Integrating Scientific Inquiry and Revelatory Wisdom

By V.A. Mohamad Ashrof, New Age Islam 9 August 2025 For centuries, the story of the relationship between science and religion has too often been told as a tale of conflict and mutual exclusion. This narrative, a relic of specific historical clashes in the West, has cast a long shadow, forcing a false and impoverished choice upon the modern mind: one must either embrace the empirical rigor of science or the revelatory truth of faith. This paper argues for a more hopeful, integrated, and authentically humanistic path. Through a progressive and liberatory hermeneutic of the Quran, we can move beyond this tired dichotomy to embrace a vision where science and revelation are not adversaries, but complementary and essential modes of human knowing. This is not an exercise in "concordism"—the anachronistic attempt to find modern scientific facts in ancient scripture—but a deeper philosophical and spiritual inquiry. It is an exploration of how a sacred text, when read with an eye toward human flourishing, can provide a framework that both honours the power of scientific inquiry and addresses its inherent and necessary limitations, ultimately liberating human consciousness from the constraints of a purely materialistic worldview. The purpose of this monograph is ecumenical and inclusive. While its primary textual source is the Quran, the principles it uncovers resonate with a universal human quest for knowledge and meaning. The Quranic call for epistemological humility finds profound echoes in Socratic wisdom, Kantian philosophy, and the contemplative traditions of the East. Its emphasis on a purposeful cosmos speaks to the existential yearnings explored in philosophies and arts across all cultures. This paper, therefore, uses the Quran as a powerful case study for a broader humanistic project: the weaving of our rational-empirical faculties with our intuitive, spiritual, and ethical sensibilities into a more complete and coherent tapestry of being. Our hermeneutical approach is liberatory. It seeks to free the Quran from dogmatic and literalist interpretations that would place it in opposition to scientific discovery. Simultaneously, it seeks to free the human spirit from the "epistemological prison" of scientism—the reductionist belief that what is not measurable is not real. True intellectual liberation, this paper contends, comes not from choosing one mode of knowing over the other, but from understanding the unique domain, function, and wisdom of each. We will argue that the Quran, when interpreted progressively, does not impose limits on science to constrain it, but rather delineates its boundaries to complete it. It offers a luminous boundary—a line that does not function as a wall, but as a horizon, which, by its very existence, gives depth, perspective, and meaning to the landscape before us. By exploring the Quran's perspective on the finitude of human knowledge, the purpose of existence, and the foundation of ethics, we can chart a course toward a holistic epistemology that champions both scientific progress and spiritual wisdom, fostering a more just, compassionate, and meaningful human presence in the cosmos. The Quranic Impetus for Rational and Empirical Inquiry Any discussion of limits must begin with an affirmation of what is being limited. The Quranic perspective on science is not, at its core, a restrictive one. On the contrary, its foundational message is a radical call to intellectual liberation. The very first word revealed to the Prophet Muhammad was not "believe," "submit," or "obey," but Iqra’—"Read!" (Quran 96:1). This inaugural command is a profound sanctioning of the human intellect. It is an injunction against ignorance, blind imitation (Taqlid), and intellectual passivity. In the context of 7th-century Arabia, a largely oral culture steeped in ancestral traditions, this was a revolutionary act. It positioned literacy, learning, and the active pursuit of knowledge as the very bedrock of faith. The Brazilian educator and philosopher Paolo Freire famously argued that true education is a practice of freedom, a means of critically engaging with and transforming the world (Freire, p.71-75). The Quranic command to "Read!" can be understood in this liberatory sense—it is a call to awaken human consciousness and engage the world with open eyes and a critical mind. This imperative is woven throughout the Quran. The text relentlessly invites its audience to exercise their faculties of reason (‘Aql), reflection (Tafakkur), observation (Nazar), and deep contemplation (Tadabbur). It does not demand a faith that is divorced from evidence; rather, it points to the entire cosmos as a source of evidence. The universe is presented as a book of "signs" (Ayat), a term that significantly is also used for the verses of the Quran itself. This linguistic parallel establishes a powerful equivalence: the created world is a form of divine speech, and to study it is an act of sacred reading. "Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of the night and the day," the Quran declares, "are signs for those of understanding" (Quran 3:190). This perspective provides the metaphysical groundwork upon which a robust scientific enterprise can be built. It posits a universe that is not a chaotic, unintelligible illusion, but an orderly, coherent, and knowable reality (Haqq), governed by consistent patterns and laws (Sunan Allah Fi’l-Kawn). This worldview gives the scientist permission—indeed, a sacred mandate—to explore, measure, and understand these patterns. It is this intellectual framework that fuelled the extraordinary scientific and philosophical flourishing in the classical Islamic world. Scholars from Ibn al-Haytham, the father of modern optics, to al-Khwarizmi, who gave us algebra and algorithms, were devout individuals who saw no conflict between their faith and their rigorous empirical work. They were, in essence, responding to the Quranic call to read the signs of God in the book of nature. As George Saliba has meticulously documented, the scientific advancements of this era were not in spite of Islamic teachings, but were often directly inspired by them (Saliba, p.112). Therefore, a progressive and humanistic hermeneutic of the Quran begins by reclaiming this legacy. The Quran liberates the human mind to question, to explore, and to seek knowledge. It dignifies the scientific endeavour as a noble and spiritual pursuit. It is only from this position of profound respect for rational inquiry that the Quran proceeds to delineate the boundaries of the scientific method. These boundaries, as we will see, are not meant to devalue science, but to protect humanity from the intellectual hubris of mistaking a part of knowledge for the whole. Epistemological Boundaries as Liberating Wisdom The Quran’s most profound contribution to the dialogue on science and religion lies in its sophisticated epistemology, which centres on the principle of humility. It establishes a fundamental distinction between the finite, partial, and provisional nature of human knowledge and the infinite, absolute, and all-encompassing nature of divine knowledge. This distinction is not a threat to human dignity but a liberation from the impossible burden of omniscience. The Quran states this principle with elegant simplicity: “...and you have not been given of knowledge except a little (Qalīl)” (Quran 17:85). This is not a pessimistic assessment of human potential but a realistic and grounding one. It is a timeless insight that resonates deeply with the greatest minds in both philosophy and science. It is the very essence of Socratic wisdom, encapsulated in the famous paradox, "I know that I know nothing." This acknowledgment of ignorance is the first step toward true knowledge. The history of science is a continuous story of this Quranic and Socratic humility in action. Each major scientific revolution, from Copernicus to Einstein to the discoverers of quantum mechanics, has been a humbling lesson, revealing that our previous "certainties" were merely useful approximations of a deeper and often stranger reality. As physicist Richard Feynman admitted about our most successful physical theory, "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics" (Feynman, p.129). This is the voice of intellectual honesty, an echo of the Quranic reminder of our "little knowledge." This general principle of humility is given a specific metaphysical structure in the Quran through the distinction between the world of the seen or witnessed (‘Alam Al-Shahadah) and the world of the unseen (‘Alam Al-Ghayb). Al-Shahadah is the realm of empirical reality, the world accessible to our five senses and their instrumental extensions—the telescope, the microscope, the particle accelerator. This is the proper and magnificent domain of science. Al-Ghaib, however, refers to a dimension of reality that is ontologically different and methodologically inaccessible to empirical tools. This includes the ultimate nature of God, the reality of non-material consciousness or the soul (ruh), and the ultimate destiny of the individual. The Quran is unequivocal that this realm belongs to God: “And with Him are the keys of the unseen; none knows them except Him” (Quran 6:59). This concept offers a powerful, ecumenical parallel to the philosophical framework of Immanuel Kant. Kant, in his Critique of Pure Reason, distinguished between the "phenomenal" world (the world as it appears to our senses and is structured by our minds, the subject of science) and the "noumenal" world (the world of "things-in-themselves," which lies forever beyond our direct cognitive grasp) (Kant, p.24-25). The Quranic distinction between Shahadah and Ghaib is a revelatory articulation of a similar, profound epistemological boundary. This boundary is not a cage but a guide. It frees science from the burden of having to pronounce on things it is not equipped to study. When science is silent on the question of God’s existence, it is not evidence of His non-existence; it is evidence of science operating correctly and honestly within its phenomenal, Shahadah-bound domain. To demand that science, prove or disprove God is a category error, like demanding a thermometer measure the beauty of a sunset. The Quran liberates science to do what it does best—explain the mechanics of the witnessed world—while reserving questions of ultimate reality and meaning for a different mode of knowing: revelation. Furthermore, this recognition of an unseen, mysterious dimension to reality fosters a sense of wonder and awe, which the Jewish theologian Abraham Joshua Heschel called "radical amazement." Heschel argued that this feeling is the root of both true science and true religion (Heschel, p.45-46). It is the feeling of standing before what the Christian philosopher Rudolf Otto termed the Mysterium Tremendum Et Fascinans—the awesome and fascinating mystery of being (Otto, p.12-13). The Quran cultivates this sense of awe, framing the universe as a place of profound mystery that points beyond itself. By acknowledging the luminous boundary of the unseen, we are invited into a state of perpetual wonder, a posture of humility that is the hallmark of both the greatest scientists and the most profound spiritual seekers. The Quest for Meaning: The Metaphysical and Teleological Horizon Human beings are meaning-seeking creatures. We can endure almost any "how" if we have a "why." The philosopher Albert Camus, reflecting the predicament of modern consciousness in a purely materialistic cosmos, concluded that the fundamental question of philosophy was suicide—deciding whether or not a life devoid of inherent meaning was worth living (Camus, p.3). Science, by its very design, is silent on this ultimate question. Its methodology, known as methodological naturalism, confines it to explaining the "how" of the universe through natural causes and processes. It is exceptionally proficient at this task, but it is structurally incapable of addressing the "why." This is not a failure of science; it is a feature of its design. The Quran steps into this existential silence, offering a powerful and life-affirming narrative of purpose (teleology). The Quran posits that the universe is not a "tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." It is a coherent text, created Bi’l-Haqq—with truth, justice, and purpose. "And We did not create the heaven and the earth and that between them in play," the Quran asserts (Quran 21:16). The intricate order and beauty of the cosmos are not the result of a blind, random cosmic lottery, but are signs of a conscious, creative, and benevolent intelligence. This teleological claim provides a metaphysical anchor for human existence. It reframes our lives from a fleeting accident in a cold, indifferent universe to a significant chapter in a grand, purposeful cosmic story. The ultimate purpose of human existence, in this narrative, is defined as ‘Ibadah—a term often translated as "worship" but whose meaning is far richer. It is the conscious, willing, and loving alignment of one's life with the creative and compassionate will of the universe's source. It is to live in a state of grateful awareness of the gift of existence. "And I did not create the jinn and mankind except to [know and] worship Me" (Quran 51:56). This gives human life an intrinsic, transcendent purpose that no amount of material success or scientific discovery alone can provide. It answers the existential cry of the human heart for meaning. Moreover, the Quran’s vision of the human being challenges the reductionism that often accompanies a purely scientific worldview. While acknowledging our physical origins from "dust" or "clay," it posits a transcendent dimension: the divine "breath" of the soul, or Ruh, which is the seat of consciousness, free will, and our capacity for love, beauty, and moral choice (Quran 15:29). This dual nature—the integration of the physical and the spiritual—provides a more complete and humanistic picture of who we are. It validates our inner, subjective experience, which scientific materialism often dismisses as a mere epiphenomenon of brain chemistry. The Quran affirms that our consciousness is not a "ghost in the machine," but the very essence of our being, a spark of the divine mystery that science can observe the effects of but never fully dissect. By offering a narrative of purpose and a holistic vision of the human person, the Quran does not contradict science; it contextualizes and enriches it. It takes the scientific description of what a human is (a collection of cells, a product of evolution) and embeds it within a meaningful story of who a human is (a spiritual being with a sacred purpose). It provides the "why" that makes the scientific "how" a story worth telling. Science, Stewardship, and Human Flourishing Perhaps the most urgent limitation of science in the 21st century lies in the realm of ethics. The scientific method is value-neutral. It can give us the power to edit the human genome with CRISPR technology, to develop artificial general intelligence, or to irrevocably alter the planet’s climate. It cannot, however, provide the wisdom to wield this immense power responsibly. This is the classic is-ought problem: science describes what is, but it cannot prescribe what ought to be. The Quran addresses this ethical void by providing a transcendent moral framework rooted in the concepts of stewardship (Khilafah), justice (‘Adl), and compassion (Rahmah). When read progressively, the Quranic concept of Khilafah is a profound and radical call to responsible human agency. It posits that humanity has been entrusted with the role of being God's stewards or vice-regents on Earth (Quran 2:30). This is not a license for domination and exploitation, as it has sometimes been tragically misinterpreted, but a sacred responsibility to care for, protect, and cultivate the flourishing of all creation. This ethical framework is not based on shifting human conventions or utilitarian calculations, but on a divine trust. This perspective provides a powerful moral compass for navigating the complex ethical dilemmas created by scientific advancement. In the face of climate change, the principle of Khilafah demands that we act not just out of self-interest, but out of a sacred duty to preserve the ecological balance (Mizan) established by God (Quran 55:7-9). In the field of bioethics, it urges us to approach technologies like genetic engineering not with the hubris of remaking creation in our own image, but with the humility of our role as caretakers, ensuring that our interventions promote healing and dignity rather than new forms of inequality and suffering. Regarding the development of artificial intelligence, it calls for us to embed values of justice and compassion into our algorithms, ensuring that our creations serve human flourishing rather than becoming tools of oppression or control. The Quran warns that knowledge divorced from morality is a path to self-destruction. It commands believers to “do good; indeed, Allah loves the doers of good,” and to not “throw [yourselves] with your [own] hands into destruction” (Quran 2:195). The scientific quest, therefore, is not exempt from this moral imperative. It must be guided by an ethic of care and responsibility. The value-neutrality of science is a methodological strength but an ethical vulnerability. The Quranic worldview provides the necessary moral and ethical "software" to run on the powerful "hardware" of scientific knowledge, guiding its application toward the universal humanistic goals of justice, peace, and the preservation of dignity for all life. Threads of Wonder: Exploring the Interplay of Knowledge and Meaning The Quran, when approached through a humanistic, liberatory, and progressive hermeneutic, does not present a worldview at odds with science. Instead, it offers a more capacious and complete vision of reality, one in which scientific inquiry is a cherished and essential thread, but only one thread in a much richer tapestry of being. The limitations of science, from this perspective, are not weaknesses to be overcome, but wise and luminous boundaries that define its proper and powerful role. These boundaries are: First, epistemological: a humble recognition of our finitude and the existence of a reality, Al-Ghaib, that transcends our empirical grasp, inviting us into a state of perpetual wonder. Second, they are metaphysical: an acknowledgment that the scientific "how" finds its ultimate significance within the revelatory "why," situating our lives within a purposeful cosmos and affirming our nature as beings of both body and spirit. Finally, they are ethical: an understanding that the power of scientific knowledge must be guided by a transcendent moral compass rooted in our sacred responsibility as stewards of creation. To embrace this integrated vision is an act of intellectual and spiritual liberation. It frees us from the sterile choice between a science that can explain everything but means nothing, and a faith that claims all meaning but fears all explanation. It allows us to be both rigorous in our thinking and expansive in our spirit. It invites us to weave together the threads of rational inquiry, empirical observation, spiritual intuition, and ethical reflection into a coherent and beautiful whole. The Quranic perspective ultimately calls us to a holistic humanism—one that celebrates our capacity to understand the intricate mechanics of a falling leaf while simultaneously standing in awe of the unseen hand that designed it, the ultimate purpose for which it falls, and our sacred duty to care for the tree from which it came. Bibliography Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. Translated by Justin O'Brien, New York: Vintage Books, 1991. Feynman, Richard. The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1965. Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Translated by Myra Bergman Ramos, 30th Anniversary ed., New York: Continuum, 2000. Heschel, Abraham Joshua. Man Is Not Alone: A Philosophy of Religion. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1976. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Otto, Rudolf. The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and its Relation to the Rational. Translated by John W. Harvey, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958. Saliba, George. Islamic Science and the Making of the European Renaissance. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2007. ----- V.A. Mohamad Ashrof is an independent Indian scholar specializing in Islamic humanism. With a deep commitment to advancing Quranic hermeneutics that prioritize human well-being, peace, and progress, his work aims to foster a just society, encourage critical thinking, and promote inclusive discourse and peaceful coexistence. He is dedicated to creating pathways for meaningful social change and intellectual growth through his scholarship. URL: https://www.newageislam.com/debating-islam/scientific-inquiry-revelatory-wisdom/d/136446 New Age Islam, Islam Online, Islamic Website, African Muslim News, Arab World News, South Asia News, Indian Muslim News, World Muslim News, Women in Islam, Islamic Feminism, Arab Women, Women In Arab, Islamophobia in America, Muslim Women in West, Islam Women and Feminism