Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Lessons from My Recent Trip to the USA: The Importance of Dawah



By Maulana Wahiduddin Khan for New Age Islam
5 October 2015
Recently, members of the Centre for Peace and Spirituality, including myself, went on a two-week trip to the USA. We left New Delhi on 26th August 2015 and returned on 9th September. The trip was at the invitation of one of the largest Islamic organizations in the USA, the Islamic Society of North American (ISNA). They were holding their convention in Chicago, to which we were invited. Besides Chicago, we also visited Washington DC, Pennsylvania, and New York.
During this trip, with God’s grace, I got to speak at different venues and to meet many people from different walks of life and backgrounds. At the ISNA convention, there was one point in particular that I stressed: that today we are living in the ‘Age of Peace’. The Age of Peace is the title of my latest book, which was released during this trip at the ISNA convention as well as at the United States Institute of Peace, a centre set up by the US Congress in order to promote peaceful methods of conflict-resolution.
There is a Hadith, full of wisdom, that I cited in relation to this Age of Peace that we are living in today. The Prophet is reported to have said: Ala al-aqil an Yakunabasiram Bi Zamanihi. (Ibn Hibban). From this Hadith we learn that wise is he who understands the age in which he lives.
This Hadith reflects the importance of something that is really crucial—the need for wise planning. Only if you properly understand and appreciate the conditions of your times can you engage in wise planning. Planning is about availing the opportunities afforded by the age in which you live. If you have no idea about the conditions of your times, you cannot avail the opportunities that they make available.
In my address at the ISNA convention, I stressed that one special characteristic of our contemporary age is freedom—total freedom. Before this, the world never enjoyed total freedom. One major reason for this was because much of the world was then under monarchical rule, when only the monarch enjoyed total freedom while everyone else was his subjects. But today we live in a very different age, an age of democracy, an age where it has been accepted that each individual has the undeniable right to be free. There was no such freedom in the past. When the Prophet was in Makkah, the early Muslims were prevented from praying at the Ka’abah. Today, in contrast, there is no such restriction on people praying. You—Muslims and everyone else—can pray anywhere in the world you like and no one is going to stop you. Isn’t that amazing! The Prophet and his companions had to face opposition when they wanted to worship at the Ka’abah, and today Muslims are free to build mosques in every country and worship there, without any problem. This is freedom, the freedom that we now enjoy in this new age.
If, in line with the message of the Hadith referred to above, you want to understand today’s age, you must keep in mind that one basic feature of this age is freedom.
And what is freedom?
Basically, it is the freedom to avail or make use of available opportunities. This age is an age of an explosion of opportunities. There is a great abundance of opportunities available all around us today.
On the one hand, this age has given us many freedoms. On the other hand, it has also given us immense opportunities. Wise planning means recognizing these many opportunities—opportunities in various fields, including in business, social work, education and Dawah or inviting people to God—and then using the freedom we have been blessed with to properly avail of these opportunities. There is no restriction on your doing any of this, except for one thing: you must not harm or trouble anyone else. As long as you refrain yourself from harming others, no one will stop you from using your freedom to avail of the many opportunities that abound today.
Let me cite a story to illustrate this point. When America won independence from Britain, an American man, overjoyed at the news, stepped out of his home and into the streets to celebrate. In his joy, he waved his hands about, and by mistake, struck a passerby on the nose. The angry passerby asked him why he had hit him. The man said to him, “We’ve won freedom, and I’m now free! I was exercising my freedom!” The second man replied, “Yes, you are free, but your freedom ends where my nose begins!”
In my address, I related this story and talked of 9/11, the destruction of the twin towers in New York. This crime was like hitting the ‘industrial nose’ of America, I said—and this is totally unacceptable. One cannot avail of existing opportunities if one misuses one’s freedom in order to hurt, damage and kill others. You will have to save yourself from hitting other people’s ‘noses’ if you are to be eligible to enjoy the freedoms and avail of the many opportunities that today’s age has opened up. You will have to refrain from violence, from suicide-bombing, from the gun-culture and the bomb-culture. Only by avoiding hurting and harming others can you progress. This is another point that I stressed in my address.
ISNA, I said, is working in a peaceful way. It is a huge organization. They are doing a lot of work, especially in the field of social service. I said that ISNA has established a ‘social empire’, as it were, in America. And why and how has it been able to do so? It was because it was not hitting anyone else’s ‘nose’. It was not engaged in violence. That is how it has been able to do so much in the field of social service. This reflects wisdom, the wisdom referred to in the Hadith that I referred to earlier—the need to understand the age in which one lives and the demands of that age.
The audience really appreciated this point. There were some 10,000 people in the audience, and we distributed peace-related literature among them, including my latest books, The Age of Peace and Quranic Wisdom.
Near the Chicago airport, a group of Muslims of Turkish background have established a very large institution—the Turkish-American Society (TAS). This centre is associated with the movement led by the well-known Turkish Muslim scholar, Ustad Fethullah Gulen. We visited the centre—and this was, again, a great experience. In my interaction with the people associated with the centre, I said it was so remarkable how the movement led by Ustad Gulen had spawned an ‘educational empire’—in the form of hundreds of high-standard schools across the world, in more than a hundred countries! I also remarked that the Turks had established the Ottoman Caliphate that lasted for a long time but then conditions in the wake of the First World War led to its collapse. People wrongly think that the Turkish nationalist leader Mustafa Kemal Ataturk single-handedly destroyed it. But I have studied the issue and I believe that the Ottoman Caliphate wasn’t put an end to by the actions of any single individual. Rather, it was the demand of the times, the requirement of the age that this should happen.
How and why do I say this?
It is because by the early 20th century, the age of political empires across the world was fast coming to an end. By this time, no longer was it possible to establish political empires. Before this, this had indeed been possible—and that’s how there was the British empire, the Mughal Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Roman Empire, and so on. But now the times had changed and this was no longer possible. This possibility was ended for good. And so, in accordance with the changing conditions and demands of the times, Ustad Gulen had very rightly focused his attention on non-political work—on promoting education. He caught hold of the root, as it were, education being an issue of the utmost importance. He helped set up a big number of good schools in many countries. Interestingly, he did not talk about establishing universities. Nothing happens through universities unless the schools that feed the universities are good. You need proper schools, schools that provide proper education and moral training. And that’s what Ustad Gülen put so much stress on.
When I reflect on the issue of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk’s declaration of the abolition of the Ottoman Caliphate, I realize that this was not an announcement of and by a single individual. Rather, it was the voice of the new age speaking—which Mustafa Kemal articulated—telling us that the age of political empires had now passed for good. And a logical culmination of what this voice had announced culminated in the efforts of another Turk—Ustad Gülen—in his remarkable work in the educational field.
Something remarkable had happened in the early 20th century—the end of the age when political empires used to be established in the world. Mustafa Kemal announced the first part of this momentous news, and then Ustad Gülen announced the second part of it through his educational work. Ustad Gülen has shown that even though the age when political empires used to be established has now passed, opportunities to progress still remain—in the non-political sphere. In fact, today we have many more such opportunities than before! If earlier people tried to establish political empires, often at a very heavy cost, today you can establish non-political ‘empires’. And for non-political ‘empires’, the sky, as they say, is the limit! You can establish them all over the world! You don’t need any army or war for that.
How truly amazing it is that the Turks had established a vast political empire which came to an end in the early 20th century and then how a group of Turks set about establishing a non-political educational ‘empire’! God selected them to tell the world not to lament the passing of an age, but, instead, to recognize the new opportunities afforded by the new age and to work accordingly.
So, in America today, the ISNA has established a ‘social service empire’ and the movement led by Ustad Gülen an ‘educational empire’—all using peaceful means. And, I told people I met in America, we at the Centre for Peace and Spirituality are trying to establish a ‘Dawah empire’, seeking to call people all across the world to God. Given the immense opportunities that the modern age has made available, a ‘Dawah empire’ is entirely possible today.
Muslims must reflect deeply on the Hadith referred to above. They must seek to understand its contemporary relevance and its deep wisdom. From this Hadith I understand that although the times or the age may change, opportunities never cease. If one age passes away, you must not think that all is lost. Instead, you must seek to understand the conditions and demands of the new age discover the opportunities that it affords and, accordingly, work in a new way.
Today, we live in a new world, a world characterized by freedom and many opportunities. We are truly blessed with the freedom to work in a vast range of spheres. Today, we are free to establish a ‘social service empire’, an ‘educational empire’, a ‘Dawah empire’, and so on, all in the non-political fields. If you truly understand and appreciate the importance of this point, you will not fall prey to despair. You will not waste your time in protest and complaint. You will not resort to violence. You will not destroy yourself and others in suicide-bombing, the gun-culture and the bomb-culture. You will realize how meaningless and ridiculous all of this is because today opportunities to progress are available in great abundance, greater than ever before, and you also have the freedom to avail of them. In my interactions in America, I repeatedly stressed this point.
Just this morning, I thought to myself, “On our trip to America, my friends and I travelled more than 30,000 kilometres in just 15 days, doing Dawah work!” This is such a great blessing, isn’t it? Earlier, this was simply unthinkable—going to so many places, so far away, and in such a short time! It is this that is what I call a ‘Dawah empire’. A ‘Dawah empire’ is not based in some fort or castle. There’s no role at all for a fort, for a gun, for war, in a Dawah empire. The role is that of peaceful effort. On our trip, we met with many people—Christians, Muslims, Hindus and others—and we talked about Dawah with them. We engaged in Dawah with them. And in this we faced absolutely no obstructions at all. I was so touched! Here I was, an Indian, coming to America all the way from India and engaging in Dawah there, inviting people to God and not a single person stopped me! How amazing, isn’t it? Compare this with the times of the Prophet Muhammad and other prophets. The prophets had to face stiff opposition to their Dawah work. But now, in our age, one can engage in Dawah without any obstruction whatsoever—the only condition being that you should have no hate, no complaint, in your heart against anyone. The origin of every evil is complaint. Complaint leads to hate; hate leads to enmity; and enmity leads to violence, to war, to suicide-bombing, to the gun-culture and the bomb-culture. And the result of all of this is nothing but destruction—nothing positive at all.
The Quran is the basis of our mission. We have published translations of the Quran in several languages. We have also brought out other literature—supportive literature—to help people understand how to apply the Quran, which was revealed in the seventh century, to our contemporary times. The book that we have recently come out with, The Age of Peace, must be made available to many more people. We must disseminate this literature as widely as possible. Learning through reading is a Quranic principle.
In the Quran, God says: ‘Read! Your Lord is the Most Bountiful One who taught by the pen’ (96:3-4). In earlier times, this was possible only in a limited way. People used to write out texts by hand, and that took much time and effort. When I was studying in the madrasa, I once copied out an Arabic course book by hand! But today, in our age of the printing press and the Internet, you can produce and disseminate books at the touch of a button, and on a massive scale. This is one of the many blessings of God that have appeared in this age. Another such blessing is that no matter what your background or educational qualifications, you can devote yourself fully to Dawah work. This is such a mobile age! People are constantly moving about today. You interact with many people every day. You can keep Dawah-related literature with you and distribute it to people you meet. That’s an easy way to do Dawah work. We should be grateful that God has blessed us with so many opportunities to do this work in this age.
Wherever I travel—and this happened in America on our recent trip as well—I meet people who are searching for a message that addresses their minds. A message that addresses their innate nature. A message of spirituality. A message that has nothing to do with political wrangling and conflict. A message free of hate. Everyone seems to be searching for this. But only God can satisfy this inner thirst. And that indicates the importance of Dawah, of inviting people to God.
The 20th century was an age of ‘social movements’, among Muslims and others too. There was an explosion of such movements all across the world. But all of them somewhere got stuck in politics. And where politics appears, protest, complaint and hate inevitably raise their ugly heads. These things are not innate in human beings as created by God. Rather, they are fomented by ambitious, power-hungry leaders.
Today, people are thirsty for peace, for spirituality, for positivity. An entire century went off, full of political talk, of hate talk. But today, in the 21st century, people want all this to be dumped—all talk of politics, of hate, of violence. They are looking for what their innate nature wants. I see this wherever I go. If the 20th century was an age of hate, of politics and of confrontation, our age is—or can be—truly ‘The Age of Peace’.

Reform In Islam: Is It Possible?



By Gökhan Bacik
October 04, 2015
The current desperate situation in the Muslim world renders the famous question a new urgency: Does the Islam of today need reforming?
Indeed, the idea of reform arose in the history of Christianity. The call for reform in Islam is inspired by Christian history: It was the Reformation that caused the leap in development there.
Mehdi Hasan, in a recent opinion published in the Guardian, argues against reforming Islam. To him, “Islam isn't Christianity. They are not analogous, and it is deeply ignorant to pretend otherwise.” Some others share Hasan's view. Their main tenet is that Islam and Christianity are different, so what happened in Christianity cannot be proposed for Islam. This perspective is institutional, and focused strictly on the differences between Islam and Christianity.
For others still, the call for reform in Islam is doctrinally alogical. As Ayan Hirsi Ali says, “Muslims are not likely to heed a call for doctrinal reformation from someone they regard as an apostate and infidel.” The traditional and conservative scholars have already declared wrongheaded those who call for reform in Islam.
This debate reduces to a linguistic one, at some point. Though “reform” is rejected, the Islamic tradition itself has its own words, such as ihya (revival) and tajdid (renewal). So reformists can shelter under these words to avoid censure from the radicals. The term tajdid has a particularly strong religious legitimacy.
The words “revival” and “renewal” give us the main divisions in the Muslim world of today. The revivalists believe that Islamic doctrine is perfect but that problems stem simply from the fact that we do not have perfect Muslims who obey its rules. The renewal school, in direct contrast, argues that religious doctrine itself should be updated, and even corrected.
There are two points that we should consider when we analyze the revivalist and the renewal schools. First, the dynamism of Islamic thought has been stagnant for ages. It is very obvious that religious doctrine has never been updated according to the parallel scientific and other developments. Thus, the argument that “Islamic doctrine is perfect” is tautological, on the logical model of the analytical (as distinct from synthetic) statement: “Islamic doctrine” entails “is perfect.” The counter-argument this attracts is that Islamic doctrine is outdated, and that compromises its “perfect” entailment, and ipso facto destroys this putative analytical statement's truth value.
Second, the rise of religious piety has failed to overcome major problems in Muslim societies. This is a major argument of the renewal school. The revival school has argued that the greater the number of pious Muslims, the fewer the problems of Muslim communities. But things have gone in the opposite direction, for we are seeing religious actors and political groups in the Muslim world, from Malaysia to Turkey, promoting anti-piety examples such as corruption and terrorism.
For instance, in a certain sense, the members of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) are very pious, as are many corrupt leaders of the Muslim world. That destroys the main argument of revivalism. Worse, religious people have instrumentalized Islam to make it the tool that helps their political strategies.
The debate should be brought to a simple thought: What does Islam offer the US in terms of space technology? What does Islam offer Norway in terms of urbanization? What does Islam offer women who live in Sydney in terms of civil and democratic rights? What does Islam offer the world environmental movement? What does Islam offer Danish society in terms of work ethics?
The Islamic dawa (cause) that was shaped in the 19th century was practice oriented. Its purpose was to raise a religious generation. (“Religious” here connotes “practical religiosity.”) It was believed that Islamic doctrine is perfect, and the only deficiency is in the scarcity of religious people: so study this doctrine! But in the 21st century, it is clear that the doctrine itself needs renewal. The religious generation of Muslims has failed to solve problems such as corruption and impeded democratization.
Source: todayszaman.com/columnist/gokhan-bacik/reform-in-islam-is-it-possible_400564.html

FATA: Fatal Flaws

By Ambreen Agha
October 5, 2015
On September 11, 2015, two volunteers of a 'peace committee' [Government-backed 'people's' counter-insurgency forces] , identified as Nawab Khan and Fazal Khan, were killed in an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) attack while they were travelling from Pandyali tehsil (revenue unit) of Mohmand Agency to Dwezai area of the same Agency in Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA).
Earlier, on September 8, 2015, at least six pro-Government peace volunteers of Tauheed-ul Islam (TI), belonging to the Zakakhel tribe, were killed by Lashkar-e-Islam (LI) terrorists in the Bara tehsil of Khyber Agency. An unnamed 'spokesman' of LI claimed that the volunteers were helping the Security Forces (SFs) against them.
On September 7, 2015, another five peace volunteers of TI were executed in the Qambarkhel area of Khyber Agency. LI 'spokesman' Salahuddin Ayubi called from an undisclosed location and claimed that his men had killed the five pro-government fighters. These 11 'peace volunteers' of TI were abducted by LI from the Sanda Pal area while they were going to the Maidan area in the Tirah Valley of the Khyber Agency on September 6, 2015.
Again, on September 7, 2015, a pro-government tribal elder, identified as Mullah Amanullah, was shot dead by unidentified armed assailants in a targeted attack in the Chaharmang area of Nawagai in the Bajaur Agency.
On September 1, 2015, at least six persons, including one Khasadar (tribal Police Force) official, were killed and 56 were injured in a suicide attack in the Jamrud tehsil of Bajaur Agency. The Political Agent of the Bajaur Agency, Shahab Ali Shah, disclosed that the suicide bomber was aiming to enter his office but failed to do so because of strict security measures, and consequently blew himself up at the entrance gate. Salahuddin Ayubi, 'spokesman' for the LI, first claimed responsibility for the attack declaring that their targets were Government officials. Later, Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) 'spokesman' Mohammad Khorasani claimed that the TTP's 'special martyrdom unit' carried out the suicide attack, with the aim to kill Government officials tasked with implementing the Government's National Action Plan (NAP). Notably, the 20-point NAP came as a counter-terrorism measure under the Constitution (Twenty-First Amendment) Act, 2015, on December 24, 2014, after the gruesome December 16, 2015, Peshawar Army Public School massacre which had resulted in 147 fatalities, including 134 school children.
According to partial data compiled by the South Asia Terrorism Portal (SATP), FATA has already recorded 1,678 fatalities in 2015, (all data till October 4), including 98 civilians, 90 SF personnel and 1,490 terrorists. 741 of these fatalities have been recorded in NWA (four civilians, 27 SF personnel and 710 terrorists); 587 from the Khyber Agency (38 civilians, 17 SF personnel and 532 terrorists); 152 from the South Waziristan Agency (SWA, 28 civilians, 17 SF personnel and 107 terrorists); 70 from the Kurram Agency (two civilians, 12 SF personnel and 56 terrorists); 60 from the Orakzai Agency (four civilians, nine SF personnel and 47 terrorists); 34 from the Mohmand Agency (six civilians, one SF and 27 terrorists); 28 from the Bajaur Agency (15 civilians, six SF personnel and seven terrorists). Frontier Region (FR) Bannu recorded a total of five fatalities, including one SF trooper and four terrorists; followed by FR Peshawar with one terrorist killed. The other four FRs did not record any fatality. [FATA comprises of seven Agencies - Bajaur, Khyber, Kurram, Mohmand, North Waziristan, Orakzai, South Waziristan; and six FRs - FR Peshawar, FR Kohat, FR Bannu, FR Lakki, FR Tank and FR Dera Ismail (DI) Khan] .
According to partial data compiled by the Institute for Conflict Management (ICM) a total of 27,833 persons, including 3,769 civilians, 2,226 SF personnel and 21,838 terrorists, have been killed in FATA since 2002 (all data till October 4, 2015). All seven Agencies have witnessed extensive and prolonged violence. Of these, NWA remains the worst hit, recording at least 6,626 fatalities over this period, including 651 civilians, 661 SF personnel and 5,314 terrorists; followed by the Orakzai Agency with at least 5,073 fatalities, including 259 civilians, 198 SF personnel and 4,616 terrorists; and Khyber Agency with 4,795 persons killed, including 1,017 civilians, 317 SFs and 3,461 terrorists [these are likely to be significant underestimates, as media and independent access to the regions of conflict is severely restricted. Categorization of fatalities is also without independent verification].
The Khyber Agency ranks first on civilian deaths, recording a total of 1,017; followed by NWA, 651; Kurram, 538; Bajaur, 463; Mohmand, 455; SWA, 376; and Orakzai, 259.
On SF fatalities, NWA tops the list, recording at least 661 deaths; followed by SWA, 472; Khyber, 317; Mohmand, 244; Orakzai, 198; Bajaur, 177; and Kurram, 105.
On terrorist fatalities, NWA ranks first, recording at least of 5,314 deaths; Orakzai, 4,616; Khyber, 3,461; SWA, 3,127; Bajaur, 2,619; Kurram, 1,465; and Mohmand Agency 1,211.
Terrorist fatalities at 21,838 of a total of 27,833 deaths, account for a staggering 78.46 per cent of total fatalities, suggesting indiscriminate operations that rely overwhelmingly on area weapons - artillery, drones and missiles, rather than face to face engagements between ground forces and the terrorists. A multiplicity of military operations have targeted FATA in the past, prominently including Operation Sirat-e-Mustaqeem (Khyber Agency in FATA; June 28, 2008-July 9, 2008); Operation Sherdil (Bajaur Agency in FATA; August 7, 2008- February 28, 2009); Operation Rah-e-Nijat (South Waziristan Agency in FATA; June 19, 2009-December 12, 2009); Operation Khwakh Ba De Sham (Orakzai and Kurram Agencies in FATA; March 23, 2010-June 1, 2010); Operation Brekhna (Mohmand Agency in FATA; November 3, 2009); and Operation Koh-i-Sufaid (Kurram Agency in FATA; July 2, 2011 - August 18, 2011). These are just some additional campaigns in a long series targeting renegade domestic terrorist formations, that was launched after the Lal Masjid debacle of 2007.
Meanwhile, an operation is still underway in NWA. The Pakistan military had launched an 'all out offensive', codenamed Operation Zarb-e-Azb [Sword of the Prophet] in NWA on June 15, 2014, in the aftermath of the attack on the Jinnah International Airport, Karachi, on June 8-9, 2014, in which at least 33 persons, including all 10 attackers, were killed. According to SATP data, thus far 2,039 terrorists and 227 soldiers have been killed in this ongoing operation. A day before the completion of one year of Operation Zarb-e-Azb, Major General Asim Saleem Bajwa, Director General (DG) of the Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR), on June 14, 2015, claimed, "The operation has moved to last few pockets close to Pakistan-Afghanistan border and so far, 2,763 terrorists have been killed. 347 soldiers and officers have also been killed since the start of the operation on June 15, 2014."
Operation Zarb-e-Azb, however, narrowly targets domestic terrorists, principally of the Tehrik-e-Taliban and its various constituent and splinter formations, even as it assiduously avoids any conflict with the Pakistan-backed groups operating in Afghanistan. Significantly, on the sidelines of the United Nations (UN) General Assembly session in New York on September 28, 2015, US Secretary of State John Kerry urged Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to take "additional action" against terrorist groups such as the Haqqani Network that operate in Afghanistan and maintain safe havens in NWA. Despite repeated appeals to this effect from the US, Afghanistan and other countries that were part of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), Pakistan continues to provide fullest support to the terrorist formations operating in Afghanistan.
In the Khyber Agency, Operation Khyber-II was launched on March 23, 2015 and ended on June 15, 2015, after inflicting a total of 227 fatalities, including 218 terrorists, two civilians and seven SF personnel. Operation Khyber-II was preceded by Operation Khyber-I, launched on October 16, 2014, and that ended on March 17, 2015, with a total of 717 persons, including 50 civilians, 19 SF personnel and 648 terrorists, killed. Despite these two long operations, terrorists continue to operate freely in Khyber, as is evident from the spate of recent incidents (above). Once again, this raises questions about the credibility and efficacy of such operations.
FATA has been described as the epicenter of World Terrorism, and has provided safe haven to at least 40 prominent terrorist outfits, the largest number of which are based in NWA, followed by SWA. There are a total of 18 terrorist outfits based in NWA, including the most lethal and deadly Haqqani Network that has been a major threat to United States (US), NATO and Afghan National Security Force (ANSF) troops in Afghanistan.
Among the groups operating from the tribal areas are a number of foreign terrorist formations, including the Afghan Taliban, Uzbek terrorists, the Uighurs and East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM). The witches' brew is compounded by various country chapters of al Qaeda, including the Tunisian, Turkish and Jordanian. However, Pakistan President Mamnoon Hussain, during a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on September 2, 2015, had claimed that all Uighur terrorist groups and terrorists belonging to the East Turkestan Islamic Movemeng (ETIM) had been eliminated from the country and, further, that the ongoing anti-terror Operation Zarb-e-Azb "has been successful in eradicating terrorism from our country. It has also been very helpful in eliminating the ETIM element from our country."
Pakistan has made such claims after each cycle of operations, and these have been belied by subsequent actions by terrorists. The obvious and persistent contradiction between orchestrating Islamist terrorist campaigns against its neighbours and seeking to suppress domestic Islamist terrorism remains impossible to reconcile. Indeed, most domestic terrorist formations in Pakistan have intimate linkages with Pakistan state-backed terrorist formation operating in Afghanistan, even as many of the externally directed sarkari (officially backed) jihadi groups, prominently including outfits such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), maintain linkages with the TTP and al Qaeda. It is useful to recall that al Qaeda has declared the Pakistani state and Army murtad (apostate) and a rightful target of jihad.
Pakistan continues to fight desperately to establish the writ of the state in FATA, the most disenfranchised region of the country, but terrorist groups continue to thrive, profiting from the state's ambivalence towards the instrumentalization of Islamist extremism and terrorism and their harnessing to the state's strategies in the neighbourhood. With no indication that Islamabad is willing to abandon this enduring strategy, a lasting peace in FATA remains evasive, despite persisting military operations.
Ambreen Agha is a Research Assistant, Institute for Conflict Management
Source: South Asia Intelligenc eReview

What Is Wrong With 120 Moderate Ulema's 'Open Letter to 'Khalifa' Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi? ما هو الخطأ مع الرسالة المفتوحة إلى البغدادي ولماذا لا تنجح؟ هذه الفتوى المعتدلة لا تترك أي ساق يقف عليها الإسلام المعتدل




سلطان شاهين، رئيس التحرير لنيو إيج إسلام
(ترجمه من الإنجلزية: نيو إيج إسلام)
05 أكتوبر عام 2015
 وحاليا ما لا يقل عن 120 عالم من علماء الدين الإسلامي من جميع أنحاء العالم أرسلوا رسالة مفتوحة إلى ما يسمى الخليفة "أبو بكر البغدادي".
وهذه الرسالة كانت في أكثر من 14000 كلمة. هذه الفتوى تدين البغدادي وأعماله الوحشية. ولكن، الأهم من ذلك، فإن هذه الرسالة المفتوحة تظهر أيضا ما هو الخطأ مع المسلمين المعتدلين في الظرف الحالي. لماذا لا تعمل النصائح المعتدلة وولماذا يهرب أطفالنا إلى داعش ومراكز إرهابية أخرى. في الواقع، هذه الفتوى المعتدلة لا تترك أي ساق ليقف الإسلام المعتدل عليها. إنها تتحدث عن الأشياء التي يمكن أن يستولى عليها المدافعون من الأيديولوجيات العنيفة فيستخدموها لزيادة تبرير لاهوتها. على سبيل المثال:
"وسبب هذا هو أن جميع ما جاء في القرآن حق وكل ما جاء في الحديث الصحيح وحي..."
هذا ما اتفق عليه علماء الاعتدال أن المنظرين الإرهابيين يتم تبريرهم في استخدام الآيات السياقية والآراء المتطرفة في الحديث المنسوب إلى النبي (صلى الله عليه وسلم) كأدوات تجارتهم الإرهابية. بعد كل شيء، فإنه بالضبط حجتهم. لا فرق بين القرآن والحديث، كل منهما وحي من الله تعالى. آية القرآن الكريم جيدة مثل الأخرى. وحديث النبي عليه السلام جيد مثل الحديث الآخر. كل منهما غير قابل للتغيير فعالمي وتوجيه أبدي لجميع الوقت في المستقبل.
كما في الفصل الثالث عشر من الرسالة المفتوحة - الإكراه – تقول الفتوى المعتدلة: "من المعلوم أن آية "لا إكراه في الدين" نزلت بعد فتح مكة ، فلا يستطيع أحد أن يقول بأنها منسوخة". ثم تدين الفتوى البغدادي لاستخدام الإكراه. ولكن الشيء المهم هو أنه حتى الفتوى المعتدلة قد وافقت على الفكرة الأساسية للبغدادي وغيره من الإرهابيين أن الآيات المكية السلمية التي نزلت قبل فتح مكة، والتي تشكل العمود الفقري للإسلام السلمي، قد ألغيت أو، على الأقل، قد تكون منسوخة، ومن الآيات المتعلقة بالحرب التي ينبغي أن تسود الآن.
قد أخطأت الرسالة عندما قالت "الآية "لا إكراه في الدين" نزلت بعد فتح مكة ، فلا يستطيع أحد أن يقول بأنها منسوخة". ففي الحقيقة هذه الآية نزلت قبل فتح مكة في المدينة المنورة. وذالك عندما كان بعض المسلمين يريدون استعادة أبنائهم من عهدة اليهود على طردهم من المدينة وتحويلهم إلى الإسلام. فوفقا لهؤلاء العلماء المعتدلين، والذين يعرفون سبب نزول هذه الآية ، هذه الآية منسوخة. هل لدى الإسلام المعتدل أي ساق ليقف عليها؟
 كما جاء في تفسير ابن كثير "وقد ذكروا أن سبب نزول هذه الآية في قوم من الأنصار ، وإن كان حكمها عاما .  وقال ابن جرير : حدثنا ابن بشار حدثنا ابن أبي عدي عن شعبة عن أبي بشر ، عن سعيد بن جبير عن ابن عباس قال : كانت المرأة تكون مقلاتا فتجعل على نفسها إن عاش لها ولد أن تهوده ، فلما أجليت بنو النضير كان فيهم من أبناء الأنصار فقالوا : لا ندع أبناءنا فأنزل الله عز وجل : ( لا إكراه في الدين قد تبين الرشد من الغي )".
في النقطة السادسة عشر حول الحدود، قد جعلت الفتوى المعتدلة قاعدة عامة:
"الحدود واجبة في الشريعة الإسلامية لا محالة. لكن الحدود لا تطبق إلا بعد البيان، والإنذار والتحذير واستيفاء شروط الوجوب ، فلا تطبق في ظروف القسوة. فعلى سبيل المثال كان النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قد درأ  الحدود في بعض الحالات. وعمر بن الخطاب رفع الحدود في عام المجاعة كما هو مشهور". وبعد قبول الفرضية الأساسية لقبيلة البغدادي تدين عملية تنفيذها في ما يسمى الدولة الإسلامية. وتقول: " وفي كل المذاهب الشرعية للحدود إجراءات واضحة ينبغي أن تنفذ بالرحمة وشروطها تجعل تطبيقها صعبا. والحدود تدرأ بالشبهات ، أي إذا وجد أي شك فلا يطبق الحد. ولا حدود لمن له حاجة أو فاقة أو كان فقيرا معدما" وهلم جرا. ولكن عندما قبل العلماء المعتدلون الفرضية الأساسية للحدود (العقوبة) على أساس القرن السابع من الأعراف القبلية العربية البدوية كونها "واجبة في الشريعة الإسلامية لا محالة" فما الفرق يبقى في الواقع بين الاعتدال والتطرف.
وفي النقطة العشرين يبدو أن العلماء المعتدلين يبررون هدم الأصنام والأوثان. إقرأ العبارة التالية من الرسالة المفتوحة:
"أما بالنسبة لقول أبي عمر البغدادي : "نرى وجوب هدم وإزالة كل مظاهر الشرك وتحريم وسائله لما روى مسلم في صحيحه عن أبي الهياج الأسدي قال: قال لي علي بن أبي طالب رضي الله عنه (ألا أنبئك على ما بعثني عليه صلى الله عليه وسلم: ألا تدع تمثالا إلا طمسته ولا قبرا مشرفا إلا سويته))" ، فنقول : إن كان كلامكم صحيحا فهو لا يعني قبور الأنبياء والصحابة بدليل أن الصحابة أجمعوا على دفن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم في بنيان ملاصق للمسجد، وكذالك صاحبيه أبي بكر وعمر رضي الله تعالى عنهما."
والانطباع هو واضح أن العلماء المعتدلين لا يعارضون إلا تدمير "قبور الأنبياء أو الصحابة الكرام" ولا يعارضون الالتزام المفترض لتدمير وإزالة جميع مظاهر الشرك. وهذا ليس وسيلة جيدة للحفاظ على العلاقات بين الأديان في العالم المعاصر حيث تحترم جميع الدول المتحضرة الحقوق لبعضها البعض في ممارسة شعائرها الدينية بالطريقة التي يحبونها.
في النقطة ال22 من الرسالة المفتوحة بعنوان الخلافة، يتفق العلماء المعتدلون مرة أخرى مع المسألة الأساسية المتمثلة في زمرة البغدادي: "الخلافة أمر واجب على الأمة باتفاق. وقد افتقدت الأمة الخلافة بعد سقوطها عام 1924م". ثم يذهبون إلى انتقاد البغدادي لعدم وجود إجماع من المسلمين ويتهمون بالتحريض على الفتنة وغيرها في لغة قوية إلى حد ما. ولكن المشكلة تبقى حتى الآن. يتفق العلماء المعتدلون مع البغدادي على الفرضية الأساسية لما يسمى الأمر الواجب على الأمة أن تكون لها الخلافة. هذا أمر سخيف في هذا اليوم وهذا العصر. من الواضح أن مجموعة البغدادي والعلماء المعتدلين على قدم المساواة، وعلى ما يبدو أنهم يعيشون في السابع عشر للميلاد.
ولكن على قضية واحدة، يبرز البغدادي بوصفه أكثر إنسانية وتحضرا من هؤلاء العلماء المعتدلين، إذا كان ذلك ممكنا. في النقطة الثالثة والعشرين "الانتماء إلى الأوطان" تقول رسالة مفتوحة إلى البغدادي: "قلتم في خطبتكم: سوريا ليست للسوريين والعراق ليست للعراقيين (54) وفي نفس المقالة دعوتم المسلمين من جميع أنحاء العالم ليهاجروا إلى مناطق نفوذ "الدولة الإسلامية" في العراق والشام. فأنتم بهذا الإعلان أخذتم حقوق وخيرات هذه البلاد وزعمتموها على أناس غرباء ولو كانوا من نفس الدين ، تماما كما فعلت إسرائيل في طلب المستوطنين اليهود من خارج إسرائيل وأخذهم حقوق أهل فلسطين وأراضيهم وطردهم من أرضهم وأرض أجدادهم. فأين العدالة في هذا؟"
لا يصبح شيئا خاطئا فقط لأن إسرائيل تقوم بذلك. في الواقع تقوم إسرائيل بأشياء نافعة  ويتابعها المسلمون. في هذه الحالة، فإنه ليس إسرائيل فقط بل العالم المتحضر بأسره الذي يسهم "الحقوق والموارد" لبلدانه ويوزعها "بين الناس الذين غرباء لتلك الأراضي" ولكن هاجروا إما من حيث المهاجرين لأسباب اقتصادية أو طالبي اللجوء السياسي. في الواقع، حتى الطلاب يجدون تصاريح إقامة دائمة في بعض البلدان في أقل من سنتين، دون مساهمة أي شيء في الاقتصاد. ومن ناحية أخرى، في الدول العربية الوحشية، بما في ذلك أرض "الإسلام البروتستاني"، التي تسمى الآن المملكة العربية السعودية، حتى لو كنت تخدم البلاد لنصف قرن فلا يمكن أن تتوقع تحصل بقدر ما هو البطاقة الخضراء أو وضع الإقامة الدائمة وبعد ذلك، بالطبع، سوف يتم إخراجك إذا كنت عشت أكثر من حاجتهم. إذا كان البغدادي يعطي منصب الإقامة للذين يدعوهم إلى العمل أو القتال من أجله ، كان متحضرا، معتبرا بأنه هو الحاكم العربي، ولا حاكم عربي سواء كان إسلامويا أومعتدلا أو يساريا أو قوميا، يعرف بهذا النوع من السلوك المتحضر. فيدين العلماء المعتدلون البغدادي لذلك. على ما يبدو أنهم يدعمون الهمجية العربية في هذا الشأن.
هذا لا يعني أن الرسالة المفتوحة غير مجدية تماما أو بنتائج عكسية كليا. إنها لأمر جيد بقدر ما يذهب. فإنه ينتقد البغدادي وزمرته، وبشدة جدا، على الأقل، من أجل تنفيذه الخاطئ لمبادئ الشريعة الإسلامية، حتى لو كانت تتفق معه على الأساسيات في عدة مجالات. ولكن التوقع من الرسالة المفتوحة إلى وقف الدعم لما يسمى الدولة الإسلامية سيكون غير ذي جدوى.
وقد يوجد التطرف والتفوق في التاريخ الإسلامي، تقريبا من البداية. حارب المسلمون فيما بينهم وبشدة جدا حتى قبل جمع الأحاديث وبناء الشريعة التي يعتبرونها الآن إلهية. لم يجد المسلمون أي ترياق للآيات المتعلقة بالحرب والقتال في القرآن التي متوفرة الآن لأي شخص لديه إمكانية الوصول إلى الإنترنت. والاعتقاد أن جميع آيات القرآن الكريم تنطبق على المسلمين لجميع الأوقات دون الإشارة إلى سياقها لن تحل المشكلة. والاعتقاد أن الشريعة والحديث كليهما وحي لن يقدم الاجابة على الأسئلة من اليوم.
 يجب على المسلمين التخلي عن اللاهوت الذي يؤدي إلى العنف والتفوق والبحث عن لاهوت جديد، لاهوت متماسك للسلام والتعددية، بما يتفق من كافة النواحي مع التعاليم الأصلية للإسلام، ومناسبة للمجتمعات المعاصرة والمستقبلية.

Sunday, October 4, 2015

The Importance of Spiritually-Enriching Company



By Yoginder Sikand, New Age Islam
4 October 2015
I’ve just spent two beautiful days—at the “Discover Yourself” workshop conducted by Bangalore-based Sadathullah Khan.
From 2002 onwards, Sadath Sahib has been conducting his workshops across India and in more than a dozen countries abroad. Till date, he has done some 350 of them, and in this way touching the lives of several thousand people.
I’ve known Sadath Sahib for over 20 years—long before he started the “Discover Yourself” workshop. He is a man who is deeply inspired by a sense of mission. Having trained as an engineer, he worked as a businessman for a while, and then, in 1987, he set up the English monthly magazine “Islamic Voice”. At that time, it was one of the only Muslim-run periodicals in English in India. The magazine (which can be accessed online, on www.islamicvoice.com) is now in its 25th year!
I had heard about the ‘Discover Yourself’ workshop many years ago, and had come across regular reports and raving reviews about it in the pages of ‘Islamic Voice’. I had plenty of opportunities to attend the workshop all these years, being based, off and on, in Bangalore, where Sadath Sahib also lives. Yet, I never seriously considered doing so.
There were many reasons for this. For one thing, I didn’t think that I needed to do the workshop. I had read I can’t remember how many books about self-help and counselling, about psychology and the skills of managing one’s emotions, and so what new thing could I learn from a two- or three-day workshop? Surely, I thought, the many books I had read on the subject were quite sufficient for my purposes. They certainly contained more information than what one man could convey in a workshop over two or three days!
A second reason why I didn’t feel enthused about participating in the workshop was that I was sceptical of the claim, made by many workshop participants, that it could remarkably transform one’s life. How can you turn over an entirely new leaf in just two or three days, I wondered? It sounded just too good to be true! And so, I put it down as sheer exaggeration and presumed it was a publicity gimmick.
How quickly we come to conclusions based on our presumptions, even if we have absolutely no basis for them! How judgmental and self-righteous we often are!
A third excuse I made up in order not to attend the workshop was that I was just ‘too busy’ with ‘very important things’ to take the time off that the workshop demanded. It just wasn’t worth it, I told myself.
And so, for these and other reasons, each time the opportunity to participate in the workshop came my way, I turned it down.
But guess what?
Last week, I found listening with rapt attention to Sadath Sahib as he led a two-day workshop at Bangalore’s Al-Ameen College!
And guess what else?
It was one of the most beautiful and beneficial experiences I’ve ever been blessed with!
You really must believe me when I say this!
During the workshop, Sadath Sahib reminded us about many things we’ve already heard or read about but which we so easily choose to forget—about God, the Hereafter, and the purpose of our lives; about connecting with God and submitting to His will; about realizing or discovering ourselves; about how peace can be only be had by connecting with our Creator; about the need to introspect and to stop blaming others for our troubles; about accepting reality, rather than denying it; about being ourselves and accepting others just as they are, rather than judging and criticizing them; about the need to recognize that our views about things are often just opinions and that we should respect the right of others to view things differently from us; about the need to try to explore why people behave the way they do, instead of condemning them for it; about the need to move from egocentrism to genuine concern for others; about living life as God wants us to, and not as the ego urges us to; about love and compassion; about being happy and helping others be happy too; about the need to be aware, from moment to moment, of our thoughts and actions and the fact that we have a choice to respond positively, rather than react negatively, to challenging situations; about handling relationships in a harmonious way; about training oneself spiritually in such a way that we do not react to what others might do or say that might cause us to lose our peace; and about how it is oneself, not others, that must work on changing. And so on.
All this and more you might find in a whole range of books on self-help and spirituality, but based on my two days at the workshop, I can confidently say that it is an entirely different thing being in the company of a ‘coach’ (as Sadath Sahib described his role in the workshop) who has tried to put what he talks about into practice in his own life. Being in, and benefitting from, the presence of someone who seems a transformed person in many respects is a truly amazing experience. Sometimes, simply being with someone who exudes positivity and compassion can itself be a transformative experience without him or her having to utter even a single word. This importance of Suhbat or Sangat, spiritually-enriching company, is something that various spiritual traditions give great stress on. Spending those two days with Sadath Sahib were definitely inspiring.
Sadath Sahib’s dedication, drive, commitment, passion and energy, so evident throughout the workshop, were truly amazing! Even as we participants were comfortably ensconced in our chairs, he was up and on his toes and speaking almost continuously, sending out powerful, infectious positive energy, peppered with brilliant humour! It wasn’t a dry and drab affair at all. There was much laughing and joking! I never knew Sadath Sahib had such a wonderful, childlike sense of humour (How easily we judge people based on limited knowledge!).
It was clearly evident from all that Sadath Sahib said and the way he spoke that he was deeply concerned for our well-being and that he saw the workshops he has been conducting for so many years as a spiritual mission. Even at 65 years of age, he continues to travel, around India and abroad, seeking to bring people out their self-imposed misery and into God-consciousness, and helping them pick up the broken pieces of their lives, heal their emotional wounds and mend their sundered relationships. How many of us would have the drive and zeal to do this sort of thing, month after month, year after year? Even though I am almost 20 years younger than Sadath Sahib, I don’t think I have even a quarter of his enthusiasm and energy!
The ‘Discover Yourself’ workshop is based on an Islamic paradigm, and, typically, most workshop participants are Muslims. But in the workshop I attended, many of the participants were from other religious backgrounds. Even then, what Sadath Sahib spoke and the way he connected with us was such that it could readily appeal to people of other faiths too. He supplied the Sanskrit equivalent for certain Arabic terms, and his stress on the oneness of God and the way of life, of surrender to God’s will, that all the many messengers that God has sent to the world have taught, was something that people in the audience who were not Muslims might have easily appreciated and related to. 
For me, the workshop was a great blessing. I thank God for this. Those were two truly beautiful days!
May God bless Sadath Sahib for his noble efforts and lead Him to be an instrument for guiding many more people in the future!   

View from the Urdu Press: Voters And Villains


By Shaheen Nazar
September 29, 2015
Muslim vote must unite; Muslim voters must show wisdom; Bihar election will give direction to the nation; Secular parties should give a united fight; People of Bihar should support secular leaders; Is BJP going to gain from Majlis and Mulayam?
These are some of the headlines that are appearing every day in Inquilab, the Urdu daily published from 14 cities including Delhi and Patna.
Inquilab is devoting full two columns to "Aap ki Raai" (Your opinion) every day ever since Bihar election was declared. If this column is to be believed, then the general consensus among Muslims of Bihar, and the rest of India, is in support of 'secular forces' meaning the alliance between Nitish Kumar-led JD-U and Lalu Prasad-led RJD.
"The BJP is trying to woo Muslims but they are fully aware of the developments done by Nitish in Bihar. Therefore, once again we should unite and ensure the overwhelming victory of the grand coalition and defeat communal forces," says a letter writer from Bhagalpur.
Muslims of UP and Delhi are also participating in this column. They are sceptical of Mulayam's decision to withdraw from the secular alliance. "Why did Mulayam Singh Yadav exclude himself from this alliance. Does he want to strengthen the hands of NDA? If this is his thinking then it's unfortunate… In this critical situation, all the secular parties should contest Bihar election as a united force so that the rising tide of communalism could be stopped. If secular vote is divided then no one can stop the NDA from coming to power," says a reader from Maunath Bhanjan in UP. Another reader from Azamgarh is equally critical of Mulayam: "He claims to be a sympathiser of Muslims but by withdrawing from the secular alliance he has proved that his only intention is to split Muslim vote and benefit NDA."
Owaisi is one factor which is dominating Bihar election. Although the Hyderabadi leader's Majlis Ittehadul Muslemin is contesting only 28 seats in the Muslim dominated region of Seemanchal, it is getting considerable coverage in the media. Muslims, specially the young generation in the community, are looking at him with interest but they are wary of him as well. This is reflected in the Inquilab column as also in other comments appearing in Urdu newspapers.
Praising Asaduddin Owaisi as the sole voice from the Muslim community who has the guts to challenge the Modi government in Parliament, a student of Jamia Misbahul Uloom, Siddharthnagar, UP, appeals to him not to participate in Bihar election as "his good intentions for the community may go in favour of the communal forces."
Another letter writer from Sheikhpura in Bihar, without naming Owaisi, warns people against those who want to split Muslim vote. A woman from Darbhanga appeals to  her "Muslim brothers and sisters" to vote for Nitish-Lalu combine. But she also appeals to the duo not to run after Mulayam, and instead, take Owaisi in their fold.
Digvijay Singh criticised
Editor (North Region) Shakeel Shamsi has come down heavily on Congress leader Digvijay Singh for branding Owaisi as a communal leader. In his daily column on 27 Sept. 2015, he writes: "By putting partial faces of Owaisi and RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat on his Twitter account, Digvijay Singh is trying to say that Owaisi and Bhagwat are two sides of the same coin. What purpose this childish act would serve is known only to Digvijay or Congress, but we would like to tell Congress leaders that they should stop calling others communal and instead start distancing themselves from the Sangh-minded people in their own ranks.
Manish Tewari's open support to RSS on the issue of reservation is a recent example. Owaisi cannot be termed another face of RSS as the subsidiary organisations of the Sangh Parivar have openly called for his physical elimination. Congress attack on Owaisi is going to increase his popularity."
Urdu Newspapers At A Glance: Major centres of Urdu are Delhi, Lucknow, Patna and Kolkata in the North and Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bangalore in the West and South of India. In each of these centres, dozens of Urdu dailies are published. According to figures released in March 2015, there are 4,770 Urdu periodicals registered with the Registrar of Newspapers in India which is third in number after Hindi and English. But circulation wise Urdu newspapers are nowhere near Hindi, English or any of the major languages like Bengali, Malayalam, Tamil, Marathi or Gujarati.
Traditionally, Urdu newspapers have been supporting Congress. But with Congress losing relevance in the Hindi heartland, Urdu newspapers have turned to 'secular forces' while vehemently opposing 'communal forces'. Bihar election is no exception. Newspapers published from the state and beyond are giving extensive coverage to election-related news. Muslims, who constitute the main readership of Urdu newspapers, see this election as the last hope of stopping the tide of Hindutva forces. Therefore, Nitish-Lalu combine is their favourite while they are in a state of confusion over support to Asaduddin Owaisi, lest the split of 'secular' vote helps BJP. Mulayam is seen with detest.
Qaumi Awaz, which is now defunct, used to be the leading Urdu daily in Delhi, Lucknow and Patna. It has been replaced by Rashtriya Sahara and Inquilab. Other Delhi newspaper that has considerable readership is Jadeed Khabar edited by Masoom Moradabadi.
During the last decade, Inquilab and Rashtriye Sahara have emerged as dailies distributed nationally. Sahara has editions from Lucknow, Kanpur, Gorakhpur, Patna, Ranchi and Kolkata on one hand and Mumbai, Hyderabad and Bangalore on the other hand. Similarly, 75-year-old Inquilab used to be the leading Urdu daily of Mumbai. In 2010, Jagran Prakashan bought it and spread it in the entire north India. Today, it is published from 14 centres including Delhi, Lucknow, Patna and Kolkata.
Hyderabad is one centre where Urdu newspapers continue to have a strong readership base. Siasat is the oldest and a hugely popular newspaper. Munsif and Aitemad are other newspapers which have their own committed readers. Hyderabadis have strong presence in Gulf countries, especially in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, Urdu newspapers of Hyderabad are also distributed in cities like Jeddah, Riyadh, Dammam, Dubai, etc.
In Patna, besides Inquilab and Rashtriya Sahara, Qaumi Tanzeem is a force while Pindar also has its own reach. Sangam, Azeemabad Express and a dozen more dailies are also published from Patna but they have either very limited circulation or published only for record to be sent to advertisers. This is the case with majority of small newspapers in India. Major Urdu dailies of Kolkata, besides Rashtriya Sahara, are Akhbar-e-Mashriq, Azad Hind and Aabshaar. Salaar is the oldest newspaper of Bangalore. Rashtriya Sahara is a new entrant here.
Newspapers published from Delhi give wide coverage to Bihar as Urdu readership consists mainly of people from Bihar. Even majority of journalists and staff working in Delhi newspapers are drawn from Bihar. Same is the case with Kolkata where Urdu speaking people come mainly from Bihar and eastern UP.
Urdu newspapers are generally read by lower middle class Muslims, elderly people, women, students of madrasa background or those studying in community-run schools. A good number of Muslims are today reading Hindi newspapers, a fact ignored by the editors/owners of Hindi newspapers giving almost no coverage or negative coverage to the community. Upper middle class Muslims generally read English newspapers. Urdu, if at all, is their second newspaper. Urdu newspapers lack professionalism. Owing to low salary, Urdu newspapers generally don't attract qualified or trained journalists.
Source: outlookindia.com/article/voters-and-villains/295457

In Mecca I Saw Little Of Islam’s Compassion, But A Lot Of Saudi Arabia’s Neglect



By Sabreena Razaq Hussain
Friday 2 October 2015
With 2 million people gathered in one small city for the hajj, some discomfort was to be expected. And putting up with it was, I initially thought, an opportunity to exercise the patience so very valued by our faith of Islam and in the holiest of cities. So we marched on hopefully.
Hajj crush: Saudi Arabia issues over 1,000 images suggesting death-toll rise
But with the 40-plus degree heat of Mecca, the harsh policing, the aggressive crowds, the chaotic organisation, the pressure was relentless. As the days went on, I couldn’t have felt a starker contrast between the spiritual tranquillity and contentment experienced within the confines of the Grand Mosque and sites, and the anxiety and distress caused by those policing it. Prior to my arrival in Saudi Arabia, accompanying my parents on pilgrimage, my ignorance had led me to believe that one of the richest Muslim countries in the world would be well organised in facilitating the rites of hajj. Now, back in the UK, I am grateful to be alive and still horrified by what I witnessed. I fully understand why hundreds of people were crushed to death and I don’t believe that “God’s will” can be used an excuse.
We’d had a pleasant and spiritual warm-up in the crowded but welcoming streets of Medina. Our group of UK pilgrims remained incredibly organised, my mother’s diabetes was stable and my father, an asthmatic, remained mercifully unaffected by the heat. As a pilgrim, daughter and a GP, I was happy and excited to be heading for Mecca. But the reality was a shock.
Even getting to and from the mosque and other sites was distressing. Accompanying wheelchair users, we had to help them on and off the wheelchairs many times as the pavements were almost knee high with no clear ramps or similar. Considering the number of people with permanent disability or debilitating conditions, this was shocking.
The heat was one of the biggest tests of all, causing many to become exhausted and dehydrated. Yet only a few of the crowded routes had supplies of water. Some of the common pilgrim routes, where the symbolic stoning of Satan takes place for example, were devoid of any water supplies other than the presence of young policemen occasionally squirting random pilgrims’ faces with water.
I did not see compassion from our hosts, I did not see their concern for our welfare
The manners and communication skills of the stewards and police deployed in and around the mosque were deplorable. With pilgrims from hundreds of countries, one would think that communication in at least one language other than Arabic would be available. This was not the case. Not only that, but their manner of aggressively shouting at even the most softly spoken of pilgrims was both needless and a cause of humiliation for those on the receiving end. Nobody had ever spoken to me or my parents in this way before.
It appeared the only thing the very young policemen were authorised to do was shout the Arabic word for “no” and to barricade entry routes as and when they pleased without warning, offering no alternative: clearly a recipe for a crush or a stampede in any of the holy sites.
We were in the mosque when they barricaded an exit and said we couldn’t leave until the next prayer finished, an hour and a half later. The physical pressure of hundreds of people had started to build up behind us, causing extreme anxiety and hyperventilation. I politely asked first, then literally begged the guards to let us exit as my mum’s diabetic medication was in our hotel which was quite near the mosque. Her sugar levels were dropping, but it made no difference. When we did finally find a pilgrim to translate for us, our exit was still refused. When I almost cried and asked “What happens if she collapses and dies here?”, the response was a shrug of the shoulders: if she dies she dies.
Aisha Khan, a Manchester-based business manager who was part of the same tour group told me a few days later of her anguish after the authorities would not open the barrier to let her husband through to her when she felt very unwell. She physically collapsed. Even then the stewards remained in a small group laughing, not helping him to call for an ambulance. She recalls him running distressed from one side of the road to another pleading for help.
Actually making it into an ambulance was another problem. I saw ambulances stuck in the stopped traffic with no provision for them to manoeuvre or overtake. Having stopped with a group of fellow pilgrims and doctors to help a lady slumped on the ground looking as if she may be having a heart attack, it was infuriating to find that when the so-called paramedics arrived (they appeared to be drivers in uniforms and not medically trained), they refused to even let us tell them what had happened. I partially stepped into the back of the ambulance concerned for the poor lady, to find no medical equipment visible whatsoever. We were shooed off and some of her family were left on the street in tears with no idea as to where the ambulance had gone.
There are numerous other distressing experiences I could relate, as most pilgrims can. But the insistence of some that the deaths of hundreds of people represented God’s will and were therefore unavoidable is something I refuse to accept. I believe Islam is based on reason: unless you have done everything you can within your means to actively avoid a bad situation, you cannot use the excuse of it being God’s will.
Some people who have made the pilgrimage before describe how things are slowly getting better with time. And the Saudi authorities are denying visas to pilgrims if they have done it in the past five years, in an attempt to control the influx. Heavy construction work is being completed at the mosque at the moment (the work indirectly led to the deaths of hundreds of people last month when one of the cranes fell through a roof at the Grand Mosque). But radical changes are required.
Much of the poor management of the hajj stems from the actual functioning of Saudi Arabia itself. Authorities around the holy sites are clearly not allowed to make independent decisions, while members of the royal family and their guests are treated as VIPs, and therefore have no motivation to push the authorities into creating a safe and workable system.
In Mecca I saw Muslims, but I saw little Islam. I did not see compassion from our hosts, I did not see their concern for our welfare. I urge all Muslims, pilgrims or otherwise, not to just accept the above as part of the challenge or experience of hajj, but to raise their voices. Write to your local MP, write to the Muslim Council of Britain and utilise your local community groups to express your outrage, and add to the clamour already building in the international arena.
Pilgrimage is supposed to enlighten and change lives, not endanger or end them. It is time to reclaim it.
Source: theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/02/hajj-muslims-mecca-islam-protest-saudi-arabia?CMP=fb_gu

The Truth About the Benghazi Investigation

The Truth About the Benghazi Investigation


By Carol Giacomo
OCTOBER 2, 2015
It has long appeared that the Republican obsession with investigating the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya was not a genuine attempt to get the facts behind a tragic incident in which four Americans, including the United States ambassador, lost their lives but a partisan witch hunt targeting Hillary Rodham Clinton, the frontrunner for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination.
Now there is proof of the duplicity and political chicanery behind the creation of the Select Committee on Benghazi. It was ham-handedly exposed by Representative Kevin McCarthy, who, in his quest to become the next speaker of the House, couldn’t resist boasting about what he considers his party’s major political accomplishment.
“Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?” Mr. McCarthy, Republican of California, told Fox News. “But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee, what are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping, why? Because she’s untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened.”
Now under heavy criticism for telling the truth and with his bid for speaker at risk, Mr. McCarthy is trying to walk back his remarks, but it won’t work.
Despite wasting $4.5 million and conducting one of the longest congressional probes in history, the committee has shed no significant new light on the Benghazi attack. It would be surprising if it did. Several other congressional committees and a panel of outside experts commissioned by the State Department have investigated the attack and the government’s response. They concluded that the tragedy was preventable and condemned “systemic failures” at senior levels of the State Department. But none found evidence that Mrs. Clinton, then secretary of state, was specifically to blame or produced any other bombshell to support some wild Republican conspiracy theories. Those earlier probes didn’t keep the Republicans from exploiting the issue for political gain by establishing the special committee, whose focus has segued from Benghazi to the fact that as secretary Mrs. Clinton used a private email account. To hear Democratic lawmakers tell it, the Republicans have thoroughly perverted any semblance of a fair process by calling and interviewing witnesses without bothering to include the committee’s minority members.
The committee should be disbanded and if the Republican leadership refuses to do that, then the panel’s Democratic members should resign. Manipulating government funds for political purposes in this way may well violate congressional ethics rules, as Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi has suggested. There is little reason to expect that Republicans, united in defeating Mrs. Clinton at all costs, care enough to do anything about it.
Source: http://goo.gl/5an4Mo

Countering Preachers of Violent Extremism متشدد انتہا پسند مبلغین کا مقابلہ: ہندوستانی مسلمانوں اور ساتھ ہی ساتھ حکومت کو بھی مستعد ہونے ضرورت ہے

غلام رسول دہلوی، نیو ایج اسلام
29 جون، 2015
اردو روزنامہ انقلاب کے مطابق نئی مصری حکومت نے سید قطب، حسن البنا، شیخ یوسف القرضاوی اور اخوان المسلمون کے دیگر تمام نظریہ سازوں کی کتابوں پر پابندی لگا دی ہے اور ان پر انتہا پسندی بھڑکانے کا بھی الزام ہے۔ مصری حکام نے بتایا کہ ہم ملک بھر میں تمام مساجد اور لائبریریوں سے اخوان المسلمین کی کتابوں کو ہٹانے کی منصوبہ بندی کر رہے ہیں۔ وزارت برائے مذہبی اوقاف کے سیکریٹری گیبر تائی نے کہا: "سلفی یا اخوان المسلمین یا گاما اسلامیہ کے تمام ارکان کی تمام کتابوں کو ان مقامات سے ہٹا دیا جائے گا"۔
اس میں کوئی شک نہیں ہے آج انتہا پسند مذہبی مبلغین سادہ لوح اور عام مسلمانوں کے ایک بہت بڑے طبقے کو گمراہ کر رہے ہیں۔ اس طرح آج عام لوگوں کے سادہ ذہنوں میں آسانی کے ساتھ انتہا پسندوں کے ذاتی مفادات کو پورا کرنے کےلیے علیحدگی پسندی، نفرت اور مذہبی انتہاءپسندی کے نظریات کو ڈالا جا رہا ہے۔
انتہا پسند خطبات براہ راست دوسرے مذاہب اور ثقافتوں کے تئیں مذہبی رویوں پر اثر انداز ہوتے ہیں۔ اور دنیا بھر اور خاص طور پر مسلم دنیا میں، بین نسلی بین المذہبی، فرقہ وارانہ اور مذہبی تنازعات کی آگ کو ہوا دینے میں ان کا اہم کردار ہوتا ہے۔
انتہا پسند مبلغین نوجوان اور بوڑھوں پر یکساں طور پر اثر انداز ہو سکتے ہیں، لیکن نوجوانوں کے لیے یہ مضرت رساں اور زہریلے وار زیادہ خطرناک ہیں۔ زیادہ تر معاملات میں، جن نوجوانوں کو ان کے مذہبی رہنما بنیاد پرست تقاریر کر کے برانگیختہ کرتے ہیں وہ ان کے نظریات کو عملی شکل دیتے ہیں۔ وہ ان بنیاد پرست خیالات و نظریات کو عملی شکل دینے کے لیے پرجوش ہیں۔ کچھ لوگ تو اس قدر ان کے نظریات کی رو میں بہہ چکے ہیں کہ وہ ہتھیار بھی اٹھانے کے لیے تیار ہیں۔
مذہبی مقررین اور علماء کی رسائی اور اثر و رسوخ کا دائرہ بہت وسیع جس کی وجہ سے وہ اچھے کام بھی کر سکتے ہیں اور برے کام بھی کر سکتے ہیں۔ جو مقررین اور مبلغین روادار، لبرل، ترقی پسند، عقلیت پسندی اور اعتدال پسندی جیسے اسلام کے حقیقی، آفاقی اقدار کو پیش کرتے ہیں وہ قیام امن میں ایک بااثر کردار ادا کر سکتے ہیں۔ دوسری جانب اپنے خطبات میں نفرت اگلنے والے انتہا پسند نظریہ ساز اپنے نظریاتی پیروکاروں کے انتہا پسند خیالات اور پر تشدد کارروائیوں کے لئے سب سے زیادہ ذمہ دار ہوں گے۔ لہذا، کمیونٹی کے ارکان کے لیےوہ افکار و نظریات باعث تشویش ہونے چاہئے جنہیں وہ مبلغین فروغ دیتے ہیں۔
ہندوستانی مسلمانوں کی بڑھتی ہوئی تعداد آہستہ آہستہ بنیاد پرست مبلغین کی جانب سے درپیش خطرات سے آگاہ ہو رہی ہے۔ اور ایسا کیوں نہ ہو؟ ہندستان بے شمار صوفیوں اور سنتوں کی سرزمین ہے۔ صوفی اسلام کی روایت انسانیت، ہمدردی، خیر سگالی، انسانی اخوت، امن، تکثیریت اور رواداری میں جامع ہندوستانی ثقافت کے مطابق موجود ہے۔ صوفی تعلیمات تکثیری روایات اور کثرت میں وحدت کے تصور پر مبنی ہیں۔
حالیہ دنوں میں، صوفی مسلمانوں نے ملک کے مسلمانوں کو بیدار کرنے کی کوشش میں بھارت کے کئی حصوں میں چھوٹے اجتماعات کے علاوہ "مسلم مہا پنچایت" نے بڑے پیمانے پر کانفرنسوں کا اہتمام کیا ہے۔ صوفی سنی مسلمانوں کو جو کہ ہندوستان میں کل مسلم آبادی کا تقریبا 80 فی صد ہے، ان کی قراردادوں میں ہندوستانی شیعوں کی تائید و توثیق حاصل ہے، جو کہ سرکاری حکام کو بھیج دیے گئے ہیں۔ ان اجتماعات میں سنی صوفی مسلمانوں نےاس بات کا اعلان کر دیا ہے کہ وہ انتہا پسند وہابیوں کی نہ تو امامت (مذہبی قیادت) اور نہ ہی قیادت (سیاسی قیادت) تسلیم کرتے ہیں۔
اس طرح کی ذہن سازی کی کوششوں کے نتیجے میں، ایک بنیاد پرست مبلغ اور اہل حدیثی مبلغ ڈاکٹر ذاکر نائیک کو مرکزی دھارے میں شامل ہندوستانی مسلمانوں کے مضبوط اور زبردست احتجاج کا سامنا کرنا پڑا۔ ممبئی میں واقع اسلامی ریسرچ فاؤنڈیشن کے صدر اور مسلم ممالک کے مشہور عوامی مقرر ڈاکٹر نائیک نے انڈیا اسلامک کلچرل سنٹر (IICC)، نئی دہلی میں 17 جنوری، 2015 کو ایک عوامی خطاب منعقد کیا۔ ایک بڑی تعداد میں سنی اور شیعہ دونوں پرادریوں پر مشتمل عام مسلمان IICC کے احاطے کے باہر جمع ہو کر سختی کے ساتھ ان کے خطاب کے خلاف احتجاج کا مظاہرہ کیا۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ ڈاکٹر نائیک نے صرف شیعہ اور سنی صوفی مسلمانوں اور غیر مسلموں کے جذبات کو ہی مجروح نہیں کیا ہے، بلکہ تمام مذاہب کی مذہبی ہم آہنگی اور احترام کے اقدار کی بے حرمتی بھی کی ہے۔ لہذا، انہیں ڈاکٹر نائیک کا IICC میں ایک مہمان خطیب کی حیثیت سے شامل ہونا مناسب نہیں لگتا، جس کا مقصد ہندوستان کے لوگوں کے درمیان فرقہ وارانہ ہم آہنگی اور اخوت و بھائی چارگی کی نمائندگی کرنا ہے۔
حال ہی میں اپنے موقف کی تائید و توثیق میں مرکزی دھارے میں شامل ہندوستانی مسلمانوں نے انتہاپسند وہابی مبلغین اور خاص طور پر یوسف القرضاوی کی جانب سے لاحق خطرات کے خلاف اپنے غصے کا مظاہرہ ایک پرامن اور جمہوری انداز میں بڑے پیمانے پر احتجاج کر کے کیا۔ عالمی شہرت یافتہ اور معروف مفتی نے اپنے فتوی میں نام نہاد جہادیوں کے خودکش بم حملے کا جواز پیش کرنے کی کوشش کی تھی۔ القرضاوی کو الجزیرہ ٹیلی ویژن پر ان کے ہفتہ وار پروگرام "شریعت اور زندگی" کے ذریعے دنیا بھر میں اب بھی شہرت اور مقبولیت حاصل ہو رہی ہے۔
آج، بہت سے ہندوستانی مسلمان سعودی اور قطری فنڈ پر چلنے والے بنیاد پرست مبلغین سے خوفزدہ ہیں۔ تاہم، ان میں سے چند افراد ہی القرضاوی کی کتابوں میں متشدد انتہا پسند مواد کو تسلیم کرنے کے لیے تیار ہیں۔ ایک ایسے وقت میں جب کہ مصری حکومت نے یوسف القرضاوی، سید قطب اور حسن البنا کی بنیاد پرست کتابوں پر پابندی عائد کر دی ہے، اگر ہندوستانی مسلمان بھی ایسا نہیں کرتے ہیں تو لوگوں کو ان کے بھولے پن پر حیرانی ہوگی۔ ہندوستان میں بے شمار سلفی اور اہل حدیثی مدارس نے ان عرب علماء کے نظریات کو قبول کر لیا ہے، اور ان مدارس نے مذہب اور عربی ادب میں ان کی کتابوں کو اپنے نصاب میں ​​ شامل کر لیا ہے۔ میں یہ بات اپنے ذاتی تجربے کی بنیاد پر کر رہا ہوں۔ میں نے صوفی مدرسہ میں کلاسیکی اسلامی تعلیم حاصل کی ہے وہاں ہمارے ایک استاذ نے دار العلوم ندوۃ العلماء لکھنؤ سے فراغت حاصل کی تھی جنہوں نے عربی زبان میں مہارت کو بہتر بنانے کے لیے ہمیں سید قطب کی کتابوں کو پڑھنے کا مشورہ دیا تھا۔ ظاہر ہے، ہمارے استاذ کی نیت مخلص تھی، لیکن اس سے یہ اندازہ لگانا مشکل نہیں ہے کہ ہمارے متاثر ذہنوں پر ان کتابوں کا کیا اثر ہو سکتا تھا اگر ہم بچپن سے ہی ایسی کتابوں سے واقف نہ ہوتے۔
پریشان کن بات تو یہ ہے کہ ہمارے ملک میں بھی سیکولر یونیورسٹیاں شعبہ اسلامیات میں اس بات کی کوئی جانچ پڑتال نہیں کرتیں کہ وہ اسلام اور عربی زبان کے نام پر کیسی کتابیں پڑھا رہے ہیں۔ دلچسپ بات یہ ہے کہ، ہندوستان کی اکثر مرکزی یونیورسٹیوں کے عربی شعبوں میں، پہلے اور دوسرے سال کے طالب علموں کو دار العلوم ندوۃ العلماء کے سابق سربراہ مولانا ابو الحسن علی ندوی کی کتاب "مختارات من ادب العربی" (عربی نثر کا ایک مجموعہ) پڑھائی جاتی ہے۔ اس کتاب میں سید قطب سمیت کئی اسلامی مبلغین کی ایسی تحریریں اور رائے شامل ہیں جن سے اسلام کی ان کی خاص تعبیر و تشریح کا اظہار ہوتا ہے۔
اب وہ وقت آ چکا ہے کہ ہندوستانی مسلمان اور ساتھ ہی ساتھ ہندوستانی حکومت بھی بنیاد پرستی کے خاتمے کے لیے مصر، چیچنیا، بنگلہ دیش اور قزاقستان کے نقش قدم پر چلے۔ ان ریاستوں نے تمام شکلوں میں بنیاد پرست اسلام اور وہابیت پر پابندی عائد کر دی ہے، خاص طور پر مساجد، مدارس اور اسکولوں کے نصاب میں۔ انہوں نے امن کی بحالی اور انتہا پسندی کی روک تھام کے مقصد سے بنیاد پرست وہابی اماموں جگہ امن پسند اور اعتدال پسند لوگوں کو بحال کیا ہے۔ سب سے اہم بات یہ ہے کہ سب سے قدیم سنی صوفی اسلامی تعلیمی ادارہ، الازہر یونیورسٹی، قاہرہ، نے بنیاد پرستی پر مبنی وہابی نظریہ کی مذمت کی ہے۔ الازہر کے سربراہ، احمد الطیب نے وہابیوں کی بدعنوان اسلامی تشریحات کو دنیا میں پرتشدد انتہا پسندی کی جڑ قرار دیا ہے۔
بہر حال، افسوس کی بات یہ ہے کہ ہندوستانی حکومت نے انتہا پسند اسلامی مبلغین کی موجودگی اور ان کے اثر و رسوخ کو نظر انداز کیا ہے۔ ظاہر ہے کہ آج ہندوستان ایک ایسے موڑ پر کھڑ اہے کہ اگر صورت حال کنٹرول سے باہر ہوئی تو اسے سنگین مسائل کا سامنا کرنا ہو گا۔
نفرت اور دہشت گردی کے نظریہ کو صرف محبت اور امن کے نظریہ سے ہی شکست دیا جا سکتا ہے۔ اعتدال پسند اسلامی مبلغین انتہا پسندی کا مقابلہ کرنے اور ترقی پسندی اور اعتدال پسندی کو فروغ دینے میں ایک فعال کردار ادا کر سکتے ہیں۔ اگرچہ،سول سوسائٹی کے کارکنان بھی اس شعبہ میں ایک اہم کردار ادا کر سکتے ہیں، علماء اور دیگر مذہبی قائدین انتہا پسندی کو کنٹرول کرنے کی بہترین حکمت عملی تیار کر سکتے ہیں۔ سب سے پہلے نوجوانوں کو اس بات کی نصیحت کرنا ضروری ہے کہ وہ ایسے کسی بھی مذہبی مبلغ کے لئے کوئی گنجائش نہ رکھیں جو نفرت بھرے خطبات سے ان کے دماغ کو بھرنے کی کوشش کرتے ہیں۔ بنیاد پرست مبلغین کو ان کے مذموم اثر و رسوخ کو پھیلانے سے روکنے میں ریاست کی بھی ایک اہم ذمہ داری ہے۔

URL for English article:

Mecca Belongs To All Muslims مکہ مکرمہ تمام مسلمانوں کی مذہبی میراث ہے، اور اس پر سعودی عرب کا تسلط ناقابل قبول


 
ہارون مغل
25 ستمبر 2015
پٹرولیم اور حج
یہ دونوں چیزیں مل کر سعودی عرب کو اتنی توانائی فراہم کرتی ہیں کہ وہ دنیا کی ایک سب سے رجعت پسندانہ حکومت کی قیادت کرتا ہے جس سے اسے اسلام میں ایک زبردست اثر و رسوخ حاصل کرنے کا موقع ملتا ہے۔ اب وہ وقت آ چکا ہے کہ ہم اس کے متبادل کے بارے میں سوچیں۔
اب آپ کو یہ بات سمجھ میں آ چکی ہو گی کہ کیوں سعودی عرب عالم اسلام کے لیے خطرناک ہے۔ اس لیے کہ سعود خاندان کا تسلط مکہ پر ہے، جہاں مسلمانوں کا قبلہ ہےاور جہاں مسلمان حج ادا کرتے ہیں،  اور مدینہ پر بھی ہے جہاں نبی صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نے سب سے پہلے ایک مسلم معاشرے کی تعمیر کی، جہاں نبی صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کا وصال ہوا اور جہاں آپ مدفون ہوئے، یہ سلطنت ایک اسلامی ورثہ ہے۔  اور اس کے برعکس۔ یہ دنیا کا ایک واحد مسلم اکثریتی ملک ہے جہاں عورتیں گاڑی نہیں چلا سکتیں، کیونکہ یہ ایک ایسا ملک ہے جس کا تسلط حرمین شریفین پر ہے، اور ایسا مانا جاتا ہے کہ اسلام خواتین کو ڈرائیونگ کرنے کی اجازت نہیں دیتا ہے۔ یہ ان چند مسلم اکثریتی ممالک میں سے ایک ہے جہاں مطلقاً شہنشاہیت ہے، اسی لیے یہاں یہ مانا جاتا ہے کہ اسلام ایک ایسی حکومت کو ترجیح دیتا ہے جو کسی کے بھی سامنے جواب دہ نہ ہو۔
بہت سے معاملات میں سعودی عرب نے اسلام کی ساکھ کو داغدار کیا ہے۔ لیکن سعودی عرب کا اسلام پر ایک الگ قسم کا اثر و رسوخ ہے۔ ہر سال، لاکھوں حجاج کرام کعبہ کا طواف کرنے کے لیے مکہ آتے ہیں؛ ہمارا عقیدہ ہے کہ بیت اللہ کی تعمیر حضرت ابراہیم علیہ السلام نے خدا کے احترام اور اعزاز میں کی تھی، اور نبی صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم  نے اللہ کی عبادت کے لئے اسے بحال کیا تھا۔ بہت سے لوگ غریب ممالک سے آتے ہیں، اور واضح طور پر سعودی عرب کی عالی شان و سوکت، شاہانہ دولت کا نظارہ اور اس مسجد کی چمک دھمک، رونق اور عظمت کو دیکھ کر حیران اور ششدر رہ جاتے ہیں جسے ان کے لیے تعمیر کیا گیا ہے۔
مجھے معلوم ہے کہ بہت سے لوگوں کو  کیسا محسوس ہوتا ہو گا۔ خدا نے سعودیوں کو بے حساب و کتاب دولت سے نوازا ہے، اور انہیں  حرمین شریفین پر تسلط عطا کیا ہے، اس کا مطلب یہ ضرور یہ ہوگا کہ اللہ ان کے اسلام سے راضی ہے۔
اور ان کا اسلام ہے کیا۔ سعودی اسلام، وہابیت، کا جنم صرف یہ کہ شیعہ اسلام اور شیعہ اور سنی اسلام میں موجود روحانیت کی مضبوط روایات بلکہ سنی عثمانی خلیفہ کے خلاف پرتشدد بغاوت کے نتیجے میں ہوا تھا۔ دنیا کی معروف سنی طاقت نہ ہونےکے باوجود، سعودی عرب نے  سنی سلطنت پر قبضہ کر لیا، جس سے اس کی چھوٹی آبادی، عظیم دولت کے ساتھ اس کے سابق حریفوں کا خاتمہ کر کے حکومت قائم کرنے میں مدد ملی۔ سعودی عرب مسلم دنیا میں وہابیت کو پھیلانے اور مکہ اور مدینہ کو تبدیل کرنے لئے بھی پیٹرول ڈالر کا استعمال کرتا ہے۔
حالیہ دہائیوں میں، سعودی عرب نے مکہ اور مدینہ کی زیادہ سے زیادہ تعمیرنو کی ہے۔ اس میں سے کچھ ضروری تھی۔ اس میں سے کچھ بہت شاندار ہیں۔ لیکن اس میں سے کچھ کی تعمیر  اسلامی یادگاروں اور قدیم ترین مساجد کی  قیمت پر کی گئی ہے، جنہیں کچھ سوچے سمجھے بغیر ہی منہدم کر دیا گیا ہے۔
انصاف کی بات تو یہ ہے کہ شہری تعمیر و ترقی کے لیے سعودی عرب پر کچھ تنقید غیر معقول ہے۔ وہ اس طرح کہ: جدید ٹیکنالوجی اور بڑھتی ہوئی معیار زندگی کی بدولت لاکھوں لوگ نہ صرف یہ کہ مکہ جانا چاہتے ہیں بلکہ اس کے متحمل بھی ہیں۔ اور وہاں کا سفر اب مہینوں نہیں بلکہ کچھ دنوں اور یہاں تک کہ چند گھنٹوں کا کام ہے۔ وہ مختلف زبانیں بولتے ہیں مختلف تہذیب و تمدن کی نمائندگی کرتے ہیں، اور نہ صرف یہ کہ یہ تمام لوگ ایک ہی مسجد میں عبادت کرنا چاہتے ہیں، بلکہ اس کے بیچ کعبہ کے قریب بھی ہونا چاہتے ہیں۔ اگر چہ یہ تصور کرنا اچھا ہے کہ مکہ اور مدینہ میں پرانے شہروں کی فن تعمیر اور اس کی آرائش و زیبائش کو برقرار رکھا جا سکتا ہے، لیکن یہ غیر حقیقی بھی ہے۔
وہ مہلک ہو سکتے ہیں
بلند و بالا  عمارتیں ایک قدیم شہر کی مبینہ ماحول کو تباہ و برباد کر سکتی ہیں، لیکن ہر جدید شہرکاری کرنے والا جانتا ہے کہ تعمیر اکثر صرف ایک حقیقت پسندانہ راستہ ہوتا ہے۔ لہٰذا یہ بات کسی کے لیے حیرت انگیز نہیں ہے کہ سعودی عرب نے مکہ کی عظیم مسجد کے باہر دنیا کی تیسری سب سے بلند عمارت تعمیر کی ہے۔ لیکن سب سے بڑا سوال یہ ہے کہ کیوں یہ دنیا میں پہلی سب سے بدصورت عمارت ہے؟ سیل فون کے زمانے میں  اور  یہاں تک کہ ایک ایسے مذہب کے ہوتے ہوئے جس میں باقاعدہ نماز پنجگانہ  کی دعوت دینے کی خصوصیت ہے اس عمارت کے اوپر ایک پرشکوہ گھڑی لٹانے کا مقصد کیا ہے؟ سب سے بڑا سوال یہ بڑے بڑے ٹاورز ایک مسطح دین کے لئے وقف ایک شہر کی درجہ بندی کے لیےبڑھتی ہوئی آمدنی کا حصہ ہیں۔ حج میں ہم سب ایک ہی طرح کا لباس پہنے ہوئے اور ایک ساتھ کندھے سے کندھا ملا کر عبادت کرتے ہوئے برابر ہیں، لیکن ہم جیسے ہی اپنے ہوٹلوں میں پہنچتے ہیں درجہ  بندی شروع ہو جاتی ہے۔ مکہ میں بے تحاشہ دولت ہے،  اوسط اور غریب طبقے کے حاجیوں سے یہ دولت  حاصل کی گئی ہے، جبکہ اس شہر کی مقدس تاریخ کو مٹا دیا گیا ہے۔ لہٰذا، اگر چہ جدید مذہبی زندگی کی ضروریات کا مطلب یہ ہو سکتا ہے کہ پرانے مساجد، مزارات اور تاریخی مقامات سد راہ بن رہے ہیں، لیکن اس سے انہیں تباہ کرنے کا مطالبہ پیدا نہیں ہوتا۔
دولت کی فراوانی کو دیکھتے ہوئے سعودی حکومت آسانی سے دوسری جگہوں پر ان مقدس اسلامی ورثہ کی دوبارہ تعمیر کر سکتی تھی۔
لیکن انہوں نے اس کی کوشش بھی نہیں کی۔ ایسا لگتا ہے کہ انہوں نے اسلامی تاریخ کے خلاف جنگ چھیڑ رکھی ہے،  اور شاید اس کے پیچھے مقصد یہ ہے کہ ایسی کوئی بھی چیز نہ بچے جو اس حقیقت کو چیلنج پیش کر سکے کہ وہابیت اسلامی تاریخ میں ایک دخل اندازی ہے، اور وہ اس کے تئیں وفادار نہیں ہے۔
اگر آپ کو یہ لگتا ہے کہ قدیم باقیات کے خلاف داعش کی جنگ ہولناک ہے تو آپ صحیح ہیں۔ لیکن یہ غیر معمولی بات نہیں ہے۔ بلکہ سعودیوں کے گمراہ کن بت شکنی کے اصول میں اس کی جڑیں مضبوط ہیں، جس کی بنیاد پر وہابیوں نے ان تمام قدیم مقامات کو  تباہ و برباد  کر کے مٹا دیا ہے جو دنیا بھر میں مسلمانوں کے درمیان مشہور و معروف تھے۔ اگر آپ کو  لگتا ہے کہ میں مبالغہ کر رہا ہوں تو یہ غلط ہے۔ کئی سال پہلے میں نے امریکی مسلمانوں کے ایک چھوٹا سے گروپ کے ساتھ حج اور عمرہ کے لیے  حرمین شریفین کا سفر کیا۔ ہمارے ساتھ ایک سعودی گائیڈ بھی تھا، جس نے مکہ اور مدینہ میں ہمارے سفر بس کے دوران تاریخی اہمیت کی حامل کسی بھی مساجد کے  قریب بس کو روکنے نہیں دیا، کیوں کہ اسے یہ لگا کہ ہم حد سے تجاوز کر جائیں گے اور  ایسے انداز میں عبادت کریں گے جو ان سخت دل وہابیوں کے لیے نامناسب ہے۔ اس نے ہمارے ساتھ بچوں کی طرح سلوک کیا۔
جو کہ ظاہر ہے، ہم میں سے کوئی بھی نہیں تھا: نہ وہابی اوسر نہ ہی بچہ۔ (اس کے بدلہ میں، میں نے اپنے اس سفر کے درمیان سلطنت عثمانیہ کے مقامات کے بارے میں خوشی خوشی اپنے ساتھیوں کو بتایا، اور سعود کے گھر کو مسلمانوں کے خلاف غیر مسلم طاقتوں کے ساتھ سعود کا گندا اتحاد بتایا)۔ میرے ساتھی حجاج کرام غضبناک تھے۔ انہوں نے اس کے لیے رقم کی ادائیگی کی تھی اور انہیں ان کے مقدس شہر میں رکنے کی بھی اجازت نہیں تھی ۔ مثال کے طور پر، ہمیں اس مسجد کے پاس رکنے سے روک دیا گیا جہاں پیغمبر اسلام صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کو نماز میں قبلہ اول یعنی  یروشلم سے موجودہ قبلہ کی طرف چہرہ پھیرنے کا حکم دیا گیا تھا۔ (یہ مسلمانوں کے لیے اہم ہے)۔ انہیں اس بات پر غم و غصہ محسوس ہوا۔ انہیں ایسا محسوس ہوا کہ انہیں اپنے اسلام کا تجربہ کرنے کے ایک شاندار موقع سے محروم کر دیا گیا ہے اس لیے کہ کسی اور نے اسلام کے بارے میں ان کی تشریح کا فیصلہ کیا، جو کہ زیادہ تکلیف دہ تھا۔
اور قابل توجہ امر بھی یہی ہے۔ مکہ اور مدینہ میں حکومت سعودی عرب کی ہے، لیکن وہ مسلم دنیا کی میراث ہیں۔ وہ اجتماعی طور پر مسلمانوں کی مقدس میراث ہیں۔ حرمین شریف کو کسی ایک فرد کی ملکیت میں نہیں ہونا چاہئے۔ اسلام ایک مساوات کا علمبردار مذہب ہے۔ (بعض مسلمان مذاق کے طور پر یہ کہتے ہیں کہ منظم مذہب کو ناپسند کرنے والوں کو اسلام میں شامل ہو جانا چاہیے اس لیے کہ ہم نے  انتشار اور تفرقہ میں مہارت حاصل کر لی ہے)۔ اسلام میں چند اہل مراتب ہیں اور جو موجود ہیں ان کے درمیان وسیع پیمانے پر اشتراک نہیں ہے۔ لہٰذا، کیوں ایک ایسی حکومت کو ہمارے مقدس شہروں پر تسلط قائم کرنے کی اجازت ہو جو مسلمانوں کے ایک طبقے کی نمائندگی کرتی ہے اور ایک ایسے نظریہ کی اشاعت کرتی ہے اور اسے دوسروں پر مسلط کرتی ہے جو تاریخی طور پر تکثیریت، روحانیت اور افاقیت پر مبنی اسلام کی جامع روایات سے متضاد ہے؟ اس میں عام مسلمانوں کا عمل دخل کیوں نہیں ہونا چاہیے؟
مکہ اور مدینہ میں سعودی عرب کی حکومت ہے، لیکن وہ مسلم دنیا کی میراث ہیں۔
یہ وقت کی بات ہے۔ یورپی یونین میں دنیا کے کچھ امیر ترین، انتہائی ترقی پسند اور محفوظ معاشرے شامل ہیں۔ لیکن اس کے باوجود پناہ گزینوں کے بحران کے سامنے وہ بے یار و مددگار منقسم اور منتشر ہو چکے ہیں اور ان کے درمیان تعاون کا فقدان ہے۔ ابھی جب اہل یورپ ایسا نہیں کر سکتے ہیں تو  کس طرح موجود مسلم دنیا اس کے کسی بھی قسم کے متبادل منظم و نسق کا  انتظام کر سکتی ہے، یعنی یہ کس طرح اپنی مشترکہ میراث کے لیے مزید جامع اور مشترکہ انتظامیہ منظم کر سکتی ہے؟ مسلم دنیا ابھی بری طرح سے اختلاف و انتشار کا شکار ہے؛ ابھی اس کے تعلق سے کسی بھی تعاون پر مبنی معاہدے کا تصور کرنا  ایک مشکل ترین امر ہے، اور اسی طرح ان دوسری مسلم اکثریتی حکومتوں کے بارے میں بھی یہ گمان کرنا مشکل نہیں ہے جو  مکہ اور مدینہ سے ایک مختلف مفاد حاصل کریں گے۔
لیکن یہ کب تک چلے گا؟
سالوں پہلے سفر حج صرف چند خوش قسمت افراد کے لیے ہی محفوظ تھا۔ سفر بہت طویل، بہت خطرناک اور بہت مہنگا تھا۔ خود میرے پردادا شمالی ہندوستان سے حج کے لیے سفر مکہ کی روداد بیان کرتے ہیں، لیکن واپسی میں دوران سفر ان کی موت واقع ہو گئی۔ آج، ہم حج چینلز کے ذریعہ حج کا نظارہ کرتے ہیں۔ ہوائی جہاز نے دنیا کو بہت چھوٹا بنانا دیا ہے۔ خبریں بہت تیزی کے ساتھ پھیل جاتی ہیں۔ مسلمان پوری دنیا میں آباد ہیں۔ میرے کہنے کا مطلب یہ ہے کہ ماضی میں لوگوں کے اندر یہ احساس شدید تھا کہ مکہ اور مدینہ ہم تمام لوگوں کی ایک مشترکہ مذہبی میراث ہے۔ آنے والے سالوں میں سعودی عرب کے لیے دنیا بھر کے مسلمانوں کو ان کے مقدس شہر کی زیارت کرنے سے روکنا، ان کے احترام کو روکنا اور ایک ایسے نظریہ کو مسلمانوں پر تھوپنا مشکل ہو جائے گا جو نہ کہ صرف پوری دنیا کے لیے اجنبی ہےبلکہ مسلم دنیا میں بھی مکمل طور پر غیر مقبول ہے۔
ماخذ:
qz.com/511115/its-time-to-take-mecca-out-of-saudi-hands
URL for English article: