in the mass shooting.
The search of the lake, which could last for days, stemmed from an unspecified lead "indicating that the subjects came into this area" on the day of the attack, said David Bowdich, assistant director in charge of the FBI's Los Angeles field office.
"We put a dive team into the lake as a logical part of that lead." Bowdich said he would not discuss the "specific evidence we're looking for", but said it was essentially "anything that had to do with this particular crime". He added: "We may come up with nothing."
CNN reported they sought a computer hard drive that belonged to the couple.
'Not on the radar: US officials search for missed red flags
FBI Director James Comey, along with US Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and John Mulligan, deputy director of the National Counterterrorism Centre (NCC), briefed members of both houses of Congress on Thursday about the investigation in closed, classified sessions.
The US government appears not to have picked up on extremist messages exchanged during the online courtship two years ago between Farook and his then-fiancée in Pakistan, Tashfeen, federal officials told members of Congress ─ who are concerned red flags may have been missed in the last two years ─ during the closed-door briefings.
American officials say Farook and his wife, Malik, discussed martyrdom and jihad online as early as 2013. But the couple never surfaced on law enforcement's radar and Malik was able to enter the US on a fiancée visa last year despite having reportedly professed radical views online.
"The current impression is that these two people were acting alone," US Senator Angus King of Maine told CNN after the briefing. But he added that he was troubled by the fact that the couple had tried to cover their tracks by destroying their cellphones and other electronic equipment.
"Everyone's asking the same questions about how it is that law enforcement didn't know, or intelligence officials didn't know ─ that they could have flown under the radar and nothing gave an indication that they were a threat," said Rep. Jim Langevin, a Rhode island Democrat and member of the House Homeland Security Committee.
Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said Malik was subjected to an in-person interview during the application process for a visa.
Republican Rep. Will Hurd of Texas, a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, said there's currently no evidence Malik's radicalisation would have been readily apparent when she was evaluated for a fiancée visa. "I don't think there was missed information," he said. "It appears that there was not any evidence that would have been discoverable during an interview for a visa."
He declined to discuss what specifically led investigators to conclude that the couple had radicalised independently as early as 2013.
"It's safe to say that the information about what happened prior to their marriage and to the attacks in San Bernardino was acquired through forensic investigations of these individual lives," Hurd said. "These people weren't on the radar," he added.
Comey, who testified in the Senate on Wednesday, described Farook and Malik as examples of homegrown violent extremists who appear to have radicalised "in place", drawing a distinction between the California attack and the one last month in Paris that officials suspect involved planning and training in Syria.
He said the FBI did not yet know if Farook and Malik's marriage was arranged by a foreign extremist organisation.
'Farook's path towards extremism'
Investigators are trying to determine if Farook's path toward extremism predated 2013 and whether it led to plans to launch an attack in 2012, according to two people familiar with the investigation who were not authorised to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
New revelations show a much deeper connection between Farook and Enrique Marquez, his friend who bought the assault rifles used in the shooting, than previously was disclosed. Marquez has not been charged with a crime.
At least three years ago, Marquez purchased the high-powered weapons that Farook and his wife used in the shooting.
Marquez and Farook "were plotting an actual attack" in 2012, including buying weapons, but became apprehensive and shelved the plan because of law enforcement activity and arrests in the area, said Idaho Sen. Jim Risch, a Republican who sits on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
Marquez, 24, spoke with federal authorities after they raided his mother's Riverside house over the weekend. He and Farook were friends for years and became family last year, with a sister-in-law in common.
The two men were listed as witnesses on the marriage license when Farook's brother, Raheel, wed a Russian woman in 2011.
Three years later, Raheel Farook and his wife, Tatiana, were witnesses to Marquez's marriage to her sister, Mariya Chernykh, according to Riverside County records.
The ceremony took place at the Islamic Society of Corona-Norco, according to the marriage license, though the mosque's facility manager denied it occurred there.
Malik's father, reached in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, condemned his daughter's actions and said he is "very, very sad. ... I am in such pain that I cannot even describe it."
The father, Gulzar Ahmed Malik, has been a resident in the kingdom since the early 1980s, the Saudi Interior Ministry said. His daughter was from Pakistan but travelled to Saudi Arabia.
California shooting
Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik were killed in a shootout with police hours after they opened fire with assault rifles at a holiday gathering of Farook's co-workers at the Inland Regional Center social services agency in San Bernardino.
Fourteen people were killed, and the number of wounded was raised to 22 on Thursday from 21 after a woman injured in the assault came forward, officials said.
The FBI said it is treating the shooting attack as an act of terrorism. If the massacre proves to have been the work of killers inspired by militants, it would mark the deadliest such attack on US soil since Sept 11, 2011.
The attack has heightened security concerns in the US and become an issue in the US presidential campaign.
http://www.dawn.com/news/1225677/california-shooting-is-ignored-tashfeens-contact-attempts-say-us-sources
---------

Suicide attack by foreigner woman leaves 4 dead in Nangarhar
Dec 11 2015
At least four people were killed following a suicide attack carried out by a foreigner woman in eastern Nangarhar province of Afghanistan, local officials said Friday.
The incident took in Jalalabad, the provincial city of eastern Nangarhar province late on Thursday night.
Provincial governor spokesman said at least three children and an operative of the Afghan intelligence – National Directorate of Security (NDS) lost their lives in the attack.
There are no reports regarding the identity of the foreigner woman who detonated the explosives strapped in her body but Khogyani said the incident took place while the Afghan intelligence operatives were conducting a search on a group of suspected foreigners travellign in Daronta area.
Khogyani further added that five men were also among the group of the suspected foreigners travelling in a car when they were stopped for search and questioning.
Nangarhar is among the relatively volatile provinces in eastern Afghanistan where anti-government armed militant groups are actively operating.
Certain district of Nangarhar province have also became a hotbed for the insurgents pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) terrorist group.
http://www.khaama.com/suicide-attack-by-foreigner-woman-leaves-4-dead-in-nangarhar-1800
---------

Saudi Council Recommends Allowing Women To Obtain Passports Without Male Guardians
10 Dec 2015
Jaffa, Israel – The Security Affairs Committee of the Shoura Council, an arm of the Saudi Arabian parliament, has drafted a paper recommending that Saudi women be granted passports without permission from their male guardians, the Saudi news site Ozak reported.
The committee proposes extending the right to a passport to all woman holding Saudi identity cards. The recommendation will be voted on by parliament prior to its approval.
Saudi media predict that the law will pass after a series of fiery debates and opposition from conservative factions within the kingdom.
Under current law, Saudi women must have the approval of a “man in charge” for actions such as driving a car or divorce. Usually, the man is her father, husband, or brother.
Earlier this month, female divorcees and widows were granted ID cards that give them the authority to act independently of male guardians.
http://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2015/12/10/saudi-council-recommends-allowing-women-to-obtain-passports-without-male-guardians/
---------

16 Gulf women to climb region’s highest peak in Oman
December 10, 2015
Muscat: Sixteen women representing various GCC countries will climb Jebel Shams, the region’s highest peak via Western Hajar mountain.
The trek — from December 10 to 12, 2015 — is being organised by Husaak Adventures Company in collaboration with Oman’s Ministry of Tourism.
The three-day expedition will see the 16 female mountaineers make their way to Jebel Shams’ summit over 3,000 metres above sea level, said the Ministry of Tourism in a statement.
Asma Al Hajri, Deputy Director General, International Tourism Promotions in the Ministry, said: “We are happy to support the brave women in this exciting adventure. The trek to the summit of Jebel Shams offers a dynamic and truly unforgettable experience that challenges the athleticism of our participants. The trip reflects the spirit of solidarity within the Gulf region and the success of the hikers upon reaching the top [will be] commemorated by raising the flags of the GCC nations.”
The trek began in the afternoon of the first day with the group gathering at the designated meeting point in Muscat. The hike covered a distance of over 20km along a trail deemed suitable for fit and active individuals. The trail has been classified as safe by the relevant environmental authorities.“We look forward to more challenges in the future, where the qualities of fitness and endurance are tested by courageous and determined Gulf ladies,”, said Asma.
The group consists of Rumaitha Al Busaidi, Linda Al Muqimi, Salsabeel Al Busaidi representing Oman, Lulu Al Awadi, Dalal Al Omar, Sabika Al Ayyar, Nourah Al Sabah, Lamia Al Ghareeb and Aseel Al Shaheen from Kuwait, Nada Jamsheer, Hadya Fathhallah and Fatima Fathhallah from Bahrain.
Nahid Al Dosary and Budoor Al Shadawi from Saudi Arabia and Sharifa Yateem and Danah Ali from the UAE.
http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/oman/16-gulf-women-to-climb-region-s-highest-peak-in-oman-1.1635370
---------

Faith in their fight: Women campaign to scrap Haji Ali Dargah ban
Dec 11, 2015
A landmark mosque in Mumbai is facing pressure to overturn a ban on women entering its inner sanctum, a move that could set a precedent on gender restrictions to places of worship in India.
A Muslim women’s rights group is locked in a bitter legal battle with trustees of Mumbai’s Haji Ali Dargah, built in the 15th century and popular not only with Muslims but Hindu devotees and sight-seeing tourists.
Women have been prevented entry to the mosque’s mausoleum since 2011, with its trust saying close female proximity to the tomb of a revered saint is “a grievous sin” in Islam.
Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA) has petitioned the Bombay high court seeking a ruling that the ban is unconstitutional, hoping such a decision would mark a major step forward for women’s rights in India.
“A positive ruling would set a precedent and would have a wider and long-term effect,” BMMA co-founder Noorjehan Niaz told AFP.
Read: Scholars divided over allowing women in Haji Ali dargah
“It would send a message and encourage women of all religions who are barred from entering places of worship to approach courts with similar demands,” she added.
The mosque is located on an islet accessible via a causeway at low tide. It was built in the 1430s in memory of a wealthy Muslim who gave up his worldly possessions and went on a pilgrimage to Mecca.
The mosque is located on an islet accessible via a causeway at low tide. (Kunal Patil / HT Photo)
Legend has it that Pir Haji Ali Shah Bukhari, who became a Sufi saint, died during his spiritual journey and his body washed up on rocks in the Arabian Sea off south Mumbai.
The mosque was constructed on the spot where his body was found, and his tomb, or “dargah”, lies in the inner sanctum -- the mosque’s most sacred place.
Last month local media reported that a temple in Maharashtra suspended seven security guards after a female devotee stepped on a platform to worship an idol.
Women are barred from the stand and temple authorities later performed a “purification” ceremony on the idol, according to the reports.
‘Women are impure’
Haji Ali Dargah is one of Mumbai’s most recognisable landmarks and receives tens of thousands of visitors every week.
But Niaz said the trust started banning women from the mausoleum four years ago, although they are still allowed into the mosque’s other areas, where they can pray.
She said trustees cited menstruation as the reason for barring women entry to sacred spots, an argument often given by conservative elements.
Read: Allowing women inside Haji Ali dargah a sin, trust tells HC
“They’ve said women are impure. But menstruation is a natural event and responsible for the entire of humanity being born. How can it be dirty? It’s a ridiculous and demeaning argument,” she told AFP.
She complained to the board and then approached Maharashtra state’s minorities commission before launching legal action last year after making no progress.
“The shrine is symbolic for people of all castes, all religions and countries. It’s an iconic place and people travel from all over the world to visit it.”
Haji Ali Dargah is one of Mumbai’s most recognisable landmarks and receives tens of thousands of visitors every week. (AFP File Photo)
“How can you bar somebody from entering the sanctum just because she is a woman? The decision was anti-women and anti-Islamic and we had no option but to go to court. It was the last resort,” Niaz added.
A member of the trust declined comment when contacted by AFP on the grounds of sub-judice, saying only that he hoped Mumbai’s top court would settle the dispute when it holds its next hearing on December 15.
Maulana Mustaqeem Azmi, a member of the nonprofit All India Muslim Personal Law Board, said the rule was similar to those in other mosques.
“To insist that they be allowed into the tomb is against the religion,” he told AFP.
Human rights lawyers back the women, but are sceptical of whether their case will win. Instead, they are pushing for a law making it illegal for any trust to bar entry to a public place of worship on the grounds of gender.
“There are lots of temples where women are not allowed. If you go through each individual case it will be an endless exercise so you have to have state intervention,” prominent rights lawyer Mihir Desai stated.
“Courts also like to restrain themselves from ruling on religious issues. Whether the court will deliver a verdict in favour of the women is very doubtful,” he added.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/faith-in-their-fight-women-campaign-to-scrap-haji-ali-dargah-ban/story-0ztupfKrSg6UQN98h9wllO.html
---------

Awareness seminar on women status
December 11, 2015
LAHORE - An awareness seminar was arranged by Punjab Commission on the Status of Women at Lahore College for Women University in connection with the 16-day campaign against gender-based violence.
Chairperson of the Commission Fauzia Waqar, Vice Chancellor Lahore College for Women University Dr.
Uzma Qureshi, Director Women Institute of Learning and Leadership Dr Saira Shahid, Dr.
Farzana Nazir MPA, SHO Women Police Station Bushra Aziz, Umer Aftab of White Ribbon, Additional Advocate General Punjab Asma Hamid, Head Surgeon Medico-legal Punjab, Capt Waseem Haider besides faculty members were present.
Punjab Commission on the Status of Women Chairperson Fauzia Waqar in her address highlighted the aims and objectives of the campaign against gender-based violence and the role of the commission.
SHO Bushra Aziz informed about the efforts of police in curbing gender-based violence and protection of women.
Other speakers, while expressing their views, said that due to measures taken by the government women today feel safer and are striving for a change in social mindset.
They said that as human beings women have all basic rights and these rights are guaranteed by the constitution.
http://nation.com.pk/lahore/11-Dec-2015/awareness-seminar-on-women-status
---------

First Saudi vote campaign for women enters final day
December 11, 2015
RIYADH - Saudi Arabia’s first election campaign open to women ends on Thursday but voters see little chance of a breakthrough for female candidates.
More than 900 women, along with some 6,000 men, are seeking seats on 284 municipal councils whose powers are restricted to local affairs including streets, public gardens and rubbish collection. The vote has been hailed as a small step forward in the kingdom, one of the most restrictive countries in the world for women. But many voters said tribal allegiances - rather than a candidate’s gender - would be a big factor in the ballot.
Um Mohammed, a 47-year-old woman living near the Kuwaiti border, said her daughters had helped organise the campaign of a female candidate, but she herself would back a man.
“I am voting for this candidate because he is from our tribe and he will ensure our rights. He also has a good personality and we have never heard anything negative about him,” she said.
Her husband had dinner with the candidate at his campaign tent, helping to confirm their choice, she said.
Such tents - traditional male gathering places in Saudi Arabia that can be as large as houses - have been a common way for candidates to get their message across during Saudi municipal elections.
Ballots for local councils have taken place twice before, in 2005 and 2011, with only male candidates and voters.
Ruled for decades by the al-Saud royal family of King Salman, oil-rich Saudi Arabia has no elected legislature and has faced intense Western scrutiny over its rights record.
Um Mohammed may have chosen her candidate but whether she makes it to the polling station on Saturday is another matter.
Unable to drive and with no taxis in her community, Um Mohammed said she can only vote if her husband takes her, or if a group of women rent a car and driver together.
Saudi Arabia is the only country in the world where women are not allowed to drive. They must also cover themselves in black from head-to-toe in public and require permission from male family members to travel, work or marry.
There is a strict separation of sexes, which applies to election facilities as well as elsewhere like restaurants.
A slow expansion of women’s rights began under the late king Abdullah, Salman’s predecessor who died in January. Many have welcomed female participation in the ballot as a step forward for women’s rights.
The campaign has been a struggle however, with some women candidates barred from taking part and others withdrawing under pressure.
Another northeastern woman, who asked not to be named, said the female candidate she wanted to vote for pulled out of the election after local Islamic scholars objected.
“She withdrew after the scholars said it’s forbidden for a woman to run in the elections,” said the woman, a teacher. “I don’t believe the female candidates will be given much power even if they win.”
A male voter in the eastern city of Hafr al-Batin said it was difficult to know whether to support a woman candidate as men have been unable to meet them or see their faces.
“You have to work extra hard to understand” a female candidate, he said, while he could share food or coffee offered by male contenders.
“I don’t think any man here would vote for a woman,” the man said, adding that he will cast his ballot for a fellow tribesman. “Even without the campaign I already know he’s a good man,” he said, declining to be named.
A Western diplomat has said “it will be a huge positive surprise” if any women are actually elected on Saturday.
Still, he said he expects some will be appointed as only two-thirds of council seats are elected.
The campaign has been low key, with rules preventing photographs of candidates applied to both men and women.
Omar Mohammed, a 49-year-old accountant who will vote in the Red Sea city of Jeddah, said he had not come across any female campaigners. “I will probably vote for one of the men,” he said.
http://nation.com.pk/international/11-Dec-2015/first-saudi-vote-campaign-for-women-enters-final-day
---------

Campaign ends for first Saudi vote with women participation
Dec 11, 2015
THE first Saudi election campaign open to women ended on Thursday but voters see little chance of a breakthrough for female candidates.
More than 900 women, along with some 6,000 men, are seeking seats on 284 municipal councils whose powers are restricted to local affairs including streets, public gardens and rubbish collection.
The vote has been hailed as a step forward. But many voters said tribal allegiances — rather than a candidate’s gender — would be a big factor in the ballot.
Um Mohammed, a 47-year-old woman living near the Kuwaiti border, said her daughters had helped organize the campaign of a female candidate, but she herself would back a man.
“I am voting for this candidate because he is from our tribe and he will ensure our rights. He also has a good personality and we have never heard anything negative about him,” she said.
Her husband had dinner with the candidate at his campaign tent, helping to confirm their choice, she said.
Such tents — traditional male gathering places in Saudi Arabia that can be as large as houses — have been a common way for candidates to get their message across during Saudi municipal elections.
Ballots for local councils have taken place twice before, in 2005 and 2011, with only male candidates and voters.
Um Mohammed may have chosen her candidate but whether she makes it to the polling station on Saturday is another matter.
Unable to drive and with no taxis in her community, Um Mohammed said she can only vote if her husband takes her, or if a group of women rent a car and driver together.
Saudi Arabia is the only country in the world where women are not allowed to drive. They require permission from male family members to travel, work or marry.
Like elsewhere in the country, strict separation of sexes applies to election facilities.
Women’s rights in the Kingdom took a leap under the late King Abdullah, who died in January. Many have welcomed female participation in the ballot as a step forward for women’s rights.
The campaign has been a struggle however, with some women candidates barred from taking part and others withdrawing under pressure.
Another northeastern woman, who asked not to be named, said the female candidate she wanted to vote for pulled out of the election after local scholars objected.
“She withdrew after the scholars said it’s forbidden for a woman to run in the elections,” said the woman, a teacher.
“I don’t believe the female candidates will be given much power even if they win.”
A male voter in the eastern city of Hafr Al-Batin said it was difficult to know whether to support a woman candidate as men have been unable to meet them or see their faces.
“You have to work extra hard to understand” a female candidate, he said, while he could share food or coffee offered by male contenders.
“I don’t think any man here would vote for a woman,” the man said, adding that he will cast his ballot for a fellow tribesman.
“Even without the campaign I already know he’s a good man,” he said, declining to be named.
A Western diplomat has said “it will be a huge positive surprise” if any women are actually elected on Saturday.
Still, he said he expects some will be appointed as only two-thirds of council seats are elected.
The campaign has been low key, with rules preventing photographs of candidates applied to both men and women.
Omar Mohammed, a 49-year-old accountant who will vote in Jeddah, said he had not come across any female campaigners. “I will probably vote for one of the men,” he said.
http://saudigazette.com.sa/saudi-arabia/campaign-ends-for-first-saudi-vote-with-women-participation/
---------

Muslim women launch developmental organization
Dec 11, 2015
By Mathias Mazinga
Uganda Muslim Women’s Civilization Initiative, a local non-governmental organization that aims at empowering women spiritually and economically was on Thursday launched at Hotel Africana with a call on government and civil society to worker harder to end gender-based violence.
Speaking at the function, the US Embassy Charge d’affaires, Patricia Mahoney, who was the chief-guest, expressed concern over the persistent subjugation and harassment of women, which was evident world-wide.
“UN statics indicate that one third of women have experienced physical or sexual violence in their lives.  This is unacceptable. It is totally inhuman. We have to change this status quo now. Be the change and start right now,” said Mahoney.
Mahoney thanked the Executive Director of the organization, Shamirah Namutebi, for coming up with a sustainable initiative to promote women’s economic empowerment.
“It is ideal that women who are economically empowered so promote the economic empowerment of other women. If women are economically empowered, they will become self-sustaining and will thus be able to make independent decisions in their families and in society. They will advocate for their children’s rights, stop early marriages and lower HIV infections in their communities.”
Mahoney further asked Muslim women to work in solidarity with men and other faith-based organizations to promote development and religious co-existence.
The Chairman of Zakkah and Waqaf Committee, Sheikh Anas Kaliisa asked Muslim scholars to properly interpret the teachings of Islam about women. He said that off all the religions of the world, it was Islam which had fully liberated women from gender-slavery.
“There is no religion that encourages education like Islam. If you educate a girl, you will come walking hand in hand with her on the Day of Judgment. Islam also teaches that if a wife owns a business, it is hers entirely. But the business of the husband belongs to the family. So, where do people get these theologies that subjugate women?!
So, empower women and improve communities. Women, go out and do business. But be mindful to respect your husband.”
The organization’s Executive Director, Shamirah Namutebi said that they got the idea to start the organization after being inspired by the councils of Imam Mohammad Bashar Arafat, the President of Islamic Affaire Council of Maryland, USA, who strongly advocates for women’s empowerment.
What the Muslim women say
Hawa Kimbugwe
The contemporary economic challenges direly call for the empowerment of women of all religious creeds, which is why we need faith-based women’s organisations.
Mayi Buwembo
We need to come together as women, to do activities together and inspire each other. In this way we shall be empowered and subsequently alleviate poverty.
Fatuma Kasoga
If we wait for government to help us, we shall die poor. Let us just work with organisations like Uganda Muslim Women Civilization Initiative to transform our lives.
Sharifah Naigaga
I have benefitted a lot from the presentations of progressive women. I have resolved to start a business at home.
Shrifah Kyeyune
I am the PRO of Uganda Muslim Women Civilization Initiative.  It is our duty, the enlightened women, to empower the disadvantaged women.
Shamirah Namutebi
I am the Executive Director of Uganda Women Civilization Initiative. We desire to give disadvantaged women life skills, guidance and formal literacy to help them become financially self-sustenance. We shall work with other faith-based organisations to help our people attain self-sustenance.
http://www.newvision.co.ug/news/676752-muslim-women-launch-developmental-organization.html
---------

Inside a container, visitors hear story of an abused woman
December 10, 2015
Dubai: The Dubai Foundation for Women and Children (DFWAC) on Thursday launched a three-day interactive platform to highlight violence against women, which remains behind closed doors as victims rarely speak up.
The platform set up at Jumeirah Beach Residence (JBR) inside an orange container invites visitors to a dark, cold room to listen to a five-minute heart-wrenching soundtrack of a woman who is abused by her alcoholic husband.
The audio narrative, based on a true story, is done by an actor, but captures in vivid detail mental trauma faced by a woman from her abusive husband, a man everyone thought was an ideal partner. She had to always surrender to him and keep quiet for the good of her family, but at one point she tells listeners she decided to speak about it.
The touching and emotional soundtrack is part of the Orange Campaign to raise awareness of violence against women, under the slogan, “Speak Up! Silence Covers Violence.”
It urges women to contact authorities and seek help by calling the helpline number, 800111.
Organised for the first time in the UAE, the campaign — which runs until this weekend — joins hands with the United Nations international campaign to stem violence against women.
“Seven out of 10 women experience violence in their lifetime, according to the UN,” said Fatima Al Falasi, the project manager, who was behind the concept. “Through this platform, we wanted to provoke people’s emotions by getting them inside the victim’s shoe and making them experience the pain she goes through for keeping silent,” she said.
Al Falasi said that it might not be them experiencing violence, but it could be someone they know. “They can think about that person and encourage them to seek help. More women are speaking up about domestic violence, so it’s a good sign but we still need to do more.”
Over 1,500 cases of domestic violence against women have been reported to the DFWC during the last seven years. The cases involved Dubai women residents over the age of 18, who come from different nationalities and have faced physical, emotional, or psychological domestic violence by men in their families.
Al Falasi added there is no country in the world which is free of violence against women. Over 600 million women live in countries where domestic violence is not yet considered a crime. “People need to identify signs and symptoms of abuse on the people they know, because there are some identifiable health effects, including social ones. Our brochures are available for people to pick up and our foundation is there to provide immediate intervention, psychological help and shelter to women who suffer from domestic violence.”
On Thursday, many visitors walked out of the container in tears.
Al Falasi said a couple were both in tears because the wife remembered her abusive ex-husband and her current husband remembered his mum being abused by his father when he was a child.
Shamma Al Falasi, who heard the soundtrack said the session brought home the pain of victims vividly as she closed her eyes and listened. “Although I haven’t experienced domestic violence, but I felt her pain. If I knew someone who’s getting abused, I will not allow them to stay quiet,” she said.
Madura Nayagam and his wife Sumithra were also touched by the soundtrack and said: “It was a short presentation, but it got to us immediately. We are aware of such things and if we know someone we will help them.”
Orange lights are being lit up in JBR for residents to identify the campaign and Al Falasi said the container will be moving to different places in a few months. The foundation will also continue to organise lectures and events for the same cause.
http://gulfnews.com/news/uae/culture/inside-a-container-visitors-hear-story-of-an-abused-woman-1.1635360
---------

Bahrain puts spotlight on women's status
December 11, 2015
Manama: As the six heads of delegations sat around the impressive table in the august hall, the gender split was clear.
Only one woman was representing her country at the annual Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) meeting of the heads of foreign media while five men represented the other members.
The GCC, established in 1981, comprises Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
“It may raise brows, but the percentage is exactly the same as the that of the women attending the World Economic Forum (WEF) at Davos, which has now stuck at 17 per cent for the past few years,” Khawla, a Bahraini woman, said.
For Bahrain, being represented by a woman at the national level even within the GCC is not unusual or a breakthrough in its traditions.
Maysa Al Dhawadi has been representing Bahrain at such meetings for the last three years after she took over from another woman, Noor Al Rumaihi.
And whenever there is now a group picture for the GCC foreign media heads, Maysa is the only woman.
When the GCC Days were held in the Japanese capital in April, Maysa was the only woman standing with 23 men standing on the stage. And she did not feel intimidated in any way as she oozed self-confidence.
For Bahraini women, taking centre stage or holding high positions has become an accomplished fact. In fact, Bahraini women today talk more about partnerships with men in the nation-building process and in exerting professional efforts at all levels.
Formal knowledge acquisition, political rights, opportunities to vote and run in elections and chances to hold advanced positions in institutions and companies are facts of life that are now deeply-rooted in the collective consciousness of the people and in all legal texts.
Pioneer
Bahrain, often cited as a pioneer in the region in championing women’s rights, has been pressing for a greater political, economic and social empowerment of women across all areas.
“Bahrain is constantly striving to involve women alongside men in the nation-building process based on the belief that women are a key element in the development of the country,” King Hamad Bin Eisa Al Khalifa said last year. “Bahrain is also eager to open wider areas for Bahraini women to serve their country in the political, economic and social areas. Bahraini women are efficient and competent and they have an important role in the development and prosperity of their homeland and in bringing up their children and offering them sound guidance,” the King said.
The women’s rights movement started in the 20th century, but it was consolidated at the official level by the establishment in 2001 of the Supreme Council for Women, the entity tasked with elevating the status of women in the kingdom and ensuring they receive their fair share in both rights and duties.
National strategies to empower women politically, socially and economically were designed and implemented. Companies were motivated to hire more women staff and to advance and promote women to higher positions through national rewards.
Women were trained on all aspects of participating in elections and were encouraged to take part in running and voting to ensure their voices and voted counted.
While in 2002, it was a novelty in the modern history of Bahrain, the sight of women campaigning to be elected has now become highly familiar.
Within ministries, several women have been promoted to advanced positions and many private companies today pride themselves on appointing women to top levels.
The 2014 joint report by the Organization for Economic Development (OECD) and the Centre of Arab Woman for Training and Research, an advocacy group for the improvement of women’s status and of data collection, indicators and statistics, said that Bahrain had the highest percentage of women in senior and middle management positions in the public sector among the countries studied in the region.
The percentage of women employed in the public sector in administrative senior positions was 45 per cent, a figure that exceeds the 29.1 per cent regional average for MENA countries. In addition, Bahraini women’s share of public middle management positions at 59 per cent surpasses that of men.
The rising profile of Bahraini women was internationally acknowledged when Shaikha Haya Bint Rashid Al Khalifa was elected president of the 61st United Nations General Assembly in June 2006.
Women in high positions
Bahrain has several women who hold high positions as ministers, ambassadors, diplomats, and judges.
“When we mention Bahrain, we are talking about a country that has, thanks to the reforms launched by His Majesty King Hamad, been witnessing high levels of women’s empowerment,” Maysa said at a GCC Forum.
“Bahraini women have been essential partners in drawing up and implementing plans and programmes for a comprehensive development of the country. They have had a pivotal role in the nation-building process, thanks to their full political and economic rights enshrined in the constitution and in laws that promote and defend equality and equal opportunities in line with international standards and criteria. We value highly the efforts of the Supreme Council for Women to elevate the status of Bahraini women and to empower them politically, economically and socially,” Maysa said.
Under an initiative by Princess Sabeeka Bint Ebrahim Al Khalifa, wife of King Hamad and Chairwoman of the Supreme Council for Women, December 1 was designated as the Bahraini Women’s Day so that the nation in unison pays tribute to women.
The day was last week again celebrated with great fanfare and outstanding women were publicly recognized for their work and contributions.
Last week, King Hamad commended the crucial role of Bahraini women in the kingdom's development process and emphasised Bahrain's commitment to providing full support to them as they continue their progress.
However, Bahrainis are not falling into self-complacency. They are well aware that while several miles have been covered, the way ahead is still long and arduous at times.
An international conference on ‘’ Women in Public Life: From Policies to Impact" held this week stressed the importance of formulating national guidance instruments that would be assist policymakers in Bahrain on how to use existing parliamentary tools in following up the efforts to raise levels of women’s development and close any gaps.
http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/bahrain/bahrain-puts-spotlight-on-women-s-status-1.1635517


From the Heart of a Muslim

From the Heart of a Muslim






By Tawfik Hamid
I was born a Muslim and lived all my life as a follower of Islam. After the barbaric terrorist attacks done by the hands of my fellow Muslims everywhere on this globe, and after the too many violent acts by Islamists in many parts of the world, I feel responsible as a Mus-lim and as a human being, to speak out and tell the truth to protect the world and Muslims as well from a coming catastrophe and war of civilizations.
I have to admit that our current Islamic teaching creates violence and hatred toward Non-Muslims. We Muslims are the ones who need to change. Until now we have accepted polygamy, the beating of women by men, and killing those who convert from Islam to other religions.
We have never had a clear and strong stand against the concept of slavery or wars, to spread our religion and to subjugate others to Islam and force them to pay a humiliating tax called Jizia. We ask others to respect our religion while all the time we curse non-Muslims loudly (in Arabic) in our Friday prayers in the Mosques.
What message do we convey to our children when we call the Jews "Descendants of the pigs and monkeys"... Is this a message of love and peace, or a message of hate?
I have been in churches and synagogues where they were praying for Muslims, while we curse Christians and Jews, and teach our children to call them infidels and to hate them.
We immediately jump in a 'knee jerk reflex' to defend Prophet Mohammed when someone accuses him of being a pedophile while, at the same time, we are proud with the story in our Islamic books, that he married a young girl seven years old (Aisha) when he was above 50 years old.
I am sad to say that many, if not most of us, rejoiced in happiness after September 11th and after many other terror attacks.
Muslims denounce these attacks to look good in front of the media, but we condone the Islamic terrorists and sympathize with their cause. Till now our 'reputable' top religious authorities have never issued a Fatwa or religious statement to proclaim Bin Laden as an apostate, while an author, like Rushdie, was declared an apostate who should be killed according to Islamic Sharia law just for writing a book criticizing Islam.
Muslims demonstrated to get more religious rights as we did in France to stop the ban on the Hijab (Muslim head scarf), while we did not demonstrate with such passion and in such numbers against the terrorist murders.
It is our absolute silence against the terrorists that gives the energy to these terrorists to con-tinue doing their evil acts. We Muslims need to stop blaming our problems on others or on the Israeli/ Palestinian conflict. As a mat-ter of honesty, Israel is the only light of democracy, civilization, and human rights in the whole Middle East.
We kicked out the Jews with no compensation or mercy from most of the Arab countries to make them "Jew-Free countries" while Israel accepted more than a million Arabs to live there, have its nationality, and enjoy their rights as human beings. In Israel , women cannot be beaten legally by men, and any person can change his/her belief system with no fear of being killed by the Islamic law of 'Apostasy,' while in our Islamic world people do not enjoy any of these rights. I agree that the “Palestinians” suffer, but they suffer because of their corrupt leaders and not because of Israel.
It is not common to see Arabs who live in Israel leaving to live in the Arab world. On the other hand, we used to see thousands of Palestinians going to work with happiness in Israel, its 'enemy.' If Israel treats Arabs badly as some people claim, surely we would have seen the opposite happening.
We Muslims need to admit our problems and face them. Only then we can treat them and start a new era to live in harmony with human mankind. Our religious leaders have to show a clear and very strong stand against polygamy, pedophilia, slavery, killing those who convert from Islam to other religions, beating of women by men, and declaring wars on non-Muslims to spread Islam.
Then, and only then, do we have the right to ask others to respect our religion. The time has come to stop our hypocrisy and say it openly: “We Muslims have to change.”
- Tawfik Hamid is a former Egyptian extremist who is now an Islamic reformer fighting against Radical Islam. He is part of the Potomac Institute.
Source: petahtikvah.com/Articles/FromtheHeartofaMuslim.htm

These People Are Fighting Anti-Muslim Hate After San Bernardino

These People Are Fighting Anti-Muslim Hate After San Bernardino








By Jaweed Kaleem
12/07/2015
"ISIS wants to create a division between Christians and Muslims."
Following last week's mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, which was carried out by Muslims who FBI officials say were Islamic State supporters, American mosques and Muslims have been hit with threats and attacks.
That includes a severed pig’s head being discovered in front of a Philadelphia mosque, a food store owner in New York City being attacked by a man who said he would "kill Muslims," and a man breaking in to and vandalizing the Islamic Center of Palm Beach in Florida.
Yet, amid the onslaught of vitriol being directed at American Muslims that civil rights group say began picking up after last month's terrorist attacks on Paris and several politicians' statements against Muslim refugee resettlement, many Americans are coming together to protect and support the Islamic community.
In other words, despite presidential candidate Donald Trump saying on Monday that he wants to indefinitely ban all Muslims from coming to the U.S., there are plenty of Americans eagerly standing beside the nation’s nearly 3 million Muslims.
Houston, Texas -- Bay Area Unitarian Universalist Church
Dozens of the church's members rallied on Friday in support of its neighboring mosque, the Clear Lake Islamic Center, holding signs saying "love thy neighbor no exceptions" and "we support our Muslim neighbors."
"It’s important to stand on the side of respect and love and tolerance," the Rev. Peter Morales, president of the Unitarian Universalist Association, told the Associated Press. Ibrahim Ezghair, associate imam at the mosque, called the event "a really nice gesture."
Los Angeles, California -- Islamic Center of San Gabriel Valley
After a prayer service on Friday, officers from the Los Angeles Police Department and federal officials talked to the community about the San Bernardino attacks and how they can help people of all religious backgrounds stay safe in the area. The event included Muslim law enforcement officials, such as Sgt. Mike Abdeen from the department’s community relations unit.
"Law enforcement reached out to us and asked if they could address the community to ensure them that they are protected like all American and to not feel afraid of backlash," mosque member Ali Jakvani told The Huffington Post. "In times when Muslims are being attacked in retaliation to the killings in San Bernardino, I’m glad to see people standing up for the Muslim community."
Lynwood, Washington -- "Love in a Time of Fear"
In Lynwood, north of Seattle, Christians and Muslims are planning to hold an interfaith event called "Love in a Time of Fear" at Trinity Lutheran Church on Dec. 14.
"We put together this event in hopes that we could push back on this cycle of fear that could go out of control on us," pastor Terry Kyllo of Catacomb Churches told local news outlet KOMO. "The Christian community, and especially the Lutheran and Episcopal community, have a responsibility to stand with Muslims at a time when increasingly they are being scapegoated."
Nationwide -- Jewish Voice for Peace
During each night of Hanukkah, which began Sunday, Jewish Voice for Peace members plan to gather in different American cities, where they will hold signs shaped like a menorah in order to declare their stand against Islamophobia and their support for refugees.
The actions kicked off in New York City and will continue throughout the holiday in Miami; Chicago; Washington, D.C.; Portland, Oregon; Durham, North Carolina; Columbus, Ohio; Seattle; Atlanta; Boston; Ithaca, New York; Springfield, Massachusetts; Denver and Providence, Rhode Island.
Fargo, North Dakota -- Muslims and Friends Against ISIS
"Fargo/Moorhead Muslims and Friends Against ISIS," a Facebook group two friends launched on Saturday after discussing tensions in their community over Muslims, gained nearly 800 members by Monday night.
The group has become a meeting spot for locals to not only vent about anti-Muslim fervor, but to figure out ways to combat it.
"ISIS wants to create a division between Christians and Muslims where what I want to do is to create a unity, a solidarity, where we can all voice the same concerns and stand up to these inhumane acts," co-founder Shinwar Mayi, a Muslim who immigrated to the U.S. from Kurdistan 24 years ago, told WDAY.
Muslims United For San Bernardino
A campaign on LaunchGood, a Muslim-run crowdfunding website, has raised more than $64,000 since Dec. 3 for the San Bernardino community. The money will go toward funeral expenses and long-term recovery for the area, including the Inland Regional Center, where the shooting happened.
"We wish to respond to evil with good, as our faith instructs us, and send a powerful message of compassion through action," reads the campaign page. "Our Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, said: 'Have mercy to those on earth, and the One in the Heavens (God) will have mercy upon you.' And the Quran teaches to 'Repel evil by that which is better’ (41:34).'"
Washington, D.C. -- Shiite Anti-ISIS March
In another Muslim-led action, hundreds of of Shiites in Washington, D.C., turned an annual spiritual march into an anti-Islamic State rally on Friday. Muslims in the march gave passersby hot chocolate and doughnuts and engaged them in conversation,  The Washington Post reported. They also carried signs reading, "Muslims against ISIS" and "American Shia Muslims stand with the victims of San Bernardino."
Marchers wore black to mourn the deaths in San Bernardino as well as Imam Husain, a relative of the Islamic prophet and the spiritual leader of Shiites who were martyred in the year 680.
Source: goo.gl/Wx0E7z

The Cancer of Islamic Extremism

The Cancer of Islamic Extremism




By Uzma Yunus
10/12/2015
The attack in San Bernardino by the extremist couple has been an utter shock to America. It has been terrifying and mind-numbing to see a family transform into a killing unit, ruthlessly and mercilessly. Especially unexpected has been the violence from a woman and mother. It has been particularly unnerving to see the sanctity of motherhood translate into pure evil and hate.
Being a Muslim, this is even harder to digest.
Syed Rizwan Farook had just finished memorizing the entire Quran, a process that is long and tedious and is considered a great accomplishment for a man of faith. Ms. Tashfeen Malik educated from a University and a Religious institute, a purdah- observing role model Muslimah who appeared to be following the religion in an outstanding manner.
Overtly they looked like exemplary Muslims. The truth was far from it.
Everyone is struggling to make sense of this. This attack has shaken up the core trust of an average American in seemingly normal and peaceful Muslims living in this country. It feels like a betrayal from within. As if something native has rebelled against itself. This situation very reminiscent of a mutated cancer cell from one's own body trying to gradually take away all that matters...life, happiness and internal resources,and replacing it with fear and anxiety.
The extremism of these radical Islamists carries also, a deep betrayal of the very faith they claimed to follow. It seems that that the Muslim world has a serious disease. A disease called "Cancer of Extremism," as diagnosed by the President himself.
Having spent the last two years of my life more or less thinking and writing about cancer, I consider this metaphor of cancer for Islamic Extremism extremely apt and useful.
Starting as a small occult focus quite a while ago, this illness is now raging and threatening through the entire Muslim world and now posing a threat globally. The cancer is proliferating and very little has been done to thwart its rapid progression. We all know and understand that time is of the essence in cancer treatment.
The moment has arrived where the Muslim world needs to comprehend this fact that just as only few cancer cells can lodge themselves, in a location of choice and then recruit more cells and grow from there, this threat is frighteningly real. The narrative that it's only few extreme ones, not all "cells," does not reduce the fear or the severity of the threat. A few are enough to malign the whole body. That's exactly what is happening to Muslims in the West. Muslims find themselves in position of having to constantly apologize and condemn the actions of a few evil ones.
In a cancer patient, it is the few mutant militant "jihadi" cells that can take the entire body down. Ignore them and horrific consequences are likely. They are indeed a minority but a violent force to be reckoned with.
And to treat those few, the entire body has to take a beating through chemotherapy.
Right now all 1.6 billion are feeling threatened and apprehensive, by the cancer itself and the symptoms generated by this disease process. The rest will come as the side effect of the treatments.
Any rapidly growing cell, whether cancer or not, is destroyed by chemotherapy. That is what is called Collateral Damage, also a real imminent threat to all Muslims.
The Collateral Damage. I wonder if there is a way around it. The Islamophobia will sadly be the unfair price to pay for cure. The treatment team takes every possible precaution to minimize damage while offering treatment, but it does happen and I suspect it will.
The diagnosis of cancer is scary. The Muslim world has been diagnosed with cancer. Mostly of the "cells" in the body are doing what they are supposed to, peaceful and calm, minding their own business , albeit few cancer cells that are growing rapidly and at the cost of others, growth for the sake of domination and planning to take over the entire body.
Unfortunately due to fear, the Muslim world remains in "denial" -- a very common phenomenon with cancer diagnosis. It's hard to accept. It's hard to accept having been betrayed by your own body. Some that aren't in denial are either filled with fear or anger. Having cancer evokes feelings of helplessness. Muslims are feeling it against the rising wave of hate and bigotry.
The question arises .Why do some cells have this propensity to self-propagate and become cancerous? Is it genetic? Is it damaged DNA or is it environmental exposure?
All the same questions in the Muslim world. How is it happening? Who is driving this wave of radicalism? What is the end point?
It's time the Muslim world signed up for "treatment."There is treatment before the terminal stage.
The dream of the cancer cell is to establish domination. This need to be stopped. There is time yet to treat it. Recovery is possible from cancer. But treatment is necessary. Band-Aids won't work.
A comprehensive treatment plan requires new drugs, new approaches and new strategies. It's time to reconsider how we approach and think about our religion and how we incorporate it in our lives. It's time we abandon thought processes that are divisive and judgmental. We need to move to ideology consistent with this time and age. Slavery in the Muslim world was abolished with consensus. Why can't some other practices be abandoned that aren't relevant to this world that we live in, in this century?
The values of tolerance and mutual respect along with freedom and justice must prevail.
Survival chances will improve only if attention is paid to the outcome and staying the course of treatment. We need remission. I see hope. We need to survive, for our values, for our freedom and for what is dear to us.
We can no longer ignore the symptoms, no longer ignore the pain.
Can we beat this cancer within?
Denial won't make the cancer disappear; it will just delay treatment till its no longer curable.
Cure is a lofty goal with cancer. The need of the time is for all Muslims to join hands. All sects, all groups in the Muslim world need to respond to this deadly imminent threat that has infiltrated us. The mutant cells arose from within; our own immune system has to mount a response along with strategic and effective treatment regimen.
President Obama, himself, emphatically urged the muslims to confront this challenge within.
A small window is opening, will we choose to look or turn away?
Source: goo.gl/SRMRBT

Indian Muslim orthodoxy's response to demands of modernity: Can Muslims co-exist with other religious communities in plural societies?

Indian Muslim orthodoxy's response to demands of modernity: Can Muslims co-exist with other religious communities in plural societies?





Sultan Shahin, Editor, New Age Islam
16 November 2015
What kind of reform does modernity demand from the orthodoxy?  Essentially, it asks Muslims to come out of the insidious trap of supremacism, the dream of making Islam the sole religion of the world, ruling over the world through an Islamic caliph. It demands that Muslims coexist with other religious communities, respect other religions and cultures, grant equal rights to all citizens, practice gender equality and justice for all, in short, follow the UN human rights charter,  etc. Each one of these goals is supported by the foundational scripture of Islam, the Holy Quran, if only we Muslims were to go by the Qur'anic dictum of finding the best meaning of Qur'anic verses (as exhorted in Chapter 39: verse 55, 39: 18; 39: 55; 38: 29; 2: 121; 47: 24, etc). They would also do well to follow the recent advise of His Holiness Pope Francis to find an "adequate interpretation" of the Qur'anic verses. So the Quran and Pope Francis are both saying that Muslims should not follow the verses literally but seek to interpret it in the best or most adequate way possible.
Historically, Islam has produced a galaxy of thinkers, philosophers, mystics, theologians, Quran exegetes and experts in Hadith Studies. Debates and discussions called Kalam have been the norm rather than an exception in Islamic tradition, whether the rulers were intolerant tyrants or broadminded liberals. Even the rationalist Mu`tazila flourished for a time during the 8th - 10th centuries. Many of the greatest Islamic thinkers spent years in prison, went to the gallows, but never flinched from exercising their right to free thinking and expression.
 It's only Salafi-Wahhabi Islam that prohibits discussion and debates on theological issues. Saudi Arabia has been spending tens of billions of dollars to spread this rigid, desiccated, desert version of Islam, called "puritan" in the West. Islamism is a variation of this interpretation which calls for spreading Islam by force. Jihadism is another offshoot that actually seeks to implement it with the force of arms and terrorism.
Under Salafism's widespread impact, contemporary Indian Islam presents a rather dismal picture. There is an almost complete stagnation in conversation on issues of vital concern. The very mention of religion or theology in the context of Islamist terrorism, for instance, is frowned upon. Muslim societies around the world are producing armies of Islamist, Jihadi, suicide bombers wherever required by motivated groups, while suicide is considered one of the most heinous crimes in Islam. But Indian ulema are almost completely silent.  This silence became deafening when the self-declared Khalifa al-Baghdadi said on 13 May 2015 that "Islam has never been a religion of peace, not even for a day, and that it has always been a religion of war." Not one alim (scholar) in India protested or condemned it.
A 2013 PEW poll conducted in eleven Muslim-majority countries showed that support for suicide bombing against civilians in defence of Islam has declined in recent years. Nevertheless, the numbers of people who still think that this form of violence against non-combatants is “often” or “sometimes” justified are sobering: Egypt (25 percent), Indonesia (6 percent), Jordan (12 percent), Lebanon (33 percent), Malaysia (27 percent), Nigeria (8 percent), Pakistan (3 percent), the Palestinian territories (62 percent), Senegal (18 percent), Tunisia (12 percent), and Turkey (16 percent). There are 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide. If even 10 percent support suicide bombing against civilians in defence of the faith, that’s 160 million supporters of terrorism. (www.pewglobal.org)
Indian Muslim clerics or even intelligentsia do not seem bothered by such studies. An argument is made, even by our strategic thinkers, that no Indian Muslims joined al-Qaeda and few have gone to fight for ISIS, and so it can be concluded that Indian Islam is immune to the lure of Jihadism. But joining ISIS cannot be the measure of the extent of radicalisation. If anything, Indian Muslim society is even more conservative or fundamentalist than say, neighbouring Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Before Partition of the Indian sub-continent in 1947, Indian Muslim community had an iniquitous Muslim personal law, promulgated by the British.  Thirteen years after Partition Pakistan reformed these Anglo-Mohammedan laws to make them more gender equitable. Promulgated by Gen. Ayyub Khan in 1961, these reforms are working in Pakistan and Bangladesh for half a century, acceptable to all schools of thought. But no government in India has had the guts to bring about similar changes in India's Muslim Personal Law due to determined opposition from our fundamentalist ulema, silently supported by the Muslim intelligentsia. Indeed, if anything, these laws have been made more stringent and iniquitous.
A recent study indicates that 92.1 percent of Muslim women in India want a total ban on instant oral divorce, also known as triple talaq. But our governments are unable to do even this much, while Pakistani and Bangladeshi laws ensure that divorce is effective only after it has been approved by the court, marriages and divorces are registered, permission is sought from the court for second and subsequent marriage(s), etc. Our courts have tried to intervene and provide justice to Muslim women on the premise that Islam is a religion of compassion, but our scholars reject that proposition, just as they reject the proposition that Islam is a religion of peace by remaining silent when self-declared Khalifa Baghdadi says that Islam is a religion of war and strife.
Some fatwas do occasionally come making a general claim that Islam is a religion of peace, which, of course, it is. But the ulema's claim is absolutely suspect and hypocritical in the absence of any disavowal of the theology of violence, supremacism, exclusivism and xenophobia on the basis of which terrorism is pursued.  Is it any wonder that the country is faced today with an unprecedented challenge. Radicalisation among Muslim youth is deepening by the day. Faced with a fierce onslaught of Wahhabi-Salafi-Ahl-e-Hadeesi campaign of what they call real, true, pure Islam, many Muslims, particularly educated youth are succumbing to the lure. While hundreds of Salafi-Jihadi websites, blogs, television channels, newspapers, magazines, etc  promote an extremist interpretation of Islam, there is hardly any counter-narrative other than on New Age Islam that consistently, systematically refutes this ideology.
The reason for the Jihadi ideology's success in attracting Muslim youth is simple. For hundreds of years now, Muslim theologians have been engaged in creating a coherent theology of xenophobia and violence in order to expand the Islamic reach. Classical luminaries of Islam such as Imam Ghazali, Ibn-e-Taimiya, Sheikh Sarhandi, Abdul Wahhab, and Shah Wali Allah to 20th century theologians such as Syed Qutb, Hasan Al-Banna and Maulana Maududi have worked out a theology which promotes the view that Islam must conquer the world. Genuine Sufis like Mansour al-Hallaj and Ibn-e-Arabi had a very different view, and looked at Islam as a spiritual path to salvation. But, in their times, Sufis did not feel the need to evolve a coherent theology of peace and pluralism. The Sufis who did engage in theology focussed on making Islam more acceptable and respectable to orthodoxy. The greatest Sufi theologian Imam Ghazali (died: December 19, 1111), for instance, said that Muslims should go for Jihad at least once a year. He was quoting from and outlining Imam Shafi's legal tradition. Another Sufi who engaged in theology, Imam Ibn-e-Taimiyya (died: September 26, 1328), the inspiration behind Mohammad Abdul Wahhab's eighteenth century Salafi movement, actually became the original founder of modern violent extremism.
The result is that today while a theology of violence, evolved over centuries, is being spread with all the impact that an investment of tens of billions of dollars can ensure, there is no parallel, comprehensive, coherent theology of peace and pluralism available to oppose it. This is because the so-called moderate theologians too swear by essentially the same core beliefs. For instance, the main basis of the theology of violence is contextual verses of Quran that appear to be militant and xenophobic and some narrations of Hadith concerning the wars waged during the Prophet's time, even though these were collected hundreds of years after the Prophet's demise.  But no alim is prepared to say in clear terms that these militant, contextual verses of Quran and narrations of hadith do not apply to Muslims today. Indeed, they all swear even by the divinity of Shariah, though it was first codified 120 years after God declared in Surah 5 verse 3 that the religion of Islam had been completed.
Let me give you a concrete example. Among the Indian ulema, the most important campaigner for moderate, peaceful Islam is Maulana Wahiduddin Khan. As a commentator on the Islamic website New Age Islam pointed out, in his book, “Islam – creator of the modern world," the Maulana says (on p.17-18), “It was God’s decree that he ( Prophet Muhammad) be a da’i (missionary) as well as ma’hi (eradicator). He was entrusted by God with the mission of not only proclaiming to the world that superstitious beliefs were based on falsehood, but also of resorting to military action, if the need arose, to eliminate that system for all time.” Then he goes on to buttress his view with a  verse from the Holy Quran which in my view does not  in any way support his conclusion. Then he quotes a Hadith, which he considers akin to revelation. He says: "One hadith in particular is quite direct in its wording, 'I am the eradicator through whom God will obliterate unbelief.' Thus the prophet was not just a dai, but also a mahi. He was the caller to the faith but he had also to compel people to answer his call. The Quran clearly states that besides human beings God's angels would also help him in accomplishing his mission." 
If this is the position of a moderate Indian Muslim cleric, justly renowned for his tireless efforts at building peace and pluralism, what is stopping Jihadis from saying that since that false system still exists, it is the duty of the Muslim Ummah to pursue Prophet Muhammad's unfinished mission and use military means to enforce what they consider to be the only correct system. Why should they not claim that God's angels are also with them, supporting their cause, as they were with the Prophet, since they are only carrying forward the Prophet's unfinished mission of eradicating superstition, idolatry, unbelief?  It is such erroneous interpretations of Quran and misplaced faith in concocted ahadith, that have justified throughout Islamic history, episodes of compulsion and coercion, leading to violence, starting from the ridda (apostasy) wars, immediately after the demise of the Prophet (pbuh), led by the first caliph Hazrat Abu Bakr (r.a), to the present-day violence and mayhem caused by Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda, the Deobandi madrasa products called the Taliban, the Wahhabi-Salafi Boko Haram and the so-called Islamic State led by self-declared Khalifa Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, etc.
The response of moderate Muslim scholars, the ulema, representing the global Muslim community is no different. As many as 120 ulema from around the world belonging to most schools of thought sent an Open Letter to self-declared Khalifa Al-Baghdadi’, of the ‘Islamic State’ in August 2015. Written in over 14, 000 words, this is a valuable document. It shows what is wrong with self-styled Khalifa Baghdadi's rulings. But, more importantly, it also shows what is wrong with moderate Islam at the present juncture; why this refutation will not work, why other such refutations do not work; and why our children will keep running away to ISIS and other terror centres. In fact, read between the lines, this moderate fatwa does not leave any leg for moderate Islam to stand on. In one place it says:
"... everything in the Qur’an is the Truth, and everything in authentic Hadith is Divinely inspired."
This is confirmation from moderate ulema that what terrorist ideologues have been telling their pupils is correct. This is precisely the Jihadi argument. No difference between Quran and Hadees; they are both divinely inspired. All immutable, universal, eternal guidance for all time to come. Similarly on many other issues moderate ulema from around the world show their ideological compatibility with the terrorist ideologues.
The same thread runs through the entire 14,000 word-fatwa. The moderate fatwa puts into question whether even the well-known Qur'anic verse (La Ikraha fid Deen: There is no compulsion in religion) has been abrogated. It accepts the basic premise of terrorist ideologues that peaceful Meccan verses revealed in Mecca have been abrogated, and it is the militant verses relating to war that should now prevail. 
In point 16 of the Open Letter. moderate ulema accept that "Hudud punishments (codified in Sharia) are fixed in the Qur’an and Hadith and are unquestionably obligatory in Islamic Law." Having accepted the basic premise of the Baghdadi tribe it goes on to criticise its cruel implementation in the so-called Islamic State. But once the ulema have accepted the basic premise of  Hudud (Punishment) based on 7th century Bedouin tribal Arab mores being "unquestionably obligatory in Islamic Law" what difference does actually remain between moderation and extremism. Then in point 20, moderate ulema seem to be justifying the destruction of idols and are merely critical of destruction of "the graves of Prophets or Companions," of Prophet Mohammad.
 In point 22 of the Open Letter, titled, The Caliphate, the moderate ulema again concur with the basic proposition of the Baghdadi clique: "There is agreement (Ittifaq) among scholars that a caliphate is an obligation upon the Ummah. The Ummah has lacked a caliphate since 1924 CE." Then it goes on to criticise Bghdadi for  lack of consensus from Muslims, etc. and accusing him of sedition, fitna, etc in fairly strong language. But the problem is the same. Moderate ulema agree with Baghdadi on the basic premise of the so-called obligation of the umma to have a Caliphate. This is absurd in this day and age. Clearly both Baghdadi group and moderate ulema are equally outdated, seemingly continuing to live in the 7th century CE. 
Many of us have been placing great hope in the ability of Sufi institutions to take us out of this quagmire of Islamism and growing radicalisation. But there has been a deep Wahhabisation of Indian Sufism too. Most Sufi shrines across the country are now practising gender segregation and discrimination. They have started issuing fatwas of apostasy against musicians like A R Rahman. Sufi literature has been gradually removed from Sufi madrasas and even replaced by literary books of Syed Qutb, the father of modern terrorism in the Middle East. They no longer teach books by Rumi, Ibn ul Arabi, Shaikh Saadi, Khwaja Muinuddin Chishti, Baba Fareed, Ameer Khusro, etc. Even Sufism's basic spiritual philosophy, Wahdatul Wujood (unity of existence, advaita), has been practically replaced by Wahdatul Shuhud (unity of appearance, apparentism), to make it acceptable in the present Salafi-Wahhabi milieu and to distinguish Islam from Advaita Vedanta.
The concept of Islam as a spiritual path is clearly giving way in India to the totalitarianism of political Islam.
How can we retrieve the situation and maintain peace and social harmony? The first requirement in my view is to evolve a theology of peace and pluralism, rationality and modernity, on the basis of values that are now considered universal and which Muslim-majority countries have already accepted by signing The UN Charter and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Muslims do have the resources to evolve this theology, both in terms of classical literature and contemporary scholarship. All that needs to be done is to mobilise these resources in a systematic, organised manner.
While the evolution of this comprehensive and coherent theology of peace and pluralism will remain a continuing process, the already available essential elements of this theology should be brought to the Muslim masses. Since support for such a venture cannot be expected from clerics, of any hue,  popular acceptance of this theology should be gained through the use of media as well as genuine grassroots movements.
Essentially, Jihadism is a Muslim problem and Muslims must tackle it. But the societies in non-Muslim majority countries can help kick-start the debate.  It must be understood that a madrasa graduate who has been brainwashed into believing, as most are, that "life begins in the grave," is a ticking time bomb that should be defused with the same urgency as other bombs are. A secular government should not allow anyone to spread the poison of intolerance and xenophobia either in mosques or in madrasas. A study of what is taught in Indian madrasas, and the content of sermons delivered in mosques, is urgently required. If found intolerant, supremacist, exclusivist and xenophobic, the ulema, madrasas and imams should be confronted with them and asked to change.
Also, the least the government of India can do to ameliorate the plight of Muslim women today is to promulgate a law similar to Pakistan's  Muslim Family Laws Ordinance of 1961, with just one difference, fixing the age of marriage of girls at 18, instead of 14, as in the Ordinance. This should have been done along with reforms in Hindu personal laws in the 1950s, or at least immediately after reforms in Muslim laws in Pakistan. But better half a century late than never. Male chauvinist Indian Muslim ulema will still howl in protest. But they will not have much to say as these reforms have been acceptable to their counterparts in Pakistan and Bangladesh for over half a century. Even President General Zia's Nizam-e-Mustafa accepted these reforms. Reforms that bring Indian Muslim Personal law akin to Muslim personal laws in neighbouring Pakistan and Bangladesh will bring a lot of solace to Muslim women and sensible Muslim men. Moreover, this will breach the stagnation in Islamic theological discourse. Muslims have to start reclaiming the Islam that the Prophet had brought and rethinking how it can be lived and practised in the vastly changed circumstances of the 21st century.
[An abridged version of this essay was presented at India Ideas Conclave organised by India Foundation at Goa (Nov. 15--17, 2015)